Video Sources 0 Views

  • Watch traileryoutube.com
  • Source 1123movies
  • Source 2123movies
  • Source 3123movies
John Carter 2012 123movies

John Carter 2012 123movies

Lost in our world, found in another.Mar. 07, 2012132 Min.
Your rating: 0
6 1 vote

Synopsis

Watch: John Carter 2012 123movies, Full Movie Online – John Carter, a Civil War veteran, who in 1868 was trying to live a normal life, is “asked” by the Army to join, but he refuses so he is locked up. He escapes, and is pursued. Eventually they run into some Indians, and there’s a gunfight. Carter seeks refuge in a cave. While there, he encounters someone who is holding some kind of medallion. When Carter touches it, he finds himself in a place where he can leap incredible heights, among other things. He later encounters beings he has never seen before. He meets a woman who helps him to discover that he is on Mars, and he learns there’s some kind of unrest going on..
Plot: John Carter is a war-weary, former military captain who’s inexplicably transported to the mysterious and exotic planet of Barsoom (Mars) and reluctantly becomes embroiled in an epic conflict. It’s a world on the brink of collapse, and Carter rediscovers his humanity when he realizes the survival of Barsoom and its people rests in his hands.
Smart Tags: #arizona_desert #princess #alien #arizona_territory #american_civil_war #gladiator #virginia #male_nipple #planetary_romance #branded #profanity #apache_territory #apache_indian #weapons_fire #male_captain #airship #bare_chested_man #mars_the_planet #human_on_mars #terran #temple


Find Alternative – John Carter 2012, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day


Ratings:

6.6/10 Votes: 274,156
52% | RottenTomatoes
51/100 | MetaCritic
N/A Votes: 4933 Popularity: 50.377 | TMDB

Reviews:


Edgar Rice Burroughs wrote his series of John Carter novels before space flight was more than a fancy. This movie is more adventure and romance and very little (if any) actual science.

This movie is the best production of A Princess of Mars, the first story in the series, that I’ve seen.

If you’re a fan of the John Carter novels then you will probably get some enjoyment from John Carter. While there are some differences you’ll meet some familiar characters and recognize quite a few relevant plot points.

Not a great film, but not a bad one, either.

Review By: YetAnotherMovieWatcher

We sat down and watched this movie on Blu-ray yesterday evening to nicely end our little excursion day. This is a good film but it could have been (much) better.

The film itself and its special effects are quite good. I would say that the special effects are very good. The airships are very cool looking. The design nicely captures the retro atmosphere of the book without looking silly. I think they made the green men too slim though. I have always pictured them as way more bulky and monstrous. I like Woola’s appearance although him moving around at “supersonic” speeds is a bit over the top.

However, why is it that every film-company/producer/director/whatever now thinks that he can take an old classic, slam on the name in the title, and then do what the hell he likes with the material? This film has borrowed the basic idea and the names from Edgar Rice Burroughs John Carter book but almost nothing else. At most 10% of the story of the books is in the movie. The rest is pure invention and it does not improve the story. As a matter of fact it turns what was a good story into a standard unintelligent Hollywood faire. Been there, seen that, done that.

The examples are plentiful, the white apes the size of dinosaurs, the city of Zodanga moves around (what the f…), most of the plot as I said before is invented, the Therns have a completely different role etc. etc.

I especially dislike how they have made John Carter, the honorable gentleman from Virginia, into a fairly plain American guy who at first refuses to do the “right” thing. And what about these bloody wife and child flashbacks? That’s just disturbing.

None of this improves the movie. It got 6 stars, it could have gotten 9 or 10 if it had followed the books properly. It is Disney’s own fault that this movie was a disappointment at the box office, they screwed with classical material…again.

Review By: Per Gunnar Jonsson
Nowhere near the disaster that it has been reputed to be
Of course John Carter is a long way from flawless, but it is also not that bad but you wouldn’t think so looking at its box office failure, its reputation and also how terribly marketed it was. Sure the plot is thin as ice in places with scenes that go on for far longer than they needed to, and it is also predictable and with the odd convoluted part, with the many logical lapses not helping in its favour. Particularly at the end, which gave off a sense that the film didn’t know how to end itself. The script is uneven too, a fair bit of it is actually quite intelligently handled with some entertainment and suspense but there are other points where the dialogue does make one cringe and you do wish you learnt more about the characters and that the romance wasn’t so disjointed and forced. John Carter however does look incredible, the backdrops and scenery are bursting with colour and detail and don’t look fake at all and the special effects are equally impressive and not cartoony at all, they are at least well modelled and move easily. Michael Giaccino’s music score is outstanding being full of bombastic energy and sweeping intensity, doing all that while fitting with the action and not swamping it. There is plenty of action and it is action that is a feast for the eyes and choreographically is very well-executed, the best of them dazzlingly so. Of the characters, the most enjoyable one was Woola, a very cute and very funny dog creature- the CGI for the character is very well done and some of the best of the film actually- that children and adults alike will take a shine to. Andrew Stanton, considering that his field is more in animation and that the crew for John Carter is so huge, had a very daunting task and does so bravely, though with the odd understandable occasion where he seemed out of sorts with the live actors. While the story may not be the greatest, John Carter shouldn’t be taken too seriously, it was intended to be harmless family fun and is so and it has an earnest, old-fashioned approach that works and in keeping with the source material. The performances are not bad at all, Taylor Kitsch does start off for a while ill at ease and over-serious but once he relaxes he does make for a likable hero. Lynn Collins is both feisty and human, and the supporting cast all make an effort to make much of little with Willem Dafoe, Mark Strong(in a role that suits him to a tee) and Ciaron Hinds being the most successful. In conclusion, not flawless by any stretch of the imagination but far from a disaster either. 7/10 Bethany Cox
Review By: TheLittleSongbird
Not bad at all
John Carter (2012)

A writer reads a friends journal, learning of his fantastic journey to planet of Mars, the warring factions therein and the beautiful princess he loved….hilarity ensues.

