Video Sources 12 Views

  • Watch traileryoutube.com
  • Source 1123movies
  • Source 2123movies
  • Source 3123movies
  • Source 4123movies
Castle Keep 1969 123movies

Castle Keep 1969 123movies

A one-eyed major and his oddball heroes fight a twentieth-century war in a tenth-century castle!Jul. 23, 1969105 Min.
Your rating: 0
5 1 vote

Synopsis

#123movies #fmovies #putlocker #gomovies #solarmovie #soap2day Watch Full Movie Online Free – Toward the end of World War II, a small company of American GI’s occupy an ancient castle. Their commander has an affair with the countess in resident. One guy falls in love with a Volkswagon. A baker among them moves in with another baker’s wife. A group of shell shocked holy rollers wander the bombed out streets. A GI art historian tries vainly to protect the castle and its masterpieces.
Plot: During the Battle of the Bulge, an anachronistic count shelters a ragtag squad of Americans in his isolated castle hoping they will defend it against the advancing Germans.
Smart Tags: #u.s._soldier #castle #battle_of_the_bulge #german_army #belgian #ardennes #volkswagen #aristocrat #satire #world_war_two #based_on_novel #painting_of_character #reference_to_peter_paul_rubens #title_same_as_book #aspiring_writer #reference_to_johannes_brahms #playing_flute #flautist #art_preservation #front_line #front_line_combat


Find Alternative – Castle Keep 1969, Streaming Links:

123movies Links | FMmovies Links | Putlocker Links | GoMovies Links | SolarMovie Links | Soap2day Links


Ratings:

Castle Keep 1969 123movies 1 Castle Keep 1969 123movies 26.1/10 Votes: 3,058
Castle Keep 1969 123movies 3 Castle Keep 1969 123movies 238%
Castle Keep 1969 123movies 5 Castle Keep 1969 123movies 2N/A
Castle Keep 1969 123movies 7 Castle Keep 1969 123movies 25.6 Votes: 46 Popularity: 5.267

Reviews:

***Avant-garde World War 2 flick full of amusing pretentiousness***

Two World War 2 flicks involving a European castle came out in 1968-1969, “Where Eagles Dare” and “Castle Keep.” If you’re a fan of war films you’ve no doubt heard of “Where Eagles Dare,” which is one of the greatest war action/adventure films ever made; but I wouldn’t be too surprised if you’ve never heard of “Castle Keep” or only vaguely heard of it. There’s good reason for this.

THE PLOT: The Germans are marching on a Belgium village in the Ardennes where a squad of American soldiers makes a stand at a 10th century castle.

“Castle Keep” has a lot going for it: a great cast, including Burt Lancaster, Peter Falk, Bruce Dern & more; fabulous Yugoslavian Winter locations & castle; thrilling action scenes; it’s well-made on a technical level by renowned director Sydney Pollack; and it hardly comes across dated, even though it’s fifty years old (as of this writing). Fans of the film describe it as “poetic” & “haunting” and it’s obvious the filmmakers were shooting for something groundbreaking, meaningful, artistic and amusing.

Unfortunately “Castle Keep” is mostly uninteresting until well into the second half, which is when the great action scenes start. The characters have a lot of dialogue but you never get to know them or care about them. Maybe because the chatter comes across as unreal, artsy and inscrutable. Here’s a sample: The Count comments to Theresa, his wife/neice, “They planned this war because there was something they hadn’t yet smashed.” She replies, “Who are we, Henri?” “We are the keepers.”

The script is full of such “deep” nonsense. Which I suppose would be okay as long as the story itself is captivating, but it isn’t.

Want another example of the “unreal” vibe? The soldiers go to the village with empty streets to kill time at the Red Queen, which isn’t a pub if you know what I mean. When they enter, all the prostitutes are standing or lying around in various tantalizing poses in lingerie. I’m sure they were just hanging around like that waiting for five soldiers to walk in. Why Sure! You gotta see it to believe it. I busted out laughing!

Speaking of which, I busted out laughing quite a bit throughout, which shows that the movie works as a satire or low-key war comedy.

A reviewer offered the interpretation that one soldier, the writer, is simply remembering how it was, not how it really was, and that’s why it comes across so dreamlike and bizarre. I find this a valid explanation. Others point out that it’s an allegory about the futility of the Vietnam War which was raging at the time of release. Another interpretation is that the message is one of contrast: Life from death, and death where once life was.

