What's happening?

Video Sources 207 Views Report Error

  • Watch traileryoutube.com
  • Source 1123movies
  • Source 2123movies
  • Source 3123movies
  • Source 4123movies
  • Source 5123movies
  • Source 6123movies
The Current War 2019 123movies

The Current War 2019 123movies

Power changes everythingJul. 18, 2019105 Min.
Your rating: 0
6 1 vote


#123movies #fmovies #putlocker #gomovies #solarmovie #soap2day Watch Full Movie Online Free – The dramatic story of the cutthroat race between electricity titans Thomas A. Edison and George Westinghouse to determine whose electrical system would power the modern world.
Plot: Electricity titans Thomas Edison and George Westinghouse compete to create a sustainable system and market it to the American people.
Smart Tags: #world’s_fair #1893_columbian_exposition #based_on_true_story #lens_flare #chicago_illinois #thomas_edison_character #patent_application #menlo_park_new_jersey #j.p._morgan_character #morse_code #chester_a._arthur_character #pittsburgh_pennsylvania #reference_to_giuseppe_verdi #trick_question #train_trip #phonograph #george_westinghouse_character #nikola_tesla_character #westinghouse_corporation #great_barrington_massachusetts #execution

The Current War 2017 Streaming Links:


The Current War 2019 123movies 1 The Current War 2019 123movies 26.5/10 Votes: 21,036
The Current War 2019 123movies 3 The Current War 2019 123movies 231%
The Current War 2019 123movies 5 The Current War 2019 123movies 255/100
The Current War 2019 123movies 7 The Current War 2019 123movies 26.7 Votes: 680 Popularity: 15.407


_**Well acted and reasonably engaging, although there’s a significant disconnect between form and content**_

>_The electric-lighting company with which I am connected purchased some time ago the patents for a complete alternating system, and my protest against this action can be found upon its minute-book. Up to the present time I have succeeded in inducing them not to offer this system to the public, nor will they ever do so with my consent. My personal desire would be to prohibit entirely the use of alternating currents. They are as unnecessary as they are dangerous._

– Thomas Edison; “The Dangers of Electrical Lighting”; _North American Review_, 149:396 (November, 1889)

>_Any plan of distribution involving the meshing of the mains underneath the streets, with all house wires connected directly thereto, is regarded by the majority of competent electrical engineers as in many respects radically defective; so defective, in fact, that, unless the use of alternating currents can be prohibited, it seems destined to be wholly supplanted by the more scientific and in all respects (so far as concerns the users or occupants of buildings) far safer inductive system. Apparently sensible of this, Mr. Edison does not hesitate to say: “My personal desire would be to prohibit entirely the use of alternating currents.”_

– George Westinghouse; “A Reply to Mr. Edison”; _North American Review_, 149:397 (December, 1889)

>_If Edison had a needle to find in a haystack, he would proceed at once with the diligence of the bee to examine straw after straw until he found the object of his search. I was a sorry witness of such doings, knowing that a little theory and calculation would have saved him ninety per cent of his labour._

– Nikola Tesla; _The New York Times_ (October 19, 1931)

Filmed between December 2016 and March 2017, when _The Current War_ debuted in a near-completed form at TIFF in September 2017, it was considered a major contender for the 2018 Academy Awards. Scheduled for a prime awards-season release on December 22 (shortly thereafter changed to November 24), and with a number of heavyweight producers (Timur Bekmambetov, Basil Iwanyk, Harvey Weinstein) and executive producers (Martin Scorsese, Bob Weinstein, Steven Zaillian), the film was to be distributed by The Weinstein Company, with Harvey in particular known for his ruthlessly efficient Oscar campaigns. He was overseeing the assemblage of the final cut in October when he was accused of sexual assault and rape by numerous women, and when he abandoned the project, the November release was shelved. Little more was heard of the film until October 2018, when Lantern Entertainment (which had acquired The Weinstein Company’s assets) and 13 Films brokered a deal to co-distribute the film internationally in July 2019. Then, in April of this year, 101 Studios announced they would handle a limited release in North America in October, whilst director Alfonso Gomez-Rejon (_Me and Earl and the Dying Girl_) revealed he had re-edited the film, adding five additional scenes but trimming the overall run time by 10 minutes.

