Body of Evidence 1993 123movies

Watch: Body of Evidence 1992 123movies, Full Movie Online – A lawyer defends a woman accused of killing her older lover by having sex with him..
Plot: When an elderly millionaire is found dead with cocaine in his system, his will leaves $8 million to Rebecca Carlson, who was having an affair with him. District attorney Robert Garrett decides to prosecute Rebecca, arguing that she deliberately engaged in wild sex with the old man to overexcite him and lead to his premature death. Defense attorney Frank Dulaney defends Rebecca in court while getting sucked into a dangerous affair with her.
Smart Tags: #erotic_thriller #female_nudity #videotaped_sex #sex_with_a_handcuffed_woman #blonde #woman_on_top #seduction #anal_sex #sex_scene #female_frontal_nudity #female_pubic_hair #cunnilingus #dying_during_sex #sex_toy #oral_sex #female_masturbation #husband_wife_relationship #female_removes_her_clothes #sexploitation_film #reverse_cowgirl_sex_position #cowgirl_sex_position

Find Alternative – Body of Evidence 1992, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	4.5/10 Votes: 15,422
	8% | RottenTomatoes
	29/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 248 Popularity: 18.81 | TMDB

Reviews:

It is both as bad as you remember it but somehow endlessly entertaining.
Body of Evidence: 7 out of 10: A woman is on trial for seducing men to death. Will her lawyer get her off? Will she get him off? Stay tuned for the drama both inside and outside of the courtroom.

The case for the Prosecution:

Exhibit A: The courtroom scenes: AKA half the bloody movie. Body of Evidence is often considered an erotic thriller. However, it spends an amazing amount of time in the courtroom. Now courtroom scenes can work in thrillers (see 1990’s Presumed Innocent), but they should be to the point and thrilling. The scenes here are pointless with half a dozen side characters introduced and then forgotten. It never feels like a real trial. The judge allows so many shenanigans that she makes Judge Ito look like Judge Judy.

Exhibit B: William Defoe: I genuinely like William Defoe. But as the lead character in an erotic thriller? As Weird Al Yankovic wrote about Mr. Defoe in his song “Ode To A Superhero”

And he’s ridin’ around on that glider thing And he’s throwin’ that weird pumpkin bomb Yes, he’s wearin’ that dumb Power Rangers mask But he’s scarier without it on

Now If William Defoe switched roles with Joe Mantegna as the prosecutor that might have worked a lot better. Both are wonderful charismatic actors but nobody wants to see William Defoe’s O face.

Exhibit C: Madonna: Madonna makes bad movies. This is a Madonna movie. Hence this is a bad movie. Prosecution rests.

The prosecution is feeling a bit overconfident there and rested their case without mentioning Anne Archer’s performance or the horrifying screenplay.

The Defense:

Exhibit A: Madonna: In 1992 naked Madonna was everywhere. People were buying $50 coffee books that consisted if nothing but pictures of her naked while hitchhiking. (This is true ask your cool aunt). As Rosie O’Donnell said to her in A League of Their Own. “You think there are men in this country who ain’t seen your bosoms?” What a difference twenty-six years makes. We are not inundated with Madonna nowadays (naked or otherwise) so she seems fresh again. Also, she really isn’t bad in this movie considering the lines she is given. She certainly gives a better performance than Anne Archer.

Exhibit B: Erotic Thrillers: Erotic thrillers enjoyed a moment between Basic Instinct and Showgirls. We really don’t see them like these anymore and haven’t for a long time. There were a lot of them in that time period (Heck there were two with Billy Baldwin for God’s sake) So we often will revisit the lesser known ones for some nostalgia much like future generations will watch Ant-Man and muse how they don’t make Superhero movies anymore.

Exhibit C: That one scene you forgot was in the movie: The defense is wheeling out a TV and DVD player. Looks like they are going to show a clip. The overconfident prosecution doesn’t object. Is that a young naked Julianne Moore? Wow, that sex scene is so intense. Where did that come from and how did Madonna allow herself to be upstaged.

The Verdict: In 2018 the defense wins. Time has been kind to this movie. I certainly understand the panning this received when it hit the local cineplex in 1992. For one thing, Madonna and Julianne Moore fighting over William Defoe sounds like a mental patient’s fan fiction. For another, this is a Netflix and chill movie, not something you want to see in a theater filled with suburban housewives and Paul Reubens. It is both as bad as you remember it but somehow endlessly entertaining.

Madonna is so sexy
I really enjoyed this movie because of Madonna, Madonna, and oh yes, Madonna. The plot is a joke, but Madonna steams up the screen considerably. This seemed like the perfect role for her, because it didn’t even seem like she was acting. She so adeptly teases and torments Willem Dafoe that the viewer just knows that she is this kinky and sexy in real life! Madonna, handcuff me and drip candlewax on me anytime!

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 39 min (99 min), 1 hr 41 min (101 min) (Australia), 1 hr 41 min (101 min) (Spain), 1 hr 41 min (101 min) (UK), 1 hr 42 min (102 min) (Argentina), 1 hr 41 min (101 min) (unrated) (USA)
Budget 30000000
Revenue 38000000
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Drama, Thriller
Director Uli Edel
Writer Brad Mirman
Actors Madonna, Willem Dafoe, Joe Mantegna
Country N/A
Awards 1 win & 8 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby Stereo
Aspect Ratio 1.85 : 1
Camera Arriflex Cameras and Lenses
Laboratory DeLuxe, Hollywood (CA), USA
Film Length 2,752 m
Negative Format 35 mm
Cinematographic Process Spherical
Printed Film Format 35 mm