Actually, the symbolism is too obvious: The castle represents art or anything celestial created by humanity whereas the countess represents inspiration and the writer imagination. War is the ongoing destructive force that destroys everything in its path: The village and the bakery (home and business), the church facility (religion and faith), militarists and civilians, conscientious objectors (that is, those who embrace the folly of ABSOLUTE pacifism, which is different from LIMITED pacifism, as represented by the Allies) and, lastly, art (painting, sculpture, architecture, literature and music). The only thing it cannot kill is inspiration and imagination, which will continue to reproduce art despite the ongoing specter of war.

Hey, I’m all for “message” films with deeper meanings as long as the film itself is interesting and done with tact; the original “Apocalypse Now” (AP) is a good example. Much of AP is surreal, but you know the characters and care about their fate; plus, surreal or not, AP never departed from reality. “Castle Keep,” by contrast, contains parts that are SO contrived and unreal they’re actually funny (note, for instance, when Rossi meets the baker’s wife). The greatest sin in filmmaking is to be boring. The second is to be pretentious. Unfortunately “Castle Keep” commits both of these transgressions. But, thankfully, there are several amusing and thrilling moments. As far as the latter goes, the tower/plane sequence is great.

At the end of the day “Castle Keep” is an avant-garde film palatable to a chosen few. It was groundbreaking at the time but was doomed by its arty pretentiousness. I respect it and enjoy numerous aspects noted above, but I suppose it’s somewhat of a failed experiment.

The film runs 1 hour, 47 minute.

GRADE: B-/C+

Review By: Wuchak Rating: 6 Date: 2019-02-09
You can keep this movie.

Castle Keep, directed by Sydney Pollack and adapted to screenplay by Daniel Taradash and David Rayfiel from the novel written by William Eastlake. Starring Burt Lancaster, Bruce Dern, Patrick O’Neal, Jean-Pierre Aumont and Peter Falk. Music is by Michel Legrand and cinematography by Henri Decae.

Ambitious for sure, intriguing even, but ultimately a misfiring piece of pretentious tosh! An endgame allegory that finds Lancaster in WWII leading the defence of a medieval castle and its art collection against the German hordes. The action when it comes is savage and colourful, and Lancaster’s one eyed Major is good fun, it’s just everything else is masquerading as a near hallucinogenic anti-war movie mixed with euro pontifications. There’s some war is hell messages in the mix desperately trying to get out, either as satire or serious (it’s really hard to tell), but this is ultimately faux-art and painful to sit through until the explosions mercifully grace the last quarter of picture. 3/10

Review By: John Chard Rating: 3 Date: 2013-12-24
CASTLE KEEP (Sydney Pollack, 1969) ***
I had been wanting to check this one out for over 20 years (it used to be available as a VHS rental at the local outlet but I never got around to it) but especially after reading up on the film on the internet since its 2004 DVD release(s) where its unusual “artiness” a’-la Alain Resnais’ LAST YEAR IN MARIENBAD (1961) was played up. Now that I’ve watched CASTLE KEEP for myself, all I can say is that it’s arguably the strangest mainstream war movie ever and decidedly not for all tastes!

The relatively large cast (for what turns out to be an introspective film) is uniformly excellent and is well up to the requirements of the brilliantly surreal, funny and literate script; Burt Lancaster, wearing an eye-patch throughout, has an unsympathetic role as the formidable leader of a group of misfit soldiers taking over a Belgian castle against unseen invading German troops. He is skillfully abetted by Peter Falk (as a soldier who abandons his post to indulge in his vocation as a baker), Jean-Pierre Aumont (as the “degenerate” owner of the titular castle), Patrick O’Neal (as a celebrated art historian all at sea on the battleground but well in his element surrounded by the castle’s objets d’ art), Scott Wilson (as a soldier who gets into quite a unique relationship – more on this later), Tony Bill (as the most spiritual of the men) and, the other side of the coin, Bruce Dern as a Bible-thumping conscientious objector who walks the Belgian rubbles with his ragged band of revivalist deserters-followers. The terrific cinematography of the awesome European locations – courtesy of Henri Decae – is complimented by a fine Michel Legrand score and, when they finally come, spectacular battle sequences.

