Video Sources 0 Views

  • Watch traileryoutube.com
  • Source 1123movies
  • Source 2123movies
  • Source 3123movies
Conan the Barbarian 2011 123movies

Conan the Barbarian 2011 123movies

Enter an age undreamed ofAug. 17, 2011113 Min.
Your rating: 0
8 1 vote

Synopsis

Watch: Conan the Barbarian 2011 123movies, Full Movie Online – Many years ago, sorcerers crafted the Mask of Acheron and dark forces of Acheron conquered the world. However, the barbarians vanquished Acheron warriors and broke the Mask into pieces and divided among the tribes. The barbarian Cimmerian village of chief Corin is attacked by the evil warlord Khalar Zym that wants the last piece of bone of the Mask of Acheron to resurrect his wife. When his witch daughter Marique finds the hidden piece, he slaughters the villagers and the Corin’s son Conan is the only survivor. Conan swears revenge against Khalar Zym. Years later, the warrior Conan is a pirate and he decides to release slaves from a field. When he is celebrating in a tavern with his friends, he sees a thief being chased by a guard and Conan recognizes him as Lucius, the Khalar Zym’s soldier that he cut the nose out. Conan let the guards capture him and once in the prison, he forces Lucius to tell him where Khalar Zym is. Meanwhile Khalar Zym attacks a monastery where Marique believes that a pure-blood descent of Acheron lives. But the monk sent the descent Tamara back to her homeland. She is chased by Khalar Zym’s soldiers, but Conan saves her. Now Conan intends to use Tamara to reach the evil Khalar Zym. Will he succeed in his intent?.
Plot: A quest that begins as a personal vendetta for the fierce Cimmerian warrior soon turns into an epic battle against hulking rivals, horrific monsters, and impossible odds, as Conan realizes he is the only hope of saving the great nations of Hyboria from an encroaching reign of supernatural evil.
Smart Tags: #barbarian #ancient_world #conan_the_barbarian_character #slave #sex_scene #female_warrior #sword_and_sorcery #robert_e._howard #forging_a_sword #bare_chested_male #sword_and_fantasy #sword_and_sandal #loincloth #ship #b_movie #reboot #10000s_b.c. #resurrection_spell #magical_mask #daughter_flirting_with_father #twisted_father_daughter_relationship


Find Alternative – Conan the Barbarian 2011, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day


Ratings:

5.1/10 Votes: 99,728
25% | RottenTomatoes
36/100 | MetaCritic
N/A Votes: 1617 Popularity: 37.45 | TMDB

Reviews:


I quite liked this film, more than I liked Captain America: The First Avenger that we watched a couple of days ago. It has gotten some rather disappointing ratings. I obviously disagree.

I found the film to be pretty much what I hoped for. I read some reviews on IMDb stating that Conan only said about 40 words, that he wasn’t “barbaric” enough, that the fight scenes where chopped up and that you didn’t get to see much of the fighting.

In reality the first statement is a blatant lie and the others simply not true. The film is much bloodier than Schwarzenegger’s version and sometimes in a quite “barbaric” way. I do not know what people really expected from this film but for me it was pretty much what I hoped for. Although the Schwarzenegger films are somewhat out-dated I was still afraid that I would miss good old Schwarzy but I really didn’t (that much at least).

Special effects where quite okay and the 5.1 DTS Master Audio soundtrack was done well enough. It get’s a 7 out of 10 from me.

Review By: Per Gunnar Jonsson

_**Looks great, nice action, but needed more depth**_

Although the set-up of “Conan the Barbarian” (2011) is the same as the 1982 version (raiders destroy Conan’s village in Cimmeria and thus the barbarian seeks revenge) the story is otherwise completely different. The villains here are Khalar Zym and his witchy daughter, Marique, who seek to resurrect Zym’s sorcerous wife, but they need to acquire the pure blood necessary for their Acheron magic.

WHAT WORKS:

•Jason Momoa, as Conan, is excellent; far better than Arnie. It’s hard to conceive of a better Conan.

•The Bulgarian locations are outstanding.