So is it worth the wait? Well, it’s competently acted, reasonably entertaining, and moderately informative, but…it definitely won’t be involved in the 2020 Oscars. It’s certainly not as bad as a lot of critics (most of them reviewing the TIFF cut) have made out, but there’s no denying that Gomez-Rejon over-directs the whole thing. If you listen to Paul Haggis’s commentary track on _Crash_ (2004), he tells a story about a scene which was filmed to begin with an elaborate camera move via a crane transitioning into a dolly shot. In the final film, however, all of that is gone, and Haggis explains that he realised during the edit that the camera moves were unjustified, doing little but drawing attention to themselves. A _lot_ of _The Current War_’s aesthetic draws attention to itself, primarily because Gomez-Rejon’s elaborate direction is so out of sync with Michael Mitnick’s by-the-numbers script – like a screenplay intended for Michael Bay ended up being directed by Michael Mann. Although make no mistake, Gomez-Rejon is no Mann.

Telling the story of the “war of the currents”, the film opens in New Jersey in 1880 as the pioneer of the long-lasting electric light bulb, Thomas Edison (Benedict Cumberbatch proving once and for all that he can’t do an American accent), stages a typically grandiose demonstration of the power of large-scale low-voltage direct current (DC). When Edison next illuminates five square blocks of Manhattan, George Westinghouse (an uncharacteristically non-psychotic Michael Shannon), best known as the inventor of the railway air brake, begins to consider that the way of the future is not in gas, as he previously believed, but in electricity. However, he sees flaws in DC, and so favours high-voltage alternating current (AC), using transformers to step down the voltage. Edison’s is the safer of the two systems, but so too is it more expensive, with a limited range compared to AC. To highlight this very point, Westinghouse illuminates Great Barrington, Massachusetts from over a mile away. He invites Edison to discuss a partnership, but Edison, who believes Westinghouse has stolen his ideas, snubs him, and the rest of the film takes place over the next 13 years as the two men come into direct conflict with one another in the “race to light America”. As Edison begins to lose ground to Westinghouse, he takes the decision to grossly overstate the danger of AC, whilst also surreptitiously attempting to convince the city of New York to use AC in its proposed first “electric chair” execution, thus tainting Westinghouse’s brand. The rivalry culminates in 1893 as each attempt to secure the contract for the World’s Columbian Exposition (aka the Chicago World’s Fair). Along the way we meet such people as Serbian-American inventor Nikola Tesla (an underused Nicholas Hoult); Edison’s loyal to a fault assistant Samuel Insull (Tom Holland); Westinghouse’s chief electrical engineer Franklin Pope (Stanley Townsend); Edison’s wife Mary (Tuppence Middleton); Westinghouse’s wife Marguerite (Katherine Waterston); Edison’s main financial backer J.P Morgan (Matthew Macfadyen); and the first man to be executed via electrocution, William Kemmler (Conor MacNeill).

Originally conceived as a stage musical by Mitnick, thematically, a great deal of _The Current War_’s concerns remain unstated; yes, it’s obviously about the war of the currents, but there’s more to it than that. Edison and Westinghouse are presented as opposite examples of the nature of success in an American free-market prospering during a period of immense technological innovation. Whilst Edison is driven by legacy and fame, Westinghouse simply wishes to improve people’s lives and is unconcerned with celebrity. Important here is Tesla, who is essentially a foil for the two leads, as the film details his inability to remain under Edison’s employment, stating his desire to “detach power from profit”, a concept utterly alien to Edison, for whom power _is_ profit.

Edison is depicted as aware of and addicted to his celebrity, a visionary enamoured of his own genius, convinced that he and he alone has the mental capacity to achieve success. He’s also portrayed as a poor husband and father, and a lousy boss, who demands that his employees’ dedication match his own. On the other hand, the more stable, less flamboyant Westinghouse is devoted to his wife, values his collaborators, has no interest in fame, and doesn’t even see Edison as competition, believing that they should be working together. Indeed, the film goes so far as to suggest that Edison knew Westinghouse’s system was the superior of the two but stubbornly refused to yield, ultimately employing baseless fear as a weapon.

The most immediately notable aspect of _The Current War_, however, is its aesthetic, specifically Gomez-Rejon’s direction and the photography by Chung Chung-hoon (_Oldeuboi_; _Ahgassi_; _It: Chapter One_). Watching the film, I was reminded somewhat of Adrian Martin’s 1992 article, “_Mise-en-scène_ is dead, or the expressive, the excessive, the technical and the stylish”, in which he divides _mise-en-scène_ into three broad categories: classical (“_in which there is a definite stylistic restraint at work_”), expressive (“_general strategies of colour coding, camera viewpoint, sound design and so on enhance or reinforce the general “feel” or meaning of the subject matter_”), and mannerist (“_performs out of its own trajectories, no longer working unobtrusively at the behest of the fiction_”). Whilst I would posit that _The Current War_ lands somewhere between the expressive and mannerist styles, it definitely lies closer to the “all style, no substance” paradigm of mannerist _mise-en-scène_, rather than the synergy between form and content found in the work of most expressive filmmakers (one of Martin’s examples of which is the aforementioned Michael Mann).

