Video Sources 0 Views

  • Watch traileryoutube.com
  • Source 1123movies
  • Source 2123movies
  • Source 3123movies
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 2003 123movies

The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 2003 123movies

The eye of the enemy is moving.Dec. 01, 2003201 Min.
Your rating: 0
8 1 vote

Synopsis

Watch: The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 2003 123movies, Full Movie Online – The final confrontation between the forces of good and evil fighting for control of the future of Middle-earth. Frodo and Sam reach Mordor in their quest to destroy the One Ring, while Aragorn leads the forces of good against Sauron’s evil army at the stone city of Minas Tirith..
Plot: Aragorn is revealed as the heir to the ancient kings as he, Gandalf and the other members of the broken fellowship struggle to save Gondor from Sauron’s forces. Meanwhile, Frodo and Sam take the ring closer to the heart of Mordor, the dark lord’s realm.
Smart Tags: #epic #orc #middle_earth #journey #hobbit #ring #battle #quest #good_versus_evil #king #wizard #fate #falling_into_lava #race_against_time #lava #volcano #volcanic_eruption #curse #courage #elrond_character #galadriel_character


Find Alternative – The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 2003, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day


Ratings:

9.0/10 Votes: 1,837,587
93% | RottenTomatoes
94/100 | MetaCritic
N/A Votes: 20605 Popularity: 65.369 | TMDB

Reviews:


An outstanding end to the trilogy.

I expected a lot from ‘The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King’ so I am delighted to see it produce on so many levels. I, funnily enough, wouldn’t actually say it’s necessarily the most perfect execution – what with the plot coincidences and extreme character armour. But that doesn’t matter one jot whatsoever, as the story wraps up in arguably the best way – at least to watch – possible. It has so much heart and feeling to it.

The story involving the characters of Elijah Wood, Sean Astin and Andy Serkis remained the most interesting to me, I was very satisfied with how it concluded in regards to them. I also enjoyed the bits we got of Viggo Mortensen, Ian McKellen & Co. All that added to the beautiful look and creation of the film, with the world coming alive splendidly.

If I were to nit-pick further, I would say the run time is slightly too long. The pacing is absolutely fine, very good in fact, but I coulda done without a few of the many end scenes – a lot of which are necessary and welcome, but a couple could’ve been left out to allow the viewer to imagine how the world continued. That’s just how I feel mind, I’m sure I’m one of only a few that think that way.

Back onto the positives: how about those battle sequences? Astonishingly good. A sensational trilogy, no question about it. I look forward to seeing ‘The Hobbit’ films.

Review By: r96sk

Too much CGI, redundancy, clichés and drawn out “looks of love” for my tastes.

RELEASED 2003 and directed by Peter Jackson, “The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King” adapts the third part of JRR Tolkien’s popular fantasy trilogy about adventures on Middle-Earth: Frodo (Elijah Wood), Sam (Sean Astin) and Gollum (Andy Serkis) continue to try to make their way to Mount Doom to destroy the One Ring. Meanwhile Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen), Legolas the Elf (Orlando Bloom), Gimli the Dwarf (John Rhys-Davies), Gandalf the wizard (Ian McKellen), King Theoden (Bernard Hill) and Faramir (David Wenham) join forces to fight Sauron’s army at the stone city of Minas Tirith and, later, draw the forces of Modor out as a distraction for Frodo to accomplish his goal. Billy Boyd and Dominic Monaghan are on hand as Hobbits Pippin and Merry.

While I’m a casual fantasy/adventure fan and have read numerous books of the genre (e.g. Conan, Tarzan, Gor, etc.), I’ve never read Tokien, likely because I’m not into Hobbits, Elves and Dwarfs. After viewing the three movies, The Lord of the Rings strikes me as a mixture of Robin Hood, Conan and The Wizard of Oz, which all possibly influenced Tolkien’s writing of the Rings trilogy in 1937-1949. So, if you think a meshing of “Conan the Barbarian” (1982) and “Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves” (1991) with “The Wizard of Oz” (1939) sounds good, then you’ll probably like these movies more than me.