But it’s the odd, surreal touches – including Scott Wilson falling in love with a Volkswagen, the same car rising from the sea after it has been drowned by his envious companions and floating ashore all by itself, the moving sequence between Tony Bill and an unseen German soldier (subsequently needlessly shot by Peter Falk) where the latter teaches the former how to play the flute correctly, the unusually realistic talk of fornication, sexual organs, impotence, the ambiguous (perhaps ghostly) nature of the characters involved and the events being enacted, etc. – which really make this show stand out from the crowd of WWII spectaculars and stick in one’s memory – not to mention endear it to its legion of fans (who have famously decried online its original abominable pan-and-scan DVD incarnation, forcing Sony to re-release it in the correct Widescreen aspect ratio a mere four months later). The theme of the relevance of art in times of war brings forth comparisons to John Frankenheimer’s THE TRAIN (1964), also starring Burt Lancaster, whose third (and final) collaboration with director Sydney Pollack – after the previous year’s THE SCALPHUNTERS and THE SWIMMER (where Pollack replaced original director Frank Perry but goes uncredited) – this proved to be perhaps as a result of the critical beating the film received upon its original release!

Review By: Bunuel1976 Rating: 7 Date: 2007-08-05
A photographic masterpiece, but too much talk spoils the film.
There are some moments in this war drama that can be constituted as classic. A discussion with soldiers over changing sexual ethics; a conversation between an American soldier playing the flute and a hidden German soldiers who offers to make it sound better. The crossing of paths with locales near the Belgian castle nearing its 1,000th birthday. Pretty scenery, interesting individual characters and some entertaining and often ironic situations. Oh, and virtually plot less.

Burt Lancaster headlines as the one- eyed commanding officer, getting a historical viewpoint of the history as he plans how to get his troop out of there. Peter Falk delivers the typical cynical, acidic performance, taking the issue of the German flutist into his own hands. “I’m a soldier. That’s what we do.”, he says, following the analogy of the frog and the scorpion. Rarely in films about American soldiers do you see one where a character is as amoral and cold hearted as this one. Well, not until Tom Berenger in “Platoon” that is. The film hits its height nearing the end with an air attack that is quite brutal.

When the plot does finally kick in (essentially their story of survival and keeping the Germans from taking over the castle), you are engrossed with what’s happening, so it’s easy to be inclined to think that it’s a better film than it is. Going into Boris Karloff territory by basically playing exactly the same character that Karloff did in “The Last Patrol”, Bruce Dern goes way over the top. Jean Pierre Aumont plays the most idealistic of the men trapped in the castle, but the least defined. This movie is just one variation of the reminder of how far the second world war reached, and instills the theory that we can’t afford another one as it could be our last.

Review By: mark.waltz Rating: 5 Date: 2017-06-08

Other Information:

Original Title Castle Keep
Release Date 1969-07-23
Release Year 1969

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 47 min (107 min)
Budget 0
Revenue 0
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Action, Comedy, Drama
Director Sydney Pollack
Writer William Eastlake, Daniel Taradash, David Rayfiel
Actors Burt Lancaster, Patrick O’Neal, Jean-Pierre Aumont
Country United States
Awards N/A
Production Company N/A
Website N/A


Technical Information:

Sound Mix Mono (35 mm prints), 70 mm 6-Track (70 mm prints)
Aspect Ratio 2.20 : 1 (70 mm prints), 2.39 : 1
Camera Panavision Lenses
Laboratory Technicolor, Hollywood (CA), USA (color)
Film Length 2,935 m (Sweden, 35 mm), 3,670 m (Sweden, 70 mm)
Negative Format 35 mm
Cinematographic Process Panavision (anamorphic)
Printed Film Format 70 mm (blow-up), 35 mm

Castle Keep 1969 123movies
Castle Keep 1969 123movies
Original title Castle Keep
TMDb Rating 5.6 46 votes

Similar titles

Deadly Vows 2017 123movies
Alanis 2017 123movies
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes 2014 123movies
Hunter’s Creed 2020 123movies
Hostages 2017 123movies
90 ML 2019 123movies
Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close 2011 123movies
Kringle Time 2021 123movies
Devil’s Mistress 2016 123movies
Prom Night 2008 123movies
Falkenberg Farewell 2006 123movies
The Family Fang 2016 123movies

Leave a comment

Name *
Add a display name
Email *
Your email address will not be published

Openloading.com: 123Movies