•The Costuming is more convincing than the ’82 version. Conan’s apparel, for instance, is more faithful to REH than Arnie’s fur loincloth.

•Better acting than the ’82 version, excluding James Earl Jones, of course.

•Brutal, thrilling action throughout with convincing swordplay (unlike the contrived ’82 version).

•Corsairs, highlighted by Conan’s comrade Artus, effectively played by likable Nonso Anozie.

•Excellent sets/props; it definitely looks like the Hyborian Age.

•Good serious vibe, despite the cartoony, over-the-top last act.

•Rose McGowan as the witchy daughter is ee-vil and creepy.

•Ron Perlman as Conan’s father.

•The whole opening sequence.

•I liked how the film stressed the closeness and love of Conan and his father. There’s a correlation between true greatness and a close relationship with a strong father-figure and his example of excellence.

•You have to give credit to the filmmakers for effectively illustrating Conan’s youthful days and life in a Cimmerian village in general, something Conan’s creator never delved into in any detail.

WHAT DOESN’T WORK:

•The film deviates from Robert E. Howard, albeit not as much as the ’82 version. Regardless, it certainly adhered to REH’s overall pulp vibe. I’d prefer to see one of REH’s originals put to film, like “A Witch Shall Be Born” or “Beyond the Black River.”

•Stephan Lang as Zym makes a worthy enough villain for Conan, but he comes off too clichéd and cartoony, especially in the final act. James Earl Jones’ Thulsa Doom worked better, likely because he was so unique.

•Rachel Nichols’ Tamara is solid as the female protagonist, but she doesn’t hold a candle to Sandahl Bergman’s Valeria.

•The score is serviceable but pales in comparison with Basil Poledouris’ score from the ’82 version and “Conan The Destroyer” (1984). This score definitely won’t be celebrated 30 years later like Basil’s. Why didn’t they just update Polerdouris’ piece?

•There’s too much “Modern Blockbuster Syndrome” that appeals to those with ADHD.

•Especially the over-the-top final act, which is way too comic booky. It’s cartoony overkill, pure and simple. But, then again, it did bring to mind REH’s “Jewels of Gwahlur,” so maybe it’s not so far off the mark.

•The biggest flaw was that there wasn’t enough depth. The film needed more ‘downtime’ to contrast the wall-to-wall action, like campfire scenes (which would better indicate distances), more camaraderie on the ship, more development of Conan & Tamara’s relationship, etc. Although it had some of this, it wasn’t enough. Action sequences naturally hold more weight when the audience cares about the characters. As it is, it’s clear that the filmmakers wanted to make an action flick above all else and this weakens the film.

•Along with lack of depth was the lack of epic-ness or moving moments. The ’82 film deviated from REH but at least it made up for it with depth and a sense of epic-ness. For instance, when Conan & Subotai make their stand against the riders of doom or Conan’s moving victory salute, not to mention the potent love & death/funeral scenes, etc. This 2011 version had glimpses of this, like when Conan is birthed on the battlefield then raised to the sky and when Conan’s father expresses his love with his final act, but, again, it needed more.

CONCLUSION: The filmmakers got a lot of things right, like Momoa as Conan and the authentic look/feel of the Hyborian Age. The film’s not bad at all and pulsates with energy, but it needed more depth, epic-ness and uniqueness to pull it out of its “blockbuster” mediocrity. It’s a case of violence for the sake of violence, which gets dull by the 90-minute mark, plus the last act is just comic booky overload. The focus on wall-to-wall action limits the film’s effectiveness. It lacks the confidence to chill and allow the characters to breathe.

Still, it’s a somewhat worthy Conan movie. It’s serious and brutal; and, thankfully, lacks “cute” characters. It’s arguably on par with “Conan the Destroyer” and superior in ways, not to mention leagues better than “Red Sonja” (1985).

The film runs 1 hour, 53 minutes.

GRADE: B-/C+

Review By: Wuchak
Not one redeeming value…a failure
I’ve always been a fan not only of Robert E. Howard’s fantasy stories but also of the Marvel Comics or the 1982 film “Conan the Barbarian” with Arnold Schwarzenegger. So when I heard of a new Conan I was most interested. With today’s budget and cgi they really could pull it off. Oh Man I was wrong.

