Video Sources 9 Views

  • Watch
  • Source 1123movies
  • Source 2123movies
  • Source 3123movies
  • Source 4123movies
Dahmer 2002 123movies

Dahmer 2002 123movies

The mind is a place of its own.Jun. 21, 2002101 Min.
Your rating: 0
6 1 vote


#123movies #fmovies #putlocker #gomovies #solarmovie #soap2day Watch Full Movie Online Free – Before his arrest and conviction for serial murders, chocolate factory worker Jeffrey Dahmer hunts Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for young attractive males to turn into unconscious (eventually dead) human sex toys, current acts which often prompt memories of earlier killings and of dealings with his suspicious but unaware father.
Plot: On February 15, 1992 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Jeffrey Lionel Dahmer, one of the world’s most infamous serial killers, was convicted of 15 counts of murder and sentenced to 937 years in federal prison. This movie is based on events from his life. Certain characters and events are fictional.
Smart Tags: #borderline_personality_disorder #serial_murder #serial_killer #murder #necrophilia #nonlinear_timeline #rape #strangulation #drugged_drink #severed_head #gay_club #blood #violence #based_on_true_story #chocolate_factory #male_rape #boy_strangling #character_name_as_title #graveyard_shift #male_bonding #homosexual

Dahmer 2002 Streaming Links:


Dahmer 2002 123movies 1 Dahmer 2002 123movies 25.6/10 Votes: 9,592
Dahmer 2002 123movies 3 Dahmer 2002 123movies 272%
Dahmer 2002 123movies 5 Dahmer 2002 123movies 263/100
Dahmer 2002 123movies 7 Dahmer 2002 123movies 25.1 Votes: 169 Popularity: 11.822


Better than the packaging suggests
Jacobson’s film shows little violence. That’s a point I’d like to stress because there is a certain audience I think will appreciate this film but who may not give it a chance because they expect graphic nastiness. Against the film’s interests, the marketing tries to sell the film to the cheap horror-movie audience and I think this is a pity.

Instead of depicting violence, Jacobson’s film discomforts you using dramatic means – principally writing and acting. All of which are used with enough skill to distinguish the film from cheap horror movies. It would be wrong and unfair to dismiss Dahmer because of its packaging. It is a well-written and performed character drama.

It’s subject matter is too horrible for the general drama audience to welcome, but at the same time its serious approach makes it too straight for the entertainment market. By that I mean the Hannibal Lecter/Seven audience, who prefer their serial killer tales abstracted (and therefore made safe) by the presence of movie stars.

Dahmer is more akin to Henry Portrait of a Serial Killer in being low budget, filled with unfamiliar faces, and focussed so much on the killer that there is no awareness of the authorities or justice in the story. There is no hero cop or FBI agent in pursuit.

Dahmer is very unlike McNaughton’s infamous film because, as already mentioned, it’s low on violence, but also because it’s a technically better-executed piece of work. The photography and editing, the use of music, the already-mentioned acting and writing, make this a surprisingly good-quality film considering the expectations stacked against it. One technical achievement I find worth noting is how well it recreates period. Sequences set in the 80’s have a visual authenticity that puts big budget studio attempts to shame.

Obviously, you know what kind of film you like. If what I’ve said above sounds interesting to you, then I recommend giving it a look. I repeat that you will not see much in the way of gore or violence. There are plenty of films with more graphic content dressed more commercially. Dahmer won’t make you feel good. It isn’t a fun movie. But if you are looking for something with more substance you may find it.

Review By: malcremin Rating: Date: 2003-07-01
A good, compelling, underrated piece of cinema
People seem really disgusted by the film, but the only thing that disgusts me are the negative reviews. This is a very well-made film that was put together on a very low budget. Films like this always have the immediate handicap of focusing not only on an evil, psychotic main character, but focusing on an evil, psychotic main character who we all know. There weren’t too many complaints about “The Talented Mr. Ripley” (a great film) focusing on a psychopath, but that’s because Tom Ripley is a fictional character. Like everybody, I believe that what Jeffrey Dahmer did was wrong, and I feel sorry for all the families who lost sons and other relatives due to him. But this movie was not made to portray him as a hero, nor a villain. It’s meant to portray him as a person. We all know about the crimes that Dahmer committed. But we don’t know about Dahmer himself. We don’t what drove Dahmer to madness, and what led up to the subsequent rapes, murders and eventual cannibalism. And the movie doesn’t try to shock us with gory details of these grisly occurrences, because that’s not its intention. There’s no use showing us what we already know.

