Candyman 2021 123movies

Watch: Candyman 2021 123movies, Full Movie Online – In present day, many years after the last of the Cabrini towers were torn down, Anthony and his partner move into a loft in the now gentrified Cabrini. A chance encounter with an old-timer exposes Anthony to the true story behind Candyman. Anxious to use these macabre details in his studio as fresh grist for paintings, he unknowingly opens a door to a complex past that unravels his own sanity and unleashes a terrifying wave of violence..
Plot: Anthony and his partner move into a loft in the now gentrified Cabrini-Green. After a chance encounter with an old-timer exposes Anthony to the true story behind Candyman, he unknowingly opens a door to a complex past that unravels his own sanity and unleashes a terrifying wave of violence.
Smart Tags: #african_american #bee #hook #slasher_killer #based_on_urban_legend #hook_for_a_hand #mirror #swarm_of_bees #bee_sting #derelict_building #abandoned_building #hole_in_a_wall #vengeful_ghost #murdered_by_an_invisible_man #horror_icon #slasher #bloody_violence #urban_legend #different_face_in_mirror #urban_decay #housing_project

Find Alternative – Candyman 2021, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	5.9/10 Votes: 65,280
	84% | RottenTomatoes
	72/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 1166 Popularity: 33.09 | TMDB

Reviews:

I like the new Candyman. I don’t love it, but I like it a lot. This film co-written and directed by Nia DaCosta wants to be the Wes Craven’s New Nightmare of this franchise, and whenever it reaches that level, it hits a home run — especially when it comes to the eponymous monster, who has never been more sinister or menacing (Tony Todd, who originated the role in 1992, appears in a limited but effective capacity that transcends mere fanservice).

Speaking of 1992, DaCosta, who was three years old at the time, would not have been able to bring this project to fruition without the invaluable help of co-writers Jordan Peele and Win Rosenfeld, who know the material inside out and treat it with the same reverence that they it doubtless without inspired in them when they first encounter it in their teens. The filmmakers even get the comic relief right, and that’s not something too many horror flicks can brag about.

The original Candyman “was a horror movie that scared with ideas and blood, instead of just blood” (Ebert); the new version lives up to this standard, creating a foreboding atmosphere with practical special effects rather than CGI.

For example, mirrors are Candyman’s portal into our world, and the film makes the most of every reflecting surface — like when the protagonist, Anthony McCoy (Yahya Abdul-Mateen II) gets into an elevator that somehow doubles as hall of mirrors.

The present co-exists nicely with the past (another touch as brilliant as bringing Todd back is using Virginia Madsen’s voice on recordings made by her character in the first film) in Candyman, but the future is cause for concern.

This is not a remake, much less a reboot, but there is a ‘passing the torch’ — or, in this case, the hook — which I fear is meant to pave the way for more sequels. I can only hope that DaCosta, Peele, and Rosenfeld really appreciate Candyman as much as I think they do, and that having restored his dignity, they allow him to ride off into the sunset with it intact.

_Candyman’s_ story was intriguing and with spectacular visuals it is a decent watch, but for a horror film there was a significant lack of… horror. At no point in the film was there tension, dread, or a sense that I was being lead to a thrilling climax, it was more of a character study on Candyman. The character study aspect was great, I loved hearing the mythos of Candyman from different people in the community. The investigation into the backstory of Candyman paired with commentary on police brutality was really well done, but this was marketed as a horror film and it did not deliver. The cinematography was excellent, there were some really great shots utilizing mirrors and different angles but is that enough? In the end, this movie left me wanting much more.

**Score:** _58%_
**Verdict:** _Decent_

Good imagery and score. Inconsistent storytelling.
Nia DaCosta/Jordan Peele’s “Candyman” sequel (“Candymen” might have been better title) breathes new life into the 30 year franchise by finding a new angle to the story. It keeps the same type of classy direction of Bernard Rose and Bill Condon of the first two films, while tackling themes of gentrification, police britality, and artists’ mindless appropriation of violent tragedies. It links to the first film, while incorporating mythogy of the second film.

This movie is best appreciated at night with the lights off, and with headphones or a good sound system. John Guleserian’s cinematography is great, the narrative shadow puppets were cool, and Lichens’ score is consistently disturbing, while incorporating Glass’ score of the original.

The screenplay however is uneven. The conversation of gentrification is intelligent amd balanced. So is the coverage of artists being insensitive and uncaring about the victims of the violence they depict, while focusing instead on their own fame. But the police brutality story is uneven, and some references to recent events (“Say his name”) feel tacked on. The events depicted do match real life stories and can elicit empathy and rally against injustice. While Chicago police do disproportionately intervene African-Americans, and fheir is a history of brutality, an all-white modern day large Chicago police squad does not correspond with reality.

I dismiss others’ complaints that ‘all the victims are white’. No, not all are, and it is similar to the victim make-up of all the other “Candyman” movies: mostly white teen girls and white intellectual snobs, with the non-supernatural violence done by modern-day African-Americans against others, and in flashbacks, by racist whites. I will agree that the kill scenes themselves are inconsistently executed.

The bigger issue is that the story itself feels rewritten by people who did not agree on what was going on, and it falls apart in the last 20 minutes. The journey of Anthony’s character makes no sense, nor does that of Billy, his guide into Candyman mythology. His girlfriend Brianna, the wealthy art exhibitor, has a distrubing backstory revelead halfway that is never developed. Mutliple variations of the Candyman are described, but only a couple are shown. If there was a succession and another variant took over 45 years ago, then why do we instead have the original in the previous films? Shouln’t it had been the next one? At times they keep the original concept of Candyman as an urban legend of an atrocity that should not be mocked within ita community nor trivialized by outsiders, but then it is switched to a vigilante dishing out justice. The rules as to what happens when the name is called out are quite variable.

The acting is variable. The great Tony Todd is barely in the film. The child actors are good. Most of the snobby supporting cast overacts. Yaya Abdul Mateen II continues his streak of mixing in great acting with forced, overly conscious acting. Teyonah Parris does well with what they give her, and Colman Domingo is fine. Vanessa A. Williams steals the scene in which she is in.

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 31 min (91 min)
Budget 25000000
Revenue 77389310
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Horror, Thriller
Director Nia DaCosta
Writer Jordan Peele, Win Rosenfeld, Nia DaCosta
Actors Yahya Abdul-Mateen II, Teyonah Parris, Nathan Stewart-Jarrett
Country Canada, United States
Awards 8 wins & 20 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby Atmos, Dolby Surround 7.1, Dolby Digital
Aspect Ratio 2.39 : 1
Camera ARRI ALEXA LF, ARRI Signature Prime Lenses, ARRI ALEXA Mini, Angenieux Optimo and Fujinon Premier Lenses (some scenes)
Laboratory EFILM Digital Laboratories, Hollywood (CA), USA (color) (digital intermediate)
Film Length N/A
Negative Format Codex
Cinematographic Process ARRIRAW (3.4K) (4.5K) (source format), Digital Intermediate (4K) (master format), Dolby Vision, Spherical (source format)
Printed Film Format DCP Digital Cinema Package