Aliens 1986 123movies

Watch: Aliens 1986 123movies, Full Movie Online – 57 years after Ellen Ripley had a close encounter with the reptilian alien creature from the first movie, she is called back, this time, to help a group of highly trained colonial marines fight off against the sinister extraterrestrials. But this time, the aliens have taken over a space colony on the moon LV-426. When the colonial marines are called upon to search the deserted space colony, they later find out that they are up against more than what they bargained for. Using specially modified machine guns and enough firepower, it’s either fight or die as the space marines battle against the aliens. As the Marines do their best to defend themselves, Ripley must attempt to protect a young girl who is the sole survivor of the nearly wiped out space colony..
Plot: When Ripley’s lifepod is found by a salvage crew over 50 years later, she finds that terra-formers are on the very planet they found the alien species. When the company sends a family of colonists out to investigate her story—all contact is lost with the planet and colonists. They enlist Ripley and the colonial marines to return and search for answers.
Smart Tags: #alien #rescue_mission #soldier #monster #death_of_daughter #doll’s_head #acid_burn #strong_female_character #human_versus_alien #human_body_alien_host #action_heroine #xenomorph #acid #ellen_ripley_character #rescue #sequel #android #cat #trust #doll #screaming_girl

Find Alternative – Aliens 1986, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	8.4/10 Votes: 714,258
	98% | RottenTomatoes
	84/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 8056 Popularity: 52.847 | TMDB

Reviews:

A better sequel to ‘Alien’ than I was expecting.

‘Aliens’ – love the creativity, guys! – is a minute jot off the original but it remains a thoroughly enjoyable film – despite a slightly longer run time, which pleasantly doesn’t hamper events. Sigourney Weaver is terrific again; I can see why these films launched her career.

I will say parts of this 1986 flick are a tad repetitive from the original and a few bits are predictable, e.g. the arcs of Lance Henriksen’s Bishop and Paul Reiser’s Carter, but when judged overall it’s another entertaining release from this franchise.

I look forward to seeing if they made it a hat-trick with ‘Alien³’.

How do you do a followup to a classic like Alien? GIve it to James Cameron to amp it up to 10 with a bazillion aliens and a fantastic performance by Sigourney Reaver.

Gets better every time I see it
I am just going to add my voice to the chorus of praise for this movie. It is as near to being perfect as any I have ever seen. I will not say that it is much better than Alien – which is just about near to being perfect also. But I do love all the characters in this movie. I have rarely seen a movie where all the characters were so well developed. Even most serious dramas seldom develops each character so completely. None of these characters are stereotypes even Paul Reiser as Burke, although the slimy company/government man villain is a prerequisite in disaster type movies. I would almost say that my favorite is Michael Beihn as Hicks, just because I like his work & consider him to be underrated. But I also like Lance Henriksen as Bishop, William Hope as Lt. Gorman, Bill Paxton as Hudson, and of course, Jenette Goldstein as Vasquez. I liked all of these characters. I cared about their lives & deaths. The final scene for Gorman & Vasquez still chokes me up after seeing it many times.

I am not ignoring Sigourney Weaver or Carrie Henn. Ripley is the template for the modern action heroine. In the 24 years since Alien, few have been able to measure up to Sigourney Weaver’s Ripley. Even in Alien 3 & 4, Ripley was still powerful, despite the 3ed rate quality of the movies. As for Carrie Henn as Newt, she was the emotional heart of Aliens. Cameron’s ability to develop well rounded characters does not detract from his ability to create great action scenes or to scare the audience out of a several years of growth.

A functional plot built up with the most vivid and beautiful and demonic effects
Aliens (1986)

I had a revealing experience these last two days. I heard “Aliens” without watching most of it (I was in the other room). And the script is really really bad. I mean stupid bad, with these quasi military people fighting against the monsters and saying canned military things that are taken not from real army dialog but from other movies. The events really boil down to a series of missteps, and even though this band of Marines is made of tough “hombres” sure enough, they can’t seem to get along, or get things done, or even hold their overly heavy weapons up straight.

