Elvis 2022 123movies

Watch: Elvis 2022 123movies, Full Movie Online – The life of American music icon Elvis Presley, from his childhood to becoming a rock and movie star in the 1950s while maintaining a complex relationship with his manager, Colonel Tom Parker..
Plot: The life story of Elvis Presley as seen through the complicated relationship with his enigmatic manager, Colonel Tom Parker.
Smart Tags: #reference_to_elvis_presley #based_on_true_story #singing #singer #career #rock_music #famous_singer #christmas #based_on_real_person #death_of_mother #manager #legend #concert #guitar #based_on_real_people #stage #carnival #elvis_presley_character #male_protagonist #rock_’n’_roll #famous_song

Find Alternative – Elvis 2022, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	7.4/10 Votes: 144,146
	77% | RottenTomatoes
	64/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 1840 Popularity: 73.32 | TMDB

Reviews:

I found this movie to be fairly entertaining and, if mostly accurate, how much damage a con man can do to a performer’s career, and indeed their life, if they are unscrupulous and greedy. I had heard that the man who called himself Colonel Parker had forced songwriters to give Presley writing credits before he would let him perform their songs, but I had never dug deep enough to learn how badly he was duping his own client and supposed friend.

And as often seems to happen with celebrities with fame and money, drugs appear to have shortened Elvis’s life. With early rock stars or those living that lifestyle, overdoses often did them in. But With the likes of Judy Garland and Elvis, it was prescription drugs that slowly caused their lives to ebb away. A sad story in many ways. I would have liked to see him more as a father and husband. But the acting, writing and the story of his musical journey was enough to keep me interested. It was funny, but when they related at the end the postscripts to the lives, their description of Colonel Parker’s final years seemed designed to elicit pity or ”serves him right.” But in a weird way, I wonder if her was content powering down his life in Vegas gambling his fortune away. Who else would he leave it to?

MORE SPOILER-FREE REVIEWS @ https://www.msbreviews.com/

“Elvis features a glorious, electrifying, iconic performance from Austin Butler that will deservedly guarantee him all the awards of the year.

Unfortunately, the actor isn’t enough to overcome the many technical issues, besides Tom Hanks’ massive miscast and the formulaic musical biopic narrative. Baz Luhrmann’s style theoretically fits the legendary singer’s vibrant aura, and the filmmaker’s intention is clear.

Nevertheless, the frenetic, choppy editing and the restless camera movements rather come off as a messy, confusing, headache-inducing atmosphere instead of elements that elevate the overall piece. The unnecessarily hefty doesn’t help.

I was hoping to be surprised, but then again, I’m admittedly not the biggest Elvis/Luhrmann fan.”

Rating: C+

Entertaining, But Can’t Get Out Of Its Own Way Enough To Be Great
There are certainly times in which Baz Luhrmann’s “Elvis” is an engaging and entertaining biopic of rock-and-roll’s biggest star. The performance numbers are often incredible and Austin Butler inhabits all aspects/ages of the lead role adeptly. Unfortunately, Luhrmann’s let’s say “unique” style of filmmaking can’t quite get out of its way long enough (especially in the early goings) for this to be a top-notch flick.

For a very basic overview, “Elvis” tells the story of the titular character (played by Butler) from childhood all the way through his Vegas residency at the end of his career. The narrative frame comes from the voice of Colonel Parker (Tom Hanks), Presley’s manager and quasi-abuser (largely in the financial department). Elvis’s relationship to “black music”, teen heartthrob fame, military service, and late-60s comeback are all given time here, including his marriage to Priscilla (Olivia DeJonge).

Perhaps the most notable thing to mention about “Elvis” is that the first 30-45 minutes are kind of a mess. Luhrmann is in peak wackadoodle form (granted, what else could be expected from the director of 1996’s “Romeo + Juliet”), what with jarring time-cuts, crazy montages (one that turns the proceedings into a comic book!), and quite a bit of time spent on the bizarre Hanks Parker portrayal. There is also a far-too-on-the-nose scene in which a young Presley supposedly learns his later musical style via an R&B jam session and a revival ministry happening concurrently. I’d blame no one for thinking this was a total mess before the 1 hour mark.

Fortunately, in this case, there is still 2 hours left of “Elvis”, and that’s when it settles into being a pretty entertaining film. Basically, once all the crazy material is out of the way and audiences can just settle into Butler’s portrayal, there is a lot to like. I was really impressed with Butler’s ability to portray the young rebellious Elvis, as well as the fat, worn-down-by-life version. The staged musical numbers are every bit as good as those found in recent musical biopics like Rocketman or Bohemian Rhapsody. I’ll certainly be revisiting some Presley tunes after seeing this.

Overall, I can’t put “Elvis” in my top tier (Walk the Line, Love & Mercy, & Judy) of biopics because its director seems almost physically unable to “tell it straight” when this film and acting performances would have certainly been good enough for that grounded approach. But it was easily good enough to hold my interest and take me on an interesting journey through the iconic musician’s entire career.

A huge letdown
I’ll be short here. I’m familiar with Elvis. Kurt Russel played the best Elvis on screen. The ’79 movie is simply better on every level and on top of that you hear Elvis sing and you see someone on screen that looks pretty much like him. (In this movie you hear the actor sing while he doesn’t even look like Elvis.)

I found the story to be hugely inconsistent and inaccurate.

All the random songs in the movie felt off.. The characters were shallow and inconsistent. The only parts in the movie that were good are the ones made after recordings..

This was made for people that don’t know anything about Elvis.

I’d bet the majority actually thinks that he was singing in the movie.

It was a movie based on Elvis’s life. Based on!

If you liked this movie, go and see the ’79 version.

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 39 min (159 min)
Budget 85000000
Revenue 286000000
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Biography, Drama, Music
Director Baz Luhrmann
Writer Baz Luhrmann, Sam Bromell, Craig Pearce
Actors Tom Hanks, Austin Butler, Olivia DeJonge
Country United States, Australia
Awards 2 wins & 24 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby Digital, IMAX 6-Track, Dolby Surround 7.1
Aspect Ratio 2.39 : 1
Camera Arri Alexa 65, Panavision Primo, Sphero 65, T-Series “Elvis” and Petzval Lenses, Arri Alexa LF, Panavision Sphero 65 and T-Series “Elvis” Lenses (some shots)
Laboratory The Post Lounge, Brisbane, Australia (digital intermediate)
Film Length N/A
Negative Format Codex
Cinematographic Process ARRIRAW (4.5K) (6.5K) (source format), Digital Intermediate (4K) (master format), Panavision (anamorphic) (source format)
Printed Film Format D-Cinema