Crimes of the Future 2022 123movies

Watch: Crimes of the Future 2022 123movies, Full Movie Online – It sounds just as ambitious, taking a deep dive into the not-so-distant future in which humankind is learning to adapt to its synthetic surroundings. This evolution moves humans beyond their natural state and into a metamorphosis, which alters their biological makeup. While some embrace the limitless potential of trans-humanism, others attempt to police it. Either way, Accelerated Evolution Syndrome, is spreading fast. Saul Tenser is a beloved performance artist who has embraced this new state, sprouting new and unexpected organs in his body. Along with his partner Caprice, Tenser has turned the removal of these organs into a spectacle for his loyal followers to marvel at in real time theater. But with both the government and a strange subculture taking note, Tenser is forced to consider what would be his most shocking performance of all..
Plot: Humans adapt to a synthetic environment, with new transformations and mutations. With his partner Caprice, Saul Tenser, celebrity performance artist, publicly showcases the metamorphosis of his organs in avant-garde performances.
Smart Tags: #body_horror #child_autopsy #gore #eye_gouging #eating_plastic #organ_harvesting #organ_removal #surgery_without_anesthetic #facial_cut #corpse_in_freezer #drill_in_the_head #female_nudity #female_full_frontal_nudity #female_frontal_nudity #transhumanism #human_transformation #female_rear_nudity #dystopian_sci_fi #blood #murder #cult_film

Find Alternative – Crimes of the Future 2022, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	5.9/10 Votes: 26,321
	80% | RottenTomatoes
	67/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 562 Popularity: 29.136 | TMDB

Reviews:

FULL SPOILER-FREE REVIEW @ https://www.msbreviews.com/opinion-pieces/what-do-both-dont-worry-darling-and-crimes-of-the-future-have-in-common

“Personally, I believe that cinematic narratives with multiple plot points and questions related to the world itself are too often confused and envisioned as character studies driven by a single protagonist.

Both Olivia Wilde and David Cronenberg complete their movies when the main character fulfills the minimum requirements of their arc, consequently renouncing all other equally significant issues worthy of in-depth exploration. In the case of Don’t Worry Darling, one finishes it with an underwhelming feeling from an unsurprising conclusion, while in Crimes of the Future, viewers are left with several questions and interesting, half-developed paths about such a mesmerizing futuristic world.

Neither film explores its own world-building satisfactorily.”

Rating: B+

Nonsensical incoherent movie that was hard to watch, and i turned it off after 30 min.
It clearly written with a good amount of shock value, but the only shock i got was my finger to press “off” button.
Cronenberg has made some good body horror in the past, but this was just rubbish.

A Metaphorical Look At Ourselves
My thoughts on “Crimes” is more of a deep-dive into the metaphorical meanings within Cronenberg’s on-the-nose, satirical (albeit horrific) and sometimes humorous view of modern-day technology (ex: eating chair, sleeping bed, autopsy bed), exhibitionism and voyeurism (ex: Saul, Caprice, Timlin, two women with drills), pop culture (ex: Klinik/Ear Man, others), celebrity status (Saul and Caprice), and ultimately the “plastic” society that we have become (ex: plastic eaters, non-plastic eaters, and those “evolving” into eating plastic. There are also the “policing agencies” (Cope, Wippet, Timlin) that tries to regulate and/or terminate humanities permanent decline into a meaningless existence of seeking out ever-greater, “shocking” sensualities (ex: government’s attempts to regulate social media and the moral decline of society).

The story clearly identifies “plastic” as the synthetic, cheap, easily consumed and digested content in social media (I think of “Barbie Girl” by Aqua, Madonna’s “Material Girl”). Each of the main characters is participating in the so-called “art” in some way with a brief glimpse of a “normal person” who dies from eating “plastic”.

The boy Brecken, from the outset, has already “evolved” into a full plastic eater. The mother, representing parents of young “social media artists” today, smothers him. This represents the consequences of parents allowing their children to consume and produce cheap, easy to consume exhibitionism eventually leading them to be killed by it (ex: kids being killed by their stalkers, older men being fans of young girls) as if the parent was the actual murderer.

Through the entire story, the main character Saul resists “evolving” into a plastic eater (ex: “tumor-like organs” that grow inside him = the cancers of society) using alien-looking tech just to eat and sleep (Ex: cpap, hospital surgical devices, feeding tubes, mechanised beds etc). Finally, after just giving in to “evolving” into a plastic eater does he find complete contentment and peace. However, never does he realize that his “painless” exhibitionism is the very cause of his morphing into a plastic eater; he’s now desensitised to it all.

Along the way, we also meet two woman voyeurists who drill holes into people’s heads representing the mindless, intellegence draining people of YouTube Channels and pornography; they create content that displays to everyone their so-called “inner beauty” but is secretely “horrific” for us to watch, and we can’t turn our eyes away (ex: Adrienne, Ear Man, zipper device, etc.). In addition, Ear Man (Klinik) demonstrates how even the hippocritical Producer of his “Art” (ex: the music and entertainment industry) can be the very one who exploits the financial successes but joins the “popular” view of hating it (ex: anonymous likes, dislikes, etc.).

There are many more metaphorical references throughout the story and Cronenberg uses the genre as a warning of the future “horrors” of becoming “Plastic Eaters”. Cronenberg asks us If we are disgusted by what we are watching and thus why are we not disgusted by what we “consume” in today’s media? He suggests that if we are not disgusted by what we’re watching, we’re already a plastic eater. Indeed, ultimately society will become senseless, meaningless, painless, completely devoid of the characteristics that make us human if we don’t stop eating plastic both metaphorically (ex: social media, empty entertainment, exhibitionism, voyeurism, pop culture, celebrity status, etc.) and physically (ex: oceans being full of plastic-fish eat it, we eat the fish). Neither has any nutritional value.

The synopsis
Mortensen plays a grunting Sith Lord with acid reflux who’s constantly playing with himself. Then they talk about organs or something and sex but there’s never any sex and then Kristen Stewart appears a few times as a nervous crying lady who’s turned on by Mortensen. And then there’s subplots about child murder, poisonous candy bars, a dinosaur bone high chair that feeds you crappy raviolis, and a whole lot of other whacky stuff. Also Lea Seydoux is there and she helps cut Mortensen up. I really didn’t understand it but I sure had fun explaining it.

C?

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 47 min (107 min)
Budget 0
Revenue 4400000
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Drama, Horror, Sci-Fi
Director David Cronenberg
Writer David Cronenberg
Actors Viggo Mortensen, Léa Seydoux, Kristen Stewart
Country Canada, Greece, United Kingdom
Awards 1 win & 7 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby Digital
Aspect Ratio 1.85 : 1
Camera Arri Alexa Mini, Arri/Zeiss Master Prime Lenses
Laboratory Company 3 (color grading), DCS GREECE (dailies)
Film Length N/A
Negative Format CFast 2.0
Cinematographic Process ARRIRAW (3.4K) (source format), Digital Intermediate (4K) (master format)
Printed Film Format D-Cinema, DCP Digital Cinema Package