“The Return of the King” is just more of the same showcased in the first two movies, but even LONGER. Take the Battle of Minas Tirith, for example. It’s basically the same as The Battle at Helms Deep in the previous movie, except with colossal elephant-like creatures and the Army of the Dead. These two battles are similar enough that they could’ve been condensed into one conflict. Speaking of the Army of the Dead, this was an interesting new element, as was the horrifying spider-monster that Frodo & Sam face inside the caves.

Like the first two movies, the characters are diverse, the tale is creative, there’s a lot of dark action rounded out by softer scenes and everything LOOKS and SOUNDS magnificent. Unfortunately, as with “The Two Towers,” there’s excessive use of CGI (aka CGI porn). If cartoony CGI is your thang then you’ll likely appreciate this installment more than me.

There are other problems: While the characters are inspired, they’re also thin and rather uninteresting, at least for mature people who require more depth to hold their attention. Take Legolas (Bloom), for example; we never get to know him. Or consider Aragorn: Mortensen is perfect as the noble warrior, but in the ENTIRE trilogy he probably only has like two full pages of dialog, maybe three. Also, I found the story generally disengaging. I was never much enthralled by the characters and their pursuits, although devotees of Tolkien might be.

Then there are WAY too many “looks of love” between characters, particularly Frodo and Sam (I was so happy to see one character get married and have kids, if you catch my drift). There’s also a sense of redundancy, like the aforementioned battles (Helms Deep and Minas Tirith). Or consider the hokey dangling from a cliff by one’s fingers: This was already done with Gandalf at the end of the first part and beginning of the next. Did we really need the entire trilogy to come down to this type of eye-rolling cliché?

Another problem is the lack of feminine protagonists. There’s Miranda Otto as Éowyn, Théoden’s niece, who becomes infatuated with Aragorn and masquerades as a warrior-ess. Other than that all we have are cameos by Liv Tyler (Arwen), Cate Blanchett (Galadriel) and a Hobbit’s wife. “Mythica: A Quest for Heroes” (2014) cost LESS THAN $100,000 to make, which is a mere fraction of the $94 million it cost to make this blockbuster and the creators knew enough to throw in a couple of prominent babes as heroines in the story. So did “Conan the Barbarian” and “Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God” (2005). It’s not rocket science.

As noted above, the movie’s needlessly overlong and things could’ve been condensed in the trilogy or omitted altogether. When the main storyline ultimately ends at Mount Doom I was thinking there was maybe 12-15 minutes left with half of that time being credits. Nope, there was STILL 30 MINUTES LEFT wherein boring goodbyes and “looks of love” are tacked on.

Despite these honest quibbles, “The Return of the King,” and the trilogy in general, was an ultra-ambitious undertaking and is a must for fantasy/adventure aficionados, particularly those who favor Tolkien, Hobbits, Elves, Gnomes and the like.

THE MOVIE RUNS 3 hours 21 minutes and was shot in New Zealand.

GRADE: C

Review By: Wuchak
The best trilogy in the history of cinema
Best movie in the trilogy and sealed in the best possible way
Review By: auuwws
Awe-evoking.
**Warning! Mild Spoilers Ahead!!**

Sequels are inherently difficult to make and review review, because on top of the usual expectations for a film, everyone has to deal with expectations created by the previous films. Return of the King faced expectations equal to those of any other film, and like the protagonists at Helm’s Deep, fended them off and crushed them.

ROTK begins where “The Two Towers” concluded. As Gandalf said at the end of TTT, “The battle for Helm’s Deep is over; the battle for Middle Earth has begun.” Frodo & Sam are still moving toward Mordor; Merry & Pippin are hanging out w/ the Ents at Isengard; and the rest of the fellowship has defeated the Uruk-hai at Helm’s Deep. With Saruman defeated, the focus now shifts east, where man must make a final stand against Sauron, while Frodo & Sam attempt to destroy the One Ring.

