Catwoman 2004 123movies

Watch: Catwoman 2004 123movies, Full Movie Online – Catwoman is the story of shy, sensitive artist Patience Philips, a woman who can’t seem to stop apologizing for her own existence. She works as a graphic designer for Hedare Beauty, a mammoth cosmetics company on the verge of releasing a revolutionary anti-aging product. When Patience inadvertently happens upon a dark secret her employer is hiding, she finds herself in the middle of a corporate conspiracy. What happens next changes Patience forever. In a mystical twist of fate, she is transformed into a woman with the strength, speed, agility and ultra-keen senses of a cat. With her newfound prowess and feline intuition, Patience becomes Catwoman, a sleek and stealthy creature balancing on the thin line between good and bad. Like any wildcat, she’s dangerous, elusive and untamed. Her adventures are complicated by a burgeoning relationship with Tom Lone, a cop who has fallen for Patience but cannot shake his fascination with the mysterious Catwoman, who appears to be responsible for a string of crime sprees plaguing the city..
Plot: A shy woman, endowed with the speed, reflexes, and senses of a cat, walks a thin line between criminal and hero, even as a detective doggedly pursues her, fascinated by both of her personas
Smart Tags: #catwoman_character #urban_gothic #comicbook_movie #black_superhero #bare_midriff #supernatural_power #interracial_relationship #black_woman_white_woman_relationship #female_female_relationship #lesbian_subtext #gender_in_title #race_relations #cat_movie #psychotronic_film #roundhouse_kick #karate #torture #motor_vehicle #ducati #car #u.s._car

Find Alternative – Catwoman 2004, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	3.4/10 Votes: 120,229
	8% | RottenTomatoes
	27/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 2897 Popularity: 19.802 | TMDB

Reviews:

1200+ 1 point votes? Get a life, people, it wasn’t that bad!
I scored a free ticket to this movie, and I thought, hey, I’ve wasted my whole life up to now, what’s another hundred and forty-one minutes? After all, I have a higher tolerance for crap than most people, and, once in a while, I like to see something that completely sucks. According to the critics and to voters on IMDb, Catwoman is supposed to suck bad. Fortunately, or unfortunately, depending on how you look at it, the movie really doesn’t suck. I mean, yeah, it sucks, but it hardly plumbs the depths of true suckitude. Currently it sits at #35 on the IMDb bottom 100, but I can think of way more than 34 other movies that suck far worse than Catwoman. It is much more fair to say that it is a mediocre, perhaps slightly below average, action film. It has a few pros and lots of cons. The cons first: 1) The jumpy editing is awful. 2) Way too much CGI. Same problem with the 500 pound gorilla comic book movie out right now, as well. CGI is probably the worst thing ever to happen to cinema; it’s hard to believe people are worshiping a technique that looks more fake than stop-motion. 3) Benjamin Bratt is a horrible actor, and the ugliest handsome man I’ve ever seen. 4) How the f*ck did Alex Borstein land a movie role? She should be doomed to die on MAD TV, the longest running train wreck of a show ever. 5) Crappy, crappy script. The pros: 1) The film looks wonderful, even though that’s due mostly to the CGI (I guess when it’s making buildings and inanimate objects like that, it’s not so bad). The costume design, even apart from the Catwoman outfit. And if they gave out Oscars to hair stylists, the ones who worked on this film would have no competition. 2) Sharon Stone – not a great performance, by any means. Her character is downright silly, perhaps even nonsensical. But she’s gorgeous and has a great presence. She makes a really boring villain somewhat more interesting. 3) Duh! Halle Berry! She might not have the best ability to choose roles. Perhaps she’s just obsessed with money, and now that she’s got a statuette, she’s going to do everything in her power to become a billionaire. Whatever you can say about her, she’s a great actress. Last year, she brought Gothika up a notch, and she does a lot to make Catwoman more entertaining than it ought to be. She plays the characters’ two halves, the sweet, insecure girl and the dominatrix, very well. And, come on, I’d be lying if I said I didn’t go to the movie because I thought Berry would be walking around in a leather outfit for a good portion of the movie. And, damn, she’s hot. This makes the movie watchable, if nothing else. There’s a shot where the camera circles Berry from toe to head right after she first dons the Catwoman which was worth the price of me embarrassing myself by handing my free pass over to the cute little theater girl at the counter. 5/10.

