What's happening?


Your internet provider under law REPORT streaming of pirated content! Your Browser & OS leaks your IP data - !

Video Sources: 16 Views

Evil Angels 1988 123movies

Evil Angels 1988 123movies

A family torn apart. A public filled with outrage. A woman accused of murder.120 Min.
Your rating: 0
7 1 vote

Summary:

#123movies #fmovies #putlocker #gomovies #solarmovie #soap2day Watch Full Movie Online Free – Based on the true story of Lindy Chamberlain. During a camping trip to Ayers Rock in outback Australia, she claimed that she witnessed a dingo stealing her baby daughter, Azaria, from the family tent. Azaria’s body was never found. Police noted some apparent inconsistencies in her story, and she was charged with murder. The case attracted a lot of attention, turning an investigation into a media circus, with the public divided in their opinions.
Plot: Based on the true story of Lindy Chamberlain who, during a family camping trip to Ayers Rock in central Australia, claimed she witnessed a dingo take her baby daughter, Azaria, from their tent. Azaria’s body was never found and, after investigations and two public inquests, she is charged with murder.
Smart Tags: #dingo #australia #australian_outback #wrongful_imprisonment #religious_prejudice #religious_persecution #prejudice #child_killed_by_animal #miscarriage_of_justice #death_of_child #based_on_true_story #watching_tv #tent #ayers_rock #media #injustice #reference_to_god #controversy #judiciary #acquittal #happy_ending


Evil Angels 1988 Streaming Links:


Ratings:

Evil Angels 1988 123movies 1 Evil Angels 1988 123movies 26.9/10 Votes: 9,429
Evil Angels 1988 123movies 3 Evil Angels 1988 123movies 293%
Evil Angels 1988 123movies 5 Evil Angels 1988 123movies 2N/A
Evil Angels 1988 123movies 7 Evil Angels 1988 123movies 26.7 Votes: 132 Popularity: 7.041

Reviews:

The necessary enemy
Common sense tells us that “seeing is believing.” Experience tells us that, when motivation is strong enough, it’s the other way around — “believing is seeing.” Under pressure from the press and from public opinion, criminalists see blood where there is no blood. Forensic pathologists who have never see a dingo claim an absence of dingo teeth marks. Investigators see an arterial blood spray where there is nothing but a sound-deadening compound.

The case took place at a time when another of those episodes of collective hysteria was sweeping the English-speaking world. Satanic worshippers lurked in the most unlikely place and preschools were filled with pedophiles. Smokers endangered our health by subjecting us to whiffs of the burning weed. We seem to need an expression for our collective hatred. There’s even evidence from gerontological studies that angry people tend to outlive more pacific individuals — an effect the authors attributed to “the necessary enemy.” Maybe now, after the resurgence of Islamic fundamentalism, we’ll have more palpable enemies than will o’ the wisps.

The Chamberlains were caught up in that wave of collective hatred. The case must have been a dramatic one — wild dog eats baby! One can imagine the headlines, the earnest discussions, the fixed conclusions based on presumptions. Lindy Chamberlain certainly did nothing to discourage the calumny heaped upon her. She wasn’t very good at playing the victim, in contrast to, say, the Menendez brothers who slaughtered their parents, then wept on the stand while describing how abused they were, and wound up with a mistrial. And not nearly as good as Susan Smith, the woman in the unlikely town of Union, South Carolina, who drowned her two children and sobbed openly on TV while begging the mythical black kidnapper not to harm them.

Well, after all, occupying the role of victim is an acquired skill and some have acquired less of it than others. (Mersault, in Camus’ “The Stranger.”) Lindy Chamberlain, as expertly played here my Meryl Streep, a phenomenally talented technical actress, is not a likable person. She matter-of-factly whines on, complaining about things in a sing-song voice, punctuated by occasional outbursts of anger. She needed some coaching from the Menendez’ on how to engage the jury’s sympathy. And she LOOKS wrong too. She should be small and vulnerable, instead of lumpy. And she seems to have gone out of her way to look ill-groomed. Streep, properly glamorized, is a beautiful and intelligent-looking woman. As Lindy Chamberlain her eyebrows are plucked and then painted back in as mere smudges by the makeup department. Her black hair (which should have been blonde) was probably meant to be in a style called page boy (is that right?) but comes out looking more like a Nazi helmet. Streep must have put on weight for the role. Her arms and breasts are flabby and her neck seems the size of a telephone pole, reducing her lips to a tiny pink orifice in the middle of the vast featureless plane of her face. She’s as unsympathetic as all get out and human nature being what it is, people are likely to get confused about the difference between being dislikable and being guilty of murder.