As opposed to the breakneck opening scenes of TTT, ROTK starts slowly, but the early character development in lieu of action sequences is equally enjoyable and enlightening. Thank goodness for the deliberate beginning though, because if the intensity of the latter two-thirds of the film lasted for the full running time, paramedics would have been required on site to assist with heart failures and burst blood vessels, inevitable side effects of the remarkable tension that director Peter Jackson creates.

Speaking of Jackson, let’s hear it for him and his crew (pause for standing ovation).

That crew has once again created a mythical world without a trace of fictitiousness. Through the jaw-dropping visualization of massive battles, fortresses, monsters, and more, the cinematography and effects uphold and improve the standard set by the predecessors. Gollum now has more to work with as an “actor”, and the digital whiz kids step up to the challenge, blending him into the shots perfectly, particularly in a brilliant reflection scene. More sweeping battle scenes and more gorgeous landscapes are among the stellar shots lensed by Andrew Lesnie. The first shot of Minas Tirith stands to be my movie moment of the year; it will absolutely take your breath away. But the beauty lies in the fact that you scarcely know the difference between beautiful reality and equally natural effects. Outside of a couple apparent blue-screen shots, I never once doubted the veracity of the world of Middle Earth. Considering the enormity of that task, those at WETA Workshop who dazzled us with their talent deserve every award they get over the next couple months.

On the musical front, Howard Shore is back as composer, and his work shines as never before. He provides grand and booming orchestral sounds when battles require them, yet still manages to evoke emotion without lapsing into melodrama during poignant scenes. Mixing and tweaking familiar themes with new melodies, Shore literally hits all the right notes. For the audience, picking out recognizable themes, such that of Rohan or the Fellowship, and hearing how Shore has kicked them into a minor key or altered those last two notes is a thrill. His score is a joy to listen to, both as it seamlessly meshes with the film and on its own. Perhaps there can be no higher compliment.

Also of note is the use of vocal music voiced by the actors themselves, a technique that is new to the theatrical releases of LOTR. Of the two songs, I must mention the first one, which is utilized to stunning maximum effect. In a remarkable scene reminiscent of The Godfather, the song is sung over a scene that cuts between a character who made a decision and the grim consequences of that choice. The music, pictures, and variations in film speed combine for one of the best scenes of the year.

None of the acting work stood out to me, and by that I mean no individual was head-and-shoulders above the rest. I could still make a legitimate Oscar case for at least four cast members (Astin, McKellen, Mortensen, Wood), which is a tribute to the overall strength of the ensemble cast. Everyone fits into and builds upon their roles so very well, and the camaraderie that I’ve seen glimpses of behind the scenes carries over wonderfully.

The acting serves as a means rather than an end. A la “Band of Brothers”, the combined ten hours of film allow time for the characters to be developed and known, an advantage fully used in ROTK, which has more fulfilling scenes packed with emotion where we see decisions being made. Those scenes are what elevate this film to another level. On top of the nonpareil action sequences that shame other “epics”, it has a human soul, one that comes to the fore in final act, when the friendships that have been established take center stage. To me, friendship is the core theme of LOTR, and thanks to the fabulous acting of all participants, that theme is displayed in all its glory in ROTK.

WARNING! THE NEXT PARAGRAPH DISCUSSES THE CLOSING SCENES!!

In an unusual but welcome departure from the cinematic norm, the denouement of ROTK lasts a good twenty minutes after the climax. Too many movies, like “Matrix Revolutions”, wrap too quickly, leaving fates either unresolved or resolved, but sloppily and unsatisfactorily. Others, such as “Pirates of the Caribbean”, do have an extended ending but don’t require one and thus fill it with fluff. Here we find a perfect mean. Considering that Jackson and company have over ten hours of film and numerous character arcs to wrap up, twenty minutes is probably the minimum required to let the audience absorb all that has happened. After three or four possible end points, each of which concludes various stories, Sam returns to the Shire and enters his home, closing the door on both the camera and the trilogy. While the finish may seem odd, I consider it perfect. Sam has just come to the end of a fantastic adventure, a journey mirrored by that of the audience. The ending leaves each party back where they began, in a satisfying yet admittedly bittersweet manner. Like it or not, “I’m back.”