Try to make a worse movie–I dare you
Oh, where to start…imagine all the intellectual depth of Showgirls, plus all the excessive and ridiculous special effects of Charlie’s Angels, and then throw in some dialog crafted by whomever wrote for Governor Schwarzenegger’s Mr. Freeze in the fourth Batman movie, and only then are you even close to a movie as awful as this.

I suppose one should not expect much from a director who actually refers to himself as Pitof. But let’s come back to that. Let’s move on to Halle Berry. Note to Halle Berry: Letting Billy Bob Thornton ream you endlessly on camera is certainly degrading, but it was also a good career move–and you won an Oscar; feverishly eating catnip and licking people’s faces on camera, however, is not a good career move–and you’ll probably win a Razzie this time. They make you return Oscars for movies like this. Oh yeah, as for the supernatural explanation for Patience Phillips/Catwoman’s superhero status–she gets CPR from an immortal Egyptian cat–I am not kidding.

And then there is Benjamin Bratt, who happens to be a pretty solid actor, but could have very likely damaged a good career. If his participation in this movie isn’t enough to stigmatize him, then I’m sure he had to pass up a lot of good roles because of all the time he spent having his foot surgically removed from his former agent’s rectum. There is a scene in this movie–probably the worst, and that’s no small achievement–that is reminiscent of that ridiculous scene in Daredevil where Jennifer Garner/Elektra and Ben Affleck/blind superhero have a Kung Fu fight at a playground in broad daylight; in this movie it’s Halle Berry and Ben Bratt playing one-on-one hoops and her doing Catwoman flips and yet no one appears to be too amazed by this, much less pants-soiling surprised, and on top of that it has a sort of VH1/Color Me Bad/early New Edition video feel to it. And I’m really not sure what city this is all supposed to take place in–Gotham, Metropolis, the land beneath the whole in the cutting room floor–but apparently this place only has one detective, the unfortunate Bratt. No matter what the crime is–burglary, murder, domestic disturbance, interrupted ballet performance–he’s always there.

As for the rest of the cast, that annoying woman from Mad TV–I know that’s not specific enough; I mean the most annoying one who plays what I guess is supposed to be some bizarre Asian lady–well, she plays Catwoman’s annoying and sort of slutty co-worker comic relief since Rosie O’Donnell was apparently unavailable.

And then we come to Sharon Stone. Now I know her career is going down the crapper with all deliberate speed, but it’s still hard to understand this one. The only thing I can guess is that the opportunity to break into silly, pseudo-feminist diatribes made this a role she couldn’t turn down. Of course Sharon has often lamented the lack of good roles for older women in Hollywood, and she’s absolutely right about that, but this is not the best way to lodge a complaint, and plus that’s always been a little peculiar coming from an actress whose greatest cinematic achievement is the conspicuous exposure of her labia.

Briefly back to this Pitof character–I thought that pretentious one-named idiot who did the Charlie’s Angels movies–McG, I believe–was bad enough, but this guy is even more shameless and obviously lacking in talent. What’s with these guys who’ve never made a movie and are already going by only one name? Don’t you have to work up to that? I mean if is Scorsese wants to go by Marty, fine; if Tarantino wants to be just Quentin, or even just Q, whatever, but where does a hack like this get off using one name? This movie deserves every Razzie it receives, and while some reviewers may say it’s not really that bad, remember, it took a lot of money to make this godawful thing, and if people don’t speak out about how dreadful it really is, they just might make Catwoman 2. Can you live with that?

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 44 min (104 min), 1 hr 27 min (87 min) (Ontario) (Canada)
Budget 100000000
Revenue 82102379
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Action, Crime, Fantasy
Director Pitof
Writer Bob Kane, Theresa Rebeck, John Brancato
Actors Halle Berry, Sharon Stone, Benjamin Bratt
Country United States
Awards 13 wins & 8 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix DTS, Dolby Digital, SDDS
Aspect Ratio 2.35 : 1
Camera N/A
Laboratory Warner Bros. Motion Picture Imaging, Burbank (CA), USA (digital intermediate), Technicolor, Hollywood (CA), USA
Film Length N/A
Negative Format 35 mm
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format), Super 35 (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (anamorphic)