What's happening?


Your internet provider under law REPORT streaming of pirated content! Your Browser & OS leaks your IP data - !

Video Sources: 94 Views

Dunkirk 2017 123movies

Dunkirk 2017 123movies

Survival is Victory107 Min.
Your rating: 0
5 1 vote

Summary:

#123movies #fmovies #putlocker #gomovies #solarmovie #soap2day Watch Full Movie Online Free – Evacuation of Allied soldiers from Belgium, the British Empire, and France, who were cut off and surrounded by the German army from the beaches and harbor of Dunkirk, France, between May 26- June 04, 1940, during Battle of France in World War II.
Plot: The story of the miraculous evacuation of Allied soldiers from Belgium, Britain, Canada and France, who were cut off and surrounded by the German army from the beaches and harbour of Dunkirk between May 26th and June 4th 1940 during World War II.
Smart Tags: #world_war_two #1940s #soldier #beach #evacuation #military #world_war_two_in_france #air_attack #yacht #sinking_ship #survival #english_channel #rescue_mission #year_1940 #airforce_pilot #military_officer #army #spitfire #royal_air_force #royal_navy #rescue


Dunkirk 2017 Streaming Links:


Ratings:

Dunkirk 2017 123movies 1 Dunkirk 2017 123movies 27.8/10 Votes: 562,621
Dunkirk 2017 123movies 3 Dunkirk 2017 123movies 292%
Dunkirk 2017 123movies 5 Dunkirk 2017 123movies 294/100
Dunkirk 2017 123movies 7 Dunkirk 2017 123movies 27.5 Votes: 12618 Popularity: 39.291

Reviews:

Very good.

‘Dunkirk’, as you’d expect given the director, is extremely well made. I particularly enjoyed how the film is shot, the sound editing and the score. It’s a watchable story about an event from World War II.

I wouldn’t, personally, say there’s a standout cast performer. I don’t mean that negatively, it’s just more a film about a group of people rather than individuals – which I assume was the intention. There are still good performances, from the likes of Tom Glynn-Carney and Jack Lowden. It also features star names, including Tom Hardy, Cillian Murphy and Mark Rylance.

The music and how the sequences are crafted is what elevates this film up, while the pacing is almost spot on – they could easily have made this 2hr 15mins+, like most war films seem to do, but keeping it at around 1hr 47mins was a smart choice. I do still feel like it could’ve been greater, yet I still got entertainment from it.

Review By: r96sk Rating: 8 Date: 2021-01-02
Tense film draws you to a doomed group.

Those how are veteran war historians will quibble at some parts of Dunkirk, notably the separation of English and French troops in evacuation and the ships used to evacuate them. Dunkirk uses a few conceits to keep you involved. The first, which adds a notable amount of tension to the film, is a ticking clock in the background moving you to the final day. We see intercut scenes from different periods, prior, during and enacting the rout.

Acting is excellent throughout, and versimilitude is achieved with models of aircraft, uniforms, landing stages and so on. Injections of friendship and subsequent loss direct our affection to the sufferers. Harry Styles is more than competent as a young troop and Kenneth Branagh brings integrity and verve to his role as a tired and firm leader. If one oversight might have been addressed, it is the lack of focus on the German side of things in this affair. Our few glimpses are of German fighters and so on, with very explanation of the goings-on at the front.

Overall an excellent war movie meant to be among your top ten, if not top five (It will be hard to dislodge All Quiet on the Western Front, Apocalypse Now, Paths of Glory, Saving Private Ryan and Tora Tora Tora!, among others). Recommend highly a good 8/10.

Review By: Pierre_D Rating: 8 Date: 2017-08-04
Hipsterish affectation of an “artistic” war movie.
This movie is so paper thin I really can’t write much about it. So many missed opportunities in a film about one of the most spectacular and complex battles of WWII. I can see what Nolan tried to do here, a kind of British “Thin Red Line” (there’s even wind in the grass, lol, i kid you not), but he failed spectacularly. There are no memorable characters to be found here, and one wonders even if there are any actual characters at all. Not one, not one of them has any semblance of a character arc. Not one. Again, I see how Nolan tried to convey the impersonality of war and insignificance of the individual but he did it with such a heavy, clumsy hand, providing us with no counterpoint with which to drive the point home. It’s basic screen writing stuff really. I’d expect such ineptitude from a first year film student but not from a supposed “master of the craft”.

But anyways, this could have been forgivable if the film was more about the event itself, but it fails at that too. After watching the film, you’d be given to believe that the Battle of Dunkirk was fought by three Spitfires (100 were lost over the beeches alone), 1 German heinkel, a couple of stukas, 2 destroyers or a dozen or so boats… Oh yes and maybe a few hundred men standing quietly on a beach, doing nothing except desperately trying to look morose and dejected in a faintly passive-aggressive way. It’s ridiculous. We are talking about total and absolute chaos happening there, hundreds of thousands of rifles alone discarded on the beach, not to mention guns, artillery, trucks… Burning and sinking ships of all sizes all across the horizon, parts of beaches inaccessible from rotting corpses washing up with tides. This was actually way bigger than D-Day landings in terms of men and equipment stuffed in a very small patch of land. Half a million desperate men stuffed in a small town, bombarded incessantly and under constant attack from bombers. Where did all those people defecate, what did they eat ffs? I wanted to know that, really. That at least would have given some much needed humanity to the so-called-characters Nolan keeps yanking around like so much puppets. So many missed opportunities there…

If Nolan wanted to do a tight little film about isolation and desperation of being on the loosing side of the war, he had plenty of other places and battles to choose from. Just ask around. Or if he simply had to insist on Dunkirk, then we should have seen this total chaos all around our protagonists, in the background at least – that would have served as a really powerful, so desperately needed counterpoint to the individual suffering and heroism.