Low expectations are an underrated commodity. Given the extremely poor nature of the trailers and the bad press it received, my expectations couldn’t have been lower for a flick I still kind of wanted to see.

Though thinking about it, most of the bad press was about the box office rather than the quality of the film, although some of the critic’s reviews were very snippy. Seemed like some folks just had it in for Andrew Stanton, although quite why is puzzling. Previous credits being mainly Pixar based, screenplay/story credits on the Toy Story films and director of Finding Nemo and Wall-E. An odd hate figure, to say the least. Maybe he’s a horrible person or maybe people just wanted a Pixar alum to fail.

Because, contrary to everything, I found John Carter to be thoroughly entertaining.

I’m not familiar with the Burroughs stories (do have recollections of the 70’s Marvel Comics adaptation) so I can’t really on its faithfulness to them but the tale is told quite cleverly with some verve.

Probably the biggest thing working against it is that most of Burroughs’ best ideas have been filched by other storytellers. A beautiful princess needing to be rescued by a chosen one from a force trying to build an empire, assisted by the machinations of a shadowy figure. A battle on floating airships over a desert. Chained hero fighting large beasties in a rock arena. Any of this ring any bells?

Cripes. Even the energy weapon given to the main villain seems similar to the weapons fashioned from the Tesseract in Captain America and Loki’s staff in The Avengers.

So, there’s that. Burroughs’ ideas have been “homaged” left, right and centre in the 100 years since the first story was written. Unfortunately and probably due to a desire to be faithful to the stories as written, it leaves some of its ideas feeling somewhat second hand.

There are a couple of longueurs where the film could have been tightened up and there are a number of moments where the green screen joins can be seen in the effects (potentially due to rushing to meet a release date) but these are quibbles.

Taylor Kitsch looks the part though a tad lacking in charisma but Lynn Collins gets lovelier the longer the film runs and there is strong support from Ciaran Hinds, Dominic West and the vocal talents of Willem Dafoe, Thomas Haden Church and Samantha Morton. Mark Strong seems to have the SF bald baddie axis tied up and one presumes casting directors come down to whoever’s available between him and Hugo Weaving nowadays.

I’d recommend at least one viewing of John Carter for lovers of SF and Fantasy, even for academic purposes when if, like me, you’re a Burroughs’ virgin. It could be an eye opener how much stuff old Edgar dreamt up.

Review By: gillman11

Other Information:

Original Title John Carter
Release Date 2012-03-07
Release Year 2012

Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 12 min (132 min)
Budget 250000000
Revenue 284139100
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
Director Andrew Stanton
Writer Andrew Stanton, Mark Andrews, Michael Chabon
Actors Taylor Kitsch, Lynn Collins, Willem Dafoe
Country United States
Awards 2 wins & 8 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A


Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby Digital, Datasat, SDDS, Dolby Surround 7.1, Sonics-DDP
Aspect Ratio 2.35 : 1
Camera 3ality Technica 3D Rig (back plates), Panavision Panaflex Millennium XL2, Panavision Primo, C-, E-Series, ATZ and AWZ2 Lenses
Laboratory DeLuxe, Hollywood (CA), USA, EFILM Digital Laboratories, Hollywood (CA), USA (digital intermediate), Technicolor, London, UK (dailies)
Film Length 3.74 m (Portugal, 35 mm), 3,628 m (Spain), 3,709.41 m (7 reels)
Negative Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision3 200T 5213, Vision3 500T 5219)
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format), Panavision (anamorphic) (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision 2383), 70 mm (horizontal) (IMAX DMR blow-up) (also dual-strip 3-D) (Kodak Vision 2383), D-Cinema (also 3-D version)

John Carter 2012 123movies
John Carter 2012 123movies
John Carter 2012 123movies
John Carter 2012 123movies
John Carter 2012 123movies
John Carter 2012 123movies
John Carter 2012 123movies
John Carter 2012 123movies
John Carter 2012 123movies
John Carter 2012 123movies
Original title John Carter
TMDb Rating 6.259 4,933 votes

Similar titles

Logan Lucky 2017 123movies
Spawn 1997 123movies
Blood Money 2012 123movies
The Order 2001 123movies
DC Showcase: Kamandi: The Last Boy on Earth! 2021 123movies
The Accidental Spy 2001 123movies
Contamination 1980 123movies
New World Order X 2013 123movies
Bride of Re-Animator 1990 123movies
Parallel Minds 2020 123movies
The 7 Adventures of Sinbad 2010 123movies
Land Ho! 2014 123movies
Openloading.com: 123movies