Where do I start as everything is wrong in this movie …Words cannot adequately describe how terrible this movie is. It’s that bad. However I have come to my senses to provide you with seven reasons why this film is bad.

Number 1 the plot is “shaky”. Here is the plot summary in one sentence: Conan witness the destruction of his Tribe and the Death of his Father by an evil Warlord who search the pieces of an ancient mask that is supposed to resurrect his wife, an evil sorceress that could grant him the powers of a God… OK??? Obviously a Conan film isn’t built on a Tarkovskian scenario but with this Conan we reach an apogee in terms of bad writing. Writers Thomas Dean Donnelly and Joshua Oppenheimer aren’t fit for writing. The least they could have done was to read Robert E. Howard’s literature and if as I suspect they aren’t capable of reading more than 10 pages, I suggest looking at Marvel Comics who introduced a relatively lore-faithful version of Conan the Barbarian in 1970 written by Roy Thomas and illustrated by Barry Windsor-Smith. In fact the total lack of understanding the character of Conan not only from the writers but also from Director Marcus Nispel and actor Jason Momoa is the main problem. I am not a Conan fanatic but if you put the word Conan somewhere in a movie title I guess as a Director you need to understand what is the essence of a Conan movie… You owe it to your audience; you owe it to yourself…

Number 2, the script is bad and as soon as Conan’s Mother opens her mouth to name his son before she dies we know we are in for a treat of bad dialogs and overall silly script. What follows is ridicule one liners deliver with zero conviction from every protagonist.

Number 3, where are the sidekicks? In a Conan film good sidekicks are mandatory. I remember Subotai (Jerry Lopez) in the 1982 Conan. He was a cool, loyal, and courageous dude. Every fan of this film remembers the crucifixion scene when suddenly Subotai appears in the horizon to save the day. Valeria was also a very likable and an equally strong character, some sort of Valkyrie that impacted Conan’s emotions. In this 2011 version female characters are filler. The dialog of the main female character consists in screaming “Conan” every time she is in danger. Moreover there are no charismatic sidekicks or even interesting other characters. The black pirate serves as a pretext for a black character but has the personality of a “playmobil”; the “Arabic” Thief is so common I don’t even remember his name or face.

Number 4, a good villain should have depth… Stephen Lang as Khalar Zym does not do the job. Sure there wasn’t much to do with the poor script he had in hands and screaming “barbarian!!!” every 2 seconds of his screen time doesn’t help. Plus Rose McGowan transformed by either plastic-surgery or bad cgi (couldn’t really tell) as his witchy daughter Marique is so outrageously goth that you constantly wonder if you are in a Conan film or in a remake of the Crow. Net net all protagonists are badly written and played even Ron Perlman, as Conan’s father, is wasted.

Number 5, there isn’t any consistency between the scenes…We watch Conan’s Ship being attacked during the night, but the next scene of the battle for the Ship happens during the day… We see the girl go mating with Conan in a rocky cave of what seems to be a cliff environment. In the next morning when she attempts to go back to the Ship she gets kidnapped in what appears to be a Forest. At this stage I kept wondering if the Director was a little bit “special” or if the film editor endured a lobotomy half way during the editing session. Now that I think about it it’s probably both.

Number 6, they didn’t hire a lead designer and that shows…they should have. Costumes, armors, or even Architecture (by the way you can clearly see the use of models) don’t fit the Conan universe and there isn’t any vision or unity regarding the design of the film. As a result you don’t have a feel that the story takes place in a possible ancient time with tangible ancient civilizations. So basically the production recycled costumes from the last 10 sand & sandals films and the result is catastrophic.

Number 7, they didn’t hire a composer and that shows too. I understand that not everyone can be Basil Poledouris the composer of the haunting score from the 1982 Conan but in this 2011 Conan I was forgetting the music as I was watching the film…this is a premiere to me.