Some of Gomez-Rejon’s aesthetic choices are definitely justified, arising directly from the content and serving a clear thematic purpose, but a lot of the aesthetic design is in service of nothing but itself. An early example of a justified decision is when the camera pans up from Edison’s New Jersey demonstration and quickly travels to Westinghouse’s Pittsburgh home in what is made to appear a single shot (the unconvincing CGI is beside the point). The effect is to connect the two men, not just in terms of geography, but, more importantly, ideology. Another shot in this scene, shooting directly down on Edison’s elaborate circular light demonstration, also works well, serving to instantly show us his ambition and theatricality, plus the effectiveness of the demonstration itself. Once we reach Pittsburgh, a lengthy single-take shot introduces us to Westinghouse as he weaves his way through a throng of guests at a ball, with virtually everyone trying to catch his attention. This immediately establishes him as a man of influence and considerable reach, but one who abhors the spotlight. In a later scene, Gomez-Rejon shoots Edison and his family in a train carriage, but using a very wide fisheye lens. With Edison on one seat and his wife and two children facing him, the wide lens distorts the space between them unnaturally, mirroring the important theme of Edison neglecting and moving away from his family in pursuit of his goals.

On the other hand, some of the choices are extremely hard to rationalise. That this should be important is attested by Thomas Elsaesser and Warren Buckland in their 2002 book, _Studying Contemporary American Film: A Guide to Movie Analysis_. During their analysis of Martin’s tryptic division, they say of the mannerist style, “_style is autonomous, for it is not linked to function, but draws attention to itself. In other words, style is not motivated or justified by the subject matter, but is its own justification_”. This is an apt a description of large portions of _The Current War_ as you’re going to find. For example, there are more Dutch angles than I’ve seen in a film since Oliver Stone’s _Natural Born Killers_ (1994), but unlike Stone’s usage, when and how Gomez-Rejon deploys them is more often than not arbitrary. He also uses split-screen on occasion, and at one point, he even splits the screen into three. Again though, the reason why he employs such a technique is unclear (compare it with something like Darren Aronofsky’s _Requiem for a Dream_ (2000), where every use of split-screen is wholly justified by the narrative). This ripped me out of the film, as I constantly found myself asking, “_I wonder why he did that_”, rather than paying attention to the content. Ironically enough, whilst the idea was obviously to cover up for the script’s inadequacies via aggressive aesthetic energy, the fact that so few of Gomez-Rejon’s techniques are justified actually draws our attention to that script, as no amount of directorial gymnastics can cover the structural and pacing problems.

The handling of the characters is also problematic. Cumberbatch, for example, plays Edison as virtually identical to his portrait of Alan Turing in Morten Tyldum’s _The Imitation Game_ (2014); a brilliant, driven, uncompromising innovator who’s as difficult to relate to in terms of humanity as he is easy to admire for mental acumen. Elsewhere, the film has a habit of downplaying the supporting characters. For example, neither Mary Edison nor Marguerite Westinghouse are developed beyond “supportive wife”, whilst Insull gets just one decent scene, which comes so late as to be fairly meaningless. The worst example of this is, however, is the depiction of Tesla, who is very much an afterthought, so under-developed that one wonders if it would have been better to leave him out altogether. This tendency is also found in a postscript which credits Edison, and Edison alone, with the development of the Kinetoscope (one of the first motion picture cameras), without so much as a mention of Louis Le Prince or William Kennedy Dickson.

Nevertheless, as serious as these problems are, I rather enjoyed _The Current War_. Granted, that may be because I’ve always been drawn more to expressive _mise-en-scène_, preferring _auteur_s who aren’t afraid to employ an aesthetic signature, as opposed to those who are happy to disappear behind the work, _á la_ someone like Steven Spielberg, Ridley Scott, or Ron Howard. It was never going to be the kind of Oscar contender that was obviously intended, but the behind-the-scenes turmoil and the critical mauling are not necessarily indicative of an inherently bad film. Sure, the script is very weak in places, and Gomez-Rejon employs every camera trick known to man, more often than not without knowing why. But for all that, it kept me interested, and although I’d never argue it’s an especially well-realised historical drama, I did, for the most part, enjoy it.