I found this biopic deeply fascinating. I learned a lot about Dahmer that I never knew previously. I can’t say I relate to him that much, other than being lonely and an only child, but that didn’t stop me from seeing how he was as a human being. While watching the film, I said to myself, “How come we don’t learn much about his family life?” Maybe his family life had nothing to do with choosing to be that way. Not every serial killer commits murder because he was abused as a child. From the looks of things, he had a pretty well-to-do upbringing.

What I did get a sense of was his alienation and shyness. He felt his homosexuality served as a handicap in his society. And he wasn’t brilliantly sociable, so he didn’t have an easy time making friends or getting guys to go out with him, or have sex with him for that matter. But his perversions took him so far that he’d walk into a gay bar and slip roofies into guys’ drinks (which is shown in an extended montage), take them to the back and have sex with them as they’re helpless and passed out. It’s interesting to find out this can happen among homosexuals as well. There’s a long history of guys slipping roofies into women’s drinks to get them in the sack, so Dahmer was no different from any horny heterosexual guy, only he took it many steps further.

One thing I must criticize is the use of flashbacks. When I first watched the film, I had the impression that the whole movie was about young Jeffrey Dahmer and the story was told in a linear fashion. But after watching the featurette and watching it a second time with the commentary, I realized that the movie was bouncing back and forth from Jeffrey in his later years to Jeffrey in his earlier years. I personally didn’t think slapping facial hair on him made him look much older. He still looked like he was in his twenties, so I had no hint of his aging. Once I watched it a second time, the story became much more clear to me, but others watching it for the first time might get confused as well.

I liked the use of lighting. Jeffrey’s room is lit completely red, giving it almost a hell-ish appearance. And towards the end, the lighting becomes much darker, as Dahmer becomes more evil.

The performances are good all-around. Jeremy Renner does an incredible job at playing Dahmer, expressing a laundry list of emotions with his face and body language alone. I kept trying to recall where I saw him before, since his face looked very familiar, and then I checked his filmography and found out he was in “National Lampoon’s Senior Trip.” Of course, this movie gave him a much better opportunity at showing off his acting abilities. Talented, underrated actor Bruce Davison makes a few appearances as Dahmer’s father, also doing an incredible job the 10 minutes-or-so he’s on screen.

Though I found the film fascinating and thought-provoking, I still wish I could’ve learned a little more about what drove Dahmer to madness. The director mentioned it wasn’t his intention to give backstory on Dahmer’s life, and instead make it an emotional drama, but it would’ve made the film more interesting. But one scene that caught me completely by surprise was when young Jeffrey cringing when cutting up one of his victim’s bodies and eventually bursting into tears. I’m sure his remorse decreased over the years, but I don’t ever visualize a serial killer feeling shame about his victims. I saw John Liszt (sp) in an interview once and he described his methods of mutilating his victims without batting an eye. So this is not exactly the movie’s cue to have the audience feel sorry for Dahmer and cry along with him, but it’s enlightening to find out that had emotions as well. He was just so driven by his psychological sicknesses that his emotions couldn’t hinder him.

My score: 8 (out of 10)

Review By: mattymatt4ever Rating: 8 Date: 2003-01-17

Other Information:

Original Title Dahmer
Release Date 2002-06-21
Release Year 2002

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 41 min (101 min)
Budget 250000
Revenue 144008
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Biography, Crime, Drama, Horror, Thriller
Director David Jacobson
Writer David Jacobson
Actors Jeremy Renner, Bruce Davison, Artel Great, Matt Newton
Country USA
Awards 3 nominations.
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby Digital
Aspect Ratio 1.85 : 1
Camera Panavision Cameras and Lenses
Laboratory N/A
Film Length N/A
Negative Format 35 mm
Cinematographic Process Spherical
Printed Film Format 35 mm

Original title Dahmer
TMDb Rating 5.1 169 votes

Similar titles

She Wolf Rising 2016 123movies
Chasing Ghosts 2014 123movies
Tie Me Up! Tie Me Down! 1990 123movies
Saving You, Saving Me 2019 123movies
Private Number 2015 123movies
The Blazing World 2021 123movies
Beauty 2011 123movies
Hotel 2013 123movies
Afterword 2009 123movies
Sleepwalker 2022 123movies
Brazen 2022 123movies
Les Misérables 2012 123movies