88 Minutes 2007 123movies

Watch: 88 Minutes 2007 123movies, Full Movie Online – In Seattle, the successful forensic psychiatrist and college professor Jack Gramm is in evidence since he was responsible for the condemnation of the serial killer Jon Forster, influencing the jury to sentence him to the death row. Jon accuses Jack of manipulation, inducing one witness and sister of one of his victims to testify against him. On the eve of Jon’s execution, Jack receives a phone call telling him that he has only eighty-eight minutes of life, while a killer is copycatting Jon, killing women with the same “modus-operandi” and is investigated by Seattle Slayer Task Force. With the support of associate Shelly Barnes, an FBI agent, his friend Frank Parks, and his assistant Kim Cummings, Jack investigates some weird and problematic students, a security guard of the campus and the woman with whom he had one night stand..
Plot: A college professor who moonlights as a forensic psychiatrist for the FBI, receives a death threat claiming he has only 88 minutes to live.
Smart Tags: #serial_killer #mysterious_villain #race_against_time #cell_phone_trace #erect_nipples #fbi_federal_bureau_of_investigation #murder #cat #red_herring #haunted_by_the_past #shooting_a_woman #telephone_terror #countdown #tv_news #watching_tv #timeframe_1990s #female_topless_nudity #sex_with_female_escort #womanizer #implied_lesbian_sex #cassette_tape_recorder

Find Alternative – 88 Minutes 2007, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	5.9/10 Votes: 76,651
	5% | RottenTomatoes
	17/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 916 Popularity: 11.585 | TMDB

Reviews:

People were over Exaggerating… Its not THAT bad…
I think that what people read our reviews is to find out whether or not the movie is worth the time or whether they should watch it so lets cut the crappy “I need attention” reviews okay… Yeah its worth the watch… it was fun and suspenseful to some people. Bottom line here is that it will not bore you. Have time on your hands? Need to watch a movie you haven’t seen? then just got for it. You will not be blown away but you will be entertained for the hour and 42 minutes it runs.

I mean truly, its a movie… Heres how I seen it, Did the movie entertain you through the time? yes. Was a bit predictable? yes. Did it at least attempt to come up with a good plot twist? Yes! I mean this is not Pacino’s best, but a decent watch none the less. I may not watch this twice on my own but if a friend didn’t see it, I’d watch it with them. This isn’t being soft on the movie either, it’s being realistic… It had a plot, wasn’t in my worst top 10, though it wasn’t in my best but truly, it wasn’t as painful as most threatened. Yeah we all wish that we can see another God Father or Scarface but less we forget, Pacino’s an amazing actor, NOT in any way shape or form A producer/ Writer. He played his character well but some feel the script could’ve been made a little batter or not at all… Sorry to say I think this had a better twist then Righteous Kill. The bad scripts are still scripts none the less, if anyone thinks they can do/ write that much better then maybe you should bring your ingenious script writing to Hollywood, till then, we will watch what we have. Not so bad of a movie OK, worth the watch in my honest opinion, please feel free to respond!

Reviewers make me mad!!! Now it’s my turn to do the same to you!!
I really do have to laugh at some people’s reviews at times, and over the years, if I totally believe all the bad press that some (if not all) films receive, it would never ever be worth my while visiting a cinema or buying a DVD ever again. If I see a film, like it, and then see all the bad reviews I am sometimes left thinking ‘am I the only one that got it?’ or ‘am I the only one that thought this was good’. In short, reading too many reviews can drive you absolutely insane. OK, so 88 Minutes received largely negative reviews……especially on IMDb. So at the time of writing this, the film has a rating of 5.9, which I class as just above average (5 is average right?). I am more than just a little annoyed that most of those that gave the film an above average rating failed to review it. However, it leaves me with the conclusion that most people are more than happy to complain, rather than go with the flow. After all, I don’t think that here are many films for which I haven’t read a review from somebody saying that it’s the worst film they’ve ever seen. 88 Minutes, in my opinion is a good, above average, watchable movie. But some of the contradictory comments on people’s reviews did my head in. For example:- Al Pacino’s performance…………Al Pacino is undoubtedly a brilliant actor. His character in this movie is cocky, self assured, calm and in his opinion, always right. Pacino plays this perfectly, so why do people think that he was out of place? Was there any need for him overstate and overact? No there wasn’t. Did he look uncomfortable in his role? No he didn’t. To me, maybe the reviewers were expecting some powerhouse acting which they didn’t receive. The plot………come on people!!! It wasn’t muddled. It was easy to follow. Throwaway yes, but don’t we, every now and again enjoy a film that we don’t have to think too much about? Yes we do!! It is true to say there is a certain degree of implausibility about things but people should just look at the movie for what it is…….entertainment. I, for one, was entertained, although I did guess who was behind the killings. I mean come on, even true stories have that certain implausibility factor about them in order to make them entertaining…don’t they? The acting……..it seems that because Pacino’s performance was (rightly) understated, everybody else acted badly. It is true that some performances did not bring out the best in the actors (Alicia Witt and Leelee Sobieski), others were excellent, especially William Forsythe and Neal McDonaugh.

I’m done with the film now, but had to laugh at one on the extras on the DVD. The director stated that this was a ‘low budget’ movie. OK maybe it is in comparison to some…..but calling $30m low budget is an insult to my ears!!

Anyway…….conclusion!! A good, but not brilliant film that a few more of you have actually enjoyed but not openly admitted. Good grief, those of you that have reviewed think it’s so bad, I am left thinking that I have just stepped out of the ‘bad movie’ closet!!

Watch this movie for what it is……..entertainment!!!

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 48 min (108 min)
Budget 30000000
Revenue 32593385
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Crime, Drama, Mystery
Director Jon Avnet
Writer Gary Scott Thompson
Actors Al Pacino, Alicia Witt, Ben McKenzie
Country United States, Germany, Canada
Awards 3 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby Digital, DTS (uncredited), SDDS (uncredited)
Aspect Ratio 2.35 : 1
Camera N/A
Laboratory FotoKem Laboratory, Burbank (CA), USA (film laboratory: Los Angeles) (as Fotokem)
Film Length 3,106 m (Portugal, 35 mm)
Negative Format 35 mm
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (master format), Super 35 (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (anamorphic)