END OF MAJOR SPOILERS.

Is this film perfect? Probably not. Sure, certain characters like Denehor could have been developed more. But while that knowledge would have been helpful, the time it would have taken to expound on those people likely would not have been worth the knowledge gained. There are a handful of other cardinal sins, such as scarcely showing the ultimate villain and Arwen’s near random appearances. But most of those trace back to the original books, not to errors by Peter Jackson. The fact that the entire series works so well without fully disclosing many details speaks to the phenomenal power of Tolkien’s books and superb work in Jackson’s films. The bottom line is that nobody cares about the flaws because they’re entranced by the literary and cinematic magic on display.

Bottom Line: ROTK, the greatest final film in a trilogy of all time (go ahead…name a better one) culminates the best overall film trilogy ever, ten hours of film that transcend the medium. As I told my brother as we reluctantly but contentedly departed the theater, we will never experience anything like this again. EVER. 10/10.

Review By: Pavel-8

Other Information:

Original Title The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
Release Date 2003-12-01
Release Year 2003

Original Language en
Runtime 3 hr 21 min (201 min), 4 hr 23 min (263 min) (Blu-Ray Extended Edition), 4 hr 14 min (254 min) (Special DVD Extended Edition), 3 hr 12 min (192 min) (DVD Widescreen Edition)
Budget 94000000
Revenue 1118888979
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Action, Adventure, Drama
Director Peter Jackson
Writer J.R.R. Tolkien, Fran Walsh, Philippa Boyens
Actors Elijah Wood, Viggo Mortensen, Ian McKellen
Country New Zealand, United States
Awards Won 11 Oscars. 209 wins & 124 nominations total
Production Company N/A
Website N/A


Technical Information:

Sound Mix DTS-ES, Dolby Digital EX, SDDS, Dolby Atmos
Aspect Ratio 2.39 : 1
Camera Arricam ST, Zeiss Ultra Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses, Arriflex 35 IIC, Zeiss Ultra Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses, Arriflex 35 III, Zeiss Ultra Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses, Arriflex 435, Zeiss Ultra Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses, Arriflex 535, Zeiss Ultra Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses, Arriflex 535B, Zeiss Ultra Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses, Mitchell Cameras, Zeiss Ultra Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses, Moviecam Compact, Zeiss Ultra Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses, Moviecam SL, Zeiss Ultra Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses
Laboratory DeLuxe
Film Length 5,570 m (Italy), 5,600 m (10 reels), 5,557 m (Czechia), 5,600 m (Finland)
Negative Format 35 mm (Eastman EXR 50D 5245, Kodak Vision 500T 5279, EXR 200T 5293, SO214)
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format), Dolby Vision, Super 35 (Source Format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (anamorphic) (Fuji Eterna-CP 3513DI)

The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 2003 123movies
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 2003 123movies
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 2003 123movies
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 2003 123movies
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 2003 123movies
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 2003 123movies
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 2003 123movies
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 2003 123movies
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 2003 123movies
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King 2003 123movies
Original title The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
TMDb Rating 8.476 20,605 votes

Similar titles

The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes
Killers 2010 123movies
Gerry 2002 123movies
Static Shock Blackout 2012 123movies
Bright 2017 123movies
Simmba 2018 123movies
All the Old Knives 2022 123movies
Untamed 1955 123movies
Ten Tall Men 1951 123movies
Captain America: The First Avenger 2011 123movies
Copshop 2021 123movies
Van Helsing 2004 123movies
Openloading.com: 123movies