I did watch for part of it, and I have seen the movie more than once before, and I’m a fan of the first one, “Alien,” from 1979 (on the heels of the “Star Wars” craze). I expected it to be pretty good, like the first one, which has real character development and an original kind of premise. But…well, think again.

Hey, I agree with most–the set design, the sense of action, the light and camera-work, the whole larger than life experience of being in this forbidding place, this is all great. Even the over the top “movie music” is appropriately symphonic and big. There’s no way around the fact the movie is well made, and feels convincing in these palpable terms. It looks great top to bottom, and even on contemporary terms (we are a quarter century later as I write), it is sophisticated. It has aged well. If that were all that mattered–and for some it might be!–then all is well.

But for me, I was still thinking there might be some interesting, chilling plot to follow. This second installment, always confusing in its plural title “Aliens,” is filled with a combination of stale ideas (taken politely from the first round) and romping action adventure boy stuff. It is if more intense than the first (more fighting, more firepower), but it’s far less creepy. It has more goo, and more gore, but less horror, and less fear.

As with the original, the lead character is a woman, and indeed a whole bunch of the Marines are women, and so this is no simple manly movie. But it remains a macho movie, or a “machisma” one, and that will suit many viewers fine. But if you are remotely interested in the science fiction aspects, or even the terror of the first movie (which was truly terrifying), you might be disappointed to find you are continually battered instead. It’s great battering, but if you actually listen to the dialog (when there is any–the best parts of the movie are merely sounds), you’ll see what I mean.

James Cameron, the director here (and not the director of the first one, which is credited to the more original Ridley Scott), does the famous Cameron thing, playing a kind of “Star Wars” game of making an epic suited for about a 17 year old. Not that older people (and younger) can’t enjoy it, but movies have their target points, and that’s it here. You can see it in the dialog and plot, of course, but also in the overall feel of things, which is a combination of early computer games (1986 is a long time ago in those terms) and swashbuckler classics. It’s a vivid, fast movie.

You will notice, in retrospect, some “Avatar” features that are interesting, beyond just Sigourney Weaver. Foremost, this is a military affair, very right wing, go-get-em stuff, but with the admirable (American) rise of the individual above the chaos of both internal logistics and the logic of the evil outer world.

The monster? Monstrous. The famous designer H.H. Giger is not involved here except by carryover from the first. It’s a good thing he was the originator because the basic visual and sculptural quality of the monster, the planet, the ships, and the sets, is under Giger’s brilliant sway, and is a defining quality of the film. It makes no biologic or engineering sense, but so what? It looks great.

In all, clearly, there are amazing things here, taken on their own level. But there are discouraging ones, too, for those who are willing to pay attention. The little blonde girl at one point says, “Mommy…I mean Ripley, I’m scared.” And Ripley (Weaver) says, “I know, Honey. Me, too.” That’s the core of it all. Don’t forget your grenade launcher.

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 17 min (137 min), 2 hr 34 min (154 min) (special edition)
Budget 18500000
Revenue 183316455
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
Director James Cameron
Writer James Cameron, David Giler, Walter Hill
Actors Sigourney Weaver, Michael Biehn, Carrie Henn
Country United Kingdom, United States
Awards Won 2 Oscars. 20 wins & 23 nominations total
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix 70 mm 6-Track (70 mm prints), Dolby Stereo, Mono
Aspect Ratio 1.85 : 1
Camera Arriflex 35-III, Canon K35 Lenses, Moviecam SuperAmerica, Canon K35 Lenses
Laboratory DeLuxe, Hollywood (CA), USA (prints), Rank Film Laboratories, Denham, UK (processing)
Film Length 3,763 m (Sweden, 35 mm), 4,704 m (Sweden, 70 mm)
Negative Format 35 mm (also horizontal) (Eastman 400T 5294, 400T 5295)
Cinematographic Process VistaVision (special effects), Spherical
Printed Film Format 35 mm (Eastman 5384), 70 mm (blow-up) (Eastman 5384)