Sam Neill is far more sympathetic a character but, where Streep is arrogant, he’s sensitive, muddled, and weak. He’s completely discombobulated by the prosecution’s series of questions: “Did she say she saw anything in the dingo’s mouth? Did she say she didn’t see anything in the dingo’s mouth? Did she tell you she saw NOTHING in the dingo’s mouth?” Confused, he answers that, yes, she told him she saw the dingo come out with the baby in her mouth.

Reminds me of an interrogation from “Catch-22”, something like this. Superior officer to subordinate: “When did you say we were a bunch of fools?” Subordinate: “I never said you were fools.” Superior: “Now you’re telling me when you DIDN’T say it. I’m asking you when you DID say we were a bunch of fools.” Subordinate: “I ALWAYS never say you were a bunch of fools.”

It’s a fast-paced movie. If there were any dissolves I missed them. The story comes to us in pointed scenes of the Chamberlains together, intercut with snippets of public reaction to the spectacle. But the movie, for all the tragedy inherent in the story, isn’t gripping. It not only has no hero or heroine, there’s no one who’s particularly likable. Neill suffers in silence and Streep has almost done too good a job alienating us from her character and her anguish. But overall, whatever it lacks in emotional impact it more than makes up for in its instructive quality. And of course our sympathies are with the real-life Chamberlains who were put through an immeasurable ordeal. The press and the gossipy, half-hysterical public may be easy targets, but they’re very real threats to our collective common sense.

Review By: rmax304823 Rating: Date: 2004-03-02
True Story.
Sam Neil and Meryl Streep play Michael and Lindy Chamberlain, a married couple who take a camping trip in outback Australia with their baby daughter Azaria, who one night goes missing, and only her bloody and torn clothing is recovered. Lindy is convinced that a native Dingo(a sort of wild dog) grabbed and killed Azaria, but the police and public don’t believe her, since they never heard of such behavior by a dingo, and so the Chamberlains find themselves arrested and charged with their daughter’s murder. They would be tried and later convicted, though that would be later overturned, and they would eventually be exonerated.

Fine performances by the leads, and good direction by Fred Shepisi make this a memorable and interesting tragic tale of a rush to judgment by both the press and public, a situation still relevant today.

Review By: AaronCapenBanner Rating: 7 Date: 2013-09-22

Other Information:

Original Title Evil Angels
Release Date 1988-11-03
Release Year 1988

Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr (120 min), 2 hr 2 min (122 min) (DVD)
Budget 15000000
Revenue 6908797
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Biography, Drama
Director Fred Schepisi
Writer John Bryson (based on “Evil Angels” by), Robert Caswell (screenplay), Fred Schepisi (screenplay)
Actors Meryl Streep, Sam Neill, Dale Reeves, David Hoflin
Country Australia
Awards Nominated for 1 Oscar. Another 8 wins & 11 nominations.
Production Company Warner Brothers/Seven Arts
Website N/A


Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby Stereo
Aspect Ratio 2.39 : 1
Camera Panavision Lenses
Laboratory Colorfilm Pty. Ltd., Sydney, Australia, Cinevex Film Laboratory, Melbourne, Australia
Film Length N/A
Negative Format 35 mm
Cinematographic Process Panavision (anamorphic)
Printed Film Format 35 mm

Evil Angels 1988 123movies
Original title Evil Angels
TMDb Rating 6.7 132 votes

Similar titles

Enduring Love 2004 123movies
God’s Not Dead 2 2016 123movies
A Bronx Tale 1993 123movies
Fried Green Tomatoes 1991 123movies
The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas 2008 123movies
High Art 1998 123movies
Twilight 2008 123movies
An Officer and a Spy 2019 123movies
A Star Is Born 2018 123movies
The Lion King 1994 123movies
Whatever It Takes 2000 123movies
A Better Life 2011 123movies
Openloading.com: 123Movies