And this brings me to the final point. The movie is one tone only. A monotone repetition of sights and emotions we’ve seen and experienced before. No one cracks a joke. No one really breaks down. No one has an embarrassing moment. There are no ups and downs, it’s just some morose faceless robots performing obvious actions leading towards a bleedingly obvious goal. One single emotional and narrative tone from the beginning to the end. The entire emotional and narrative content of the movie would have fit snugly into a 20 minute short, and that is pretty much how long it takes before you start yawning. The best thing that can be said about the movie is that individual scenes are well directed and worth experiencing. But that is the real problem here – the film is constructed as a series of impressive “experiences” rather than cohesive piece of drama (And this particular historical event is almost uniquely stuffed with dramatic opportunities. It’s almost as if golden-age Hollywood writers wrote the script for the actual event.) In other words, it’s a Dunkirk theme park rather than a movie. You take rides. And that’s it. And even those become repetitive after a while.

Review By: mraos Rating: 6 Date: 2017-07-22
Devastatingly Disappointed
-Contains Spoilers-

After reading such amazing universal critical praise, my less than stellar experience of watching Dunkirk obligated me to write my first ever review on IMDb. I am a big fan of Christopher Nolan, in many ways I think he has truly changed cinema and how we experience film. I would go as far as to call him a visionary artist. This is why Dunkirk truly baffled me.

Let’s think about the technical facts of the Dunkirk evacuation, it is said over and over in the film that there are 300,000 men on the beach. We see maybe 1,000. A mass evacuation this scale took hundreds and hundreds of vessels. We see upwards of 30-40. And the Luftwaffe was definitely assailing the beach, yet in the film we see a paltry 8 planes. There is something missing here, it’s called “scale”. This film has a complete dearth of it. And that is a shame and blaspheme to the experience of the true Dunkirk evacuation.

Beyond the obvious factual incongruities, there are glaring narrative holes. We have no connection to these characters, they seem cold and distant from us. There is no character development whatsoever in the film. I understand that Nolan was trying to show the entire character of the Dunkirk evacuees, but again we only saw a minuscule few hundred of what was supposed to be 300,000 so this argument is moot to me. We don’t even get to see one Nazis either, so the “grand villain” that was forcing the evacuation was never even on the screen!!!!

The score and the sound design have been mentioned by many reviewers, and again I was so underwhelmed. There have been so many better films for both scores and sound design, too many to list actually. Yes, there is some stellar cinematographer, but we expect that from Mr. Nolan.

Finally, I’ve heard and read “One of the best war films ever” so many times now. Give me a break. There are many many better war films- Ran, The Bridge on the River Kwai, Apocalypse Now, Full Metal Jacket, The Thin Red Line, and Saving Private Ryan to name just a few. I’d suggest you rent or buy one of these instead of watching Dunkirk. I wouldn’t waste my time viewing this film again. I hope Nolan’s next film is far better.

Review By: will-reed Rating: 3 Date: 2017-07-28

Other Information:

Original Title Dunkirk
Release Date 2017-07-19
Release Year 2017

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 46 min (106 min)
Budget 100000000
Revenue 525573161
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Action, Drama, History, Thriller, War
Director Christopher Nolan
Writer Christopher Nolan
Actors Fionn Whitehead, Damien Bonnard, Aneurin Barnard, Lee Armstrong
Country UK, Netherlands, France, USA
Awards Won 3 Oscars. Another 60 wins & 229 nominations.
Production Company Warner Bros. Pictures, IMAX Corporation
Website N/A


Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby (5.1), Sonics-DDP, Dolby Digital
Aspect Ratio 1.43 : 1 (IMAX 70mm – most scenes), 1.78 : 1 (IMAX Blu-ray and 4K UHD – most scenes), 1.90 : 1 (Digital IMAX – most scenes), 2.20 : 1 (70mm and Digital), 2.39 : 1 (35mm)
Camera IMAX MKIV, Panavision Sphero 65 and Hasselblad Lenses, IMAX MSM 9802, Panavision Sphero 65 and Hasselblad Lenses, Panavision 65 HR Camera, Panavision Sphero 65 Lenses, Panavision Panaflex System 65 Studio, Panavision Sphero 65 Lenses
Laboratory FotoKem Laboratory, Burbank (CA), USA (prints)
Film Length N/A
Negative Format 65 mm (horizontal) (Kodak Vision3 50D 5203, Vision3 250D 5207, Vision3 200T 5213, Vision3 500T 5219)
Cinematographic Process Dolby Vision, IMAX (source format), Panavision Super 70 (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (anamorphic) (Kodak Vision 2383), 70 mm (also horizontal) (also IMAX DMR blow-up) (Kodak Vision 2383), D-Cinema

Dunkirk 2017 123movies
Dunkirk 2017 123movies
Dunkirk 2017 123movies
Dunkirk 2017 123movies
Dunkirk 2017 123movies
Dunkirk 2017 123movies
Dunkirk 2017 123movies
Dunkirk 2017 123movies
Dunkirk 2017 123movies
Dunkirk 2017 123movies
Original title Dunkirk
TMDb Rating 7.5 12,618 votes

Similar titles

Hearts in Atlantis 2001 123movies
Zorba the Greek 1964 123movies
Suicide Squad 2016 123movies
Henry Poole Is Here 2008 123movies
The Lucky One 2012 123movies
Hillbilly Elegy 2020 123movies
Broken City 2013 123movies
Patriot Games 1992 123movies
The Jungle Book 2016 123movies
Hitchcock 2012 123movies
Skiptrace 2016 123movies
The Queen 2006 123movies
Openloading.com: 123Movies