#123movies #fmovies #putlocker #gomovies #solarmovie #soap2day Watch Full Movie Online Free – Mr. Neville, a cocksure young artist, is contracted by Mrs. Herbert, the wife of a wealthy landowner, to produce a set of twelve drawings of her husband’s estate, a contract which extends much further than either the purse or the sketchpad. The sketches themselves prove of an even greater significance than supposed upon the discovery of the body of Mr. Herbert.
Plot: A young artist is commissioned by the wife of a wealthy landowner to make a series of drawings of the estate while her husband is away.
Smart Tags: #sex_scene #deception #england #artistic_creation #period_drama #male_nudity #male_full_frontal_nudity #pubic_hair #male_pubic_hair #cuckolded_husband #dysfunctional_marriage #clubbed_to_death #lynching #lynched #revenge #hit_on_the_head #eyes_gouged #lynch_mob #murdered_husband #forced_sex #forced_prostitution
|7.3/10 Votes: 9,265|
|7.2 Votes: 124 Popularity: 8.734|
Self Referential Allegorical Mystery
Is Greenaway our most intelligent filmmaker? One of them at least. He is master of lush self-referential allegory. Here this is hung on a mystery masquerading as restoration comedy. Just maintaining the period and manner is quite a feat.
Self-reference. The film is about an artist who creates rich images that include incongruous elements. The arrogance of the artist is balanced by his blindness as to the meaning, the context of what the images reveal. Both the artist and the viewers are confused by the meaning and flummoxed by the events that the meaning triggers. Greenaway clearly means this to extend to himself, his film and the incompleteness of what we the viewers see. The drawings and the drawer’s hands are in fact his.
Fantasy-allegory. This is a film richer in symbology than Drowning and Cook, but probably less so than the later `book’ movies. Great attention has been spent on recondite supplementary images, including a central painting in the house being itself painted by the draftsman and filmmaker. I viewed it (the whole film) once just for details. The living statue is only the most obvious illogical element, and in fact draws attention away from other smaller visual diversions.
Mystery artifice. The whole environment is one of genteel artifice, hiding cruel mechanics of conspiracy. The cleverness of the construction is that Greenaway and us are full conspirators. No one, not us, him or the characters shown fully understand what is going on. The mystery form has always been a dialog between artist and consumer, a contest to see who can outwit whom. Very clever use of the mystery form here to include us in the artifice by not ever `playing fair.’
Restoration comedy. Past the visual allegory and the fantasy mystery and the self-reference is a restoration comedy which taken straight is hilarious. The statue is from this form.
My only criticisms are minor. This film contains a restrained story, and incidentally all sex takes place offscreen. Why be so conservative in these areas? Also, Lady Herbert required a more powerful actress I think.
A convoluted enigma of a picture, but a must see one.
This is a most intricately structured enigma of a film, one that seems on the surface to be ordinary, but underneath has many layers that need examining in detail from several viewings. The story is set in the English countryside in 1694. The prominent character is a draughtsman named Mr. Neville, who is asked by a lady named Mrs. Herbert to make twelve drawings of her house from different angles. He agrees, as long as he can have the lady for his intimate pleasure.
Mr. Neville is a perfectionist, and very meticulous in his drawings. He states to everyone at the house all his rules about everything that has to remain in the same place while he draws. The film moves along nicely, everything seems usual, then events start to become strange. Stone statues start to move around, and take up different locations to contort into another static pose. Objects start to change location to confuse Mr. Neville in his drawings. Then Mrs. Herbert’s daughter approaches Mr. Neville and tells him her father may have been murdered. She says she has evidence to indict Mr. Neville of his murder, and blackmails him, requesting his service for her sexual needs. Then Mr. Herbert’s body is found in a ditch and things get even more complex.
This film is one of those that you need to watch and try and unravel yourself. To try to do that here in this review is almost impossible. I recommend it. It is exquisitely performed and filmed. The costumes are good. The speeches by the cast are delivered in a grandiose and statement-like manner. The music is appropriate. A classic piece of puzzling cinema that will have you watching it many times.
Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 48 min (108 min)
Genre Comedy, Drama, History, Mystery
Director Peter Greenaway
Writer Peter Greenaway
Actors Anthony Higgins, Janet Suzman, Anne-Louise Lambert, Hugh Fraser
Awards 1 win & 3 nominations.
Production Company British Film Institute, Channel Four Films
Sound Mix Mono
Aspect Ratio 1.66 : 1
Camera Aaton LTR, Zeiss Super Speed and Cooke Varokinetal Lenses
Laboratory Kay Laboratories Ltd., London, UK
Film Length 2,950 m, 2,970 m (Finland)
Negative Format 16 mm (Eastman 100T 7247)
Cinematographic Process Super 16
Printed Film Format 35 mm (blow-up)