As a conclusion there is close to nothing that is enjoyable in this film. There is no sense of adventure that makes a heroic fantasy film worth it. There is no sense of progression that makes a revenge plot efficacious. There is no sense of danger that makes an action film breathtaking. There is no sense of feasibility that makes a film epic. There is no adequate script that makes characters believable and there is no musical soundtrack that draws you into the Journey. Give me 45millions dollars (half of the amount spent on this mockery) and some of the Conan fans from IMDb and we will probably do a better film

Review By: auberus
Popcorn popping, blood pumping, rocking good time!!
In all my 1100 IMDb reviews I am beginning to understand the difference between critics and movie lovers. I am not a critic apparently. I can go into a film with an open mind and varying expectations and I can enjoy a flick for exactly what it is. Is Conan a feat of cinematical brilliance? Obviously not. Is the acting award worthy? No. And if you went expecting either one then you’re brain dead. Even if you went into expecting the campy cult feel of the original then you’re not thinking clearly. I went in not knowing what to expect and what I was met with was a rip roaring, blood soaked, brilliant action flick. It isn’t campy at all and I think the acting, especially from the lead cast, was significantly better than the original but there should be no comparisons anyways.

Jason Momoa tears onto the screen and ass kicking, sword wielding barbarian Conan and I think this should literally launch his career because he does a great job. Cult favorite character actor Ron Perlman also does a great job as Conan’s father who trains him and raises him as a warrior. My only complaint is that Perlman wasn’t used even more in the film. Stephan Lang deserves kudos for his role as the evil and twisted Zym who has terrific chemistry against both Perlman and Momoa. The supporting cast all do a good job and the story carries well on the backs of the main cast.

Director Marcus Nispel comes from music videos which can be a red flag for action flicks because I find that directors whose experience is in music make action movies that can sometimes be choppy and incoherent but that is the complete opposite of Conan that is beautifully shot, brilliant paced, gory, dark, gritty, just a wicked action movie. So the moral of the story is ignore people that are looking at a movie like this searching for something they will never find. Go into this movie understanding what it is and you’ll find yourself terrifically entertained and rooting for some more action! 9/10

Review By: Robert_duder

Other Information:

Original Title Conan the Barbarian
Release Date 2011-08-17
Release Year 2011

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 53 min (113 min)
Budget 90000000
Revenue 63523283
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Action, Adventure, Fantasy
Director Marcus Nispel
Writer Thomas Dean Donnelly, Joshua Oppenheimer, Sean Hood
Actors Jason Momoa, Ron Perlman, Rose McGowan
Country United States, Bulgaria, Germany, India
Awards 2 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A


Technical Information:

Sound Mix Datasat, Dolby Digital
Aspect Ratio 2.35 : 1
Camera Arricam LT, Zeiss Ultra Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses, Arriflex 435 Xtreme, Zeiss Ultra Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses
Laboratory Company 3, Los Angeles (CA), USA (digital intermediate), Kodak Cinelabs, Sofia, Bulgaria (processing)
Film Length 3,072 m (Portugal, 35 mm), 3,191 m (Spain)
Negative Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision2 100T 5212, Vision3 500T 5219)
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format), Super 35 (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (anamorphic) (Fuji Eterna-CP 3514DI), D-Cinema (also 3-D version)

Conan the Barbarian 2011 123movies
Conan the Barbarian 2011 123movies
Conan the Barbarian 2011 123movies
Conan the Barbarian 2011 123movies
Conan the Barbarian 2011 123movies
Conan the Barbarian 2011 123movies
Original title Conan the Barbarian
TMDb Rating 5.297 1,617 votes

Similar titles

The Porter: The Untold Story at Everest 2020 123movies
Camelot 1967 123movies
The Baader Meinhof Complex 2008 123movies
Throwback 2013 123movies
Lake Placid: Legacy 2018 123movies
Non Non Biyori: Vacation 2018 123movies
Deadline 1987 123movies
Cyberzone 1995 123movies
Batman: Under the Red Hood 2010 123movies
The Mitchells vs. the Machines 2021 123movies
King of Beggars 1992 123movies
Blackout 2022 123movies
Openloading.com: 123movies