Review By: Stephen Campbell Rating: 7 Date: 2019-09-27
In another case of “when bad movies happen to great actors“, ‘The Current War’ has all the elements for a great picture including its exceptional cast, but lacks the base appeal for the people who have to buy a ticket. Sadly, this is a rare and unfortunate case of the sum of the film’s parts being greater than the whole.
– Jess Fenton

Read Jess’ full article…

Review By: SWITCH. Rating: 4 Date: 2020-03-14
Tesla, Westinghouse & Edison… the Real story?
Thought the casting on Cumberbatch’s behalf was odd as he doesn’t resemble nor act as you would suspect Edison to act (on the uncharacteristic side). Others in the cast seemed right. I’ve read where people argued the story-line of the movie vs. actual, and I’ve done a lot of reading on Edison and Tesla and actually found it very close.. plus the AC vs. DC rivalry with Westinghouse (including electrocution) to be VERY accurate. The story doesn’t have a lot of “wow” to it (like a fictitious story would), but considering it based on real-life, it felt right. Oddly, the focus seemed to be heavy on Edison, yet the aspect of the story with Edison/Westinghouse truly MAKING AC work (and the person truly on the “shaft end of the stick”) was Tesla!! The characterization of Tesla really left a massive untold story of pure genius receiving the most unfair treatment (though touched upon). YES.. Edison DID tell him he’d pay him a huge amount if he could figure out the problem.. and YES.. Edison did say “he was joking” (as in real life). It mentions Edison’s venture into film, but if the film makers wanted to tell a more interesting story about Edison, it might be about his film work and competition with the Lumière brothers (the two brothers who actually were the real leaders of motion pictures. There are horror stories of Edison hiring hit men to show up where people were filming with Lumière film equipment to beat them up and destroy the equipment. Edison is portrayed a bit of a victim in this movie, but it seems that he really was anything BUT that. It seems that whoever wrote the screen play or story didn’t know enough about Tesla to really portray him as the real victim he was, nor recognize Edison’s very underhanded way of sometimes doing things. The film points out (justifiably) that often people credited with inventions are really just the person getting the last development in (not truly the original inventor). I’d LOVE to see Scorsese do a complete story focused on Tesla. THAT’S the REAL story here!
Review By: dan_slentz Rating: 6 Date: 2019-09-15
Um… what was that?
1. Don’t bother if you don’t have a good background understanding of the real life events and characters- the film offers you no introductions. 2. There are no scenes per se, just a montage of clips. You bounce from one clip to another, all smushed together without a coherent narrative or timeline. 3. Cumberbatch is yet again stereotyped as the brilliant and bizarre genuis hero of the film. With a bad American accent. 4. The directing and editing is just BIZARRE. Strange use of odd camera angles throughout the whole film, for no reason. 5. Fosters no emotional connection to any of the characters. No reason for the viewer to be invested in anyone.
Review By: lydiaponting Rating: 3 Date: 2019-07-26

Other Information:

Original Title The Current War
Release Date 2019-07-18
Release Year 2017

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 48 min (108 min), 1 hr 42 min (102 min) (USA)
Budget 0
Revenue 0
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Biography, Drama, History
Director Alfonso Gomez-Rejon
Writer Michael Mitnick
Actors Benedict Cumberbatch, Oliver Powell, Sophia Ally, Tuppence Middleton
Country USA, Russia, UK
Awards N/A
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix N/A
Aspect Ratio 2.39 : 1
Camera Arri Alexa XT Plus, Panavision Primo and G-Series Lenses
Laboratory Company 3, Los Angeles (CA), USA (digital intermediate)
Film Length N/A
Negative Format Codex
Cinematographic Process ARRIRAW (2.8K) (source format), Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format), Panavision (anamorphic) (source format)
Printed Film Format D-Cinema

The Current War 2019 123movies
The Current War 2019 123movies
The Current War 2019 123movies
The Current War 2019 123movies
The Current War 2019 123movies
The Current War 2019 123movies
The Current War 2019 123movies
The Current War 2019 123movies
Original title The Current War
TMDb Rating 6.7 680 votes

Similar titles

Mystic Pizza 1988 123movies
Out of Liberty 2019 123movies
Inferno 1999 123movies
Imperium 2016 123movies
Stories USA 2007 123movies
The Littlest Outlaw 1955 123movies
Five Minutes of Heaven 2009 123movies
Manikarnika: The Queen of Jhansi 2019 123movies
My Skinny Sister 2015 123movies
Hotel Chevalier 2007 123movies
Kalashnikov AK 47 2020 123movies
Giovanni’s Island 2014 123movies
Openloading.com: 123Movies