Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them 2016 123movies

Watch: Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them 2016 123movies, Full Movie Online – In mid-1920s New York, Newt Scamander, a British young activist wizard, arrives in the city, holding a mysterious leather suitcase that shelters diverse and magical creatures that exist among us. Amid an already fragile equilibrium of secrecy, and the increasing disasters ascribed to the dark wizard, Gellert Grindelwald, Newt’s precious suitcase goes missing, and to make matters worse, several creatures manage to escape. Before long, this unforeseen complication catches Senior Auror Percival Graves’ attention who targets Newt, against the backdrop of an invisible, devastating, and utterly unpredictable menace that still wreaks havoc on 5th Avenue. In the end, is there a hidden agenda behind Graves’ intentions? Moreover, what will happen to the remaining fantastic beasts that are still on the loose?.
Plot: In 1926, Newt Scamander arrives at the Magical Congress of the United States of America with a magically expanded briefcase, which houses a number of dangerous creatures and their habitats. When the creatures escape from the briefcase, it sends the American wizarding authorities after Newt, and threatens to strain even further the state of magical and non-magical relations.
Smart Tags: #magic #wizard #suitcase #based_on_novel #new_york_city #magical_creature #urban_fantasy #year_1926 #sorcery #orphanage #portal #spin_off #cryptozoology #cryptozoologist #arizona_desert #snow_adventure #spell #protest #baker #false_identity #period_film

Find Alternative – Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them 2016, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	7.2/10 Votes: 475,791
	74% | RottenTomatoes
	66/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 17198 Popularity: 70.402 | TMDB

Reviews:

**Well, everything’s in the title itself, you watch it only to confirm.**

I don’t want to be so negative like the film critics, but this is a big disappointment for me watching being a film fanatic. I don’t think anyone who loved ‘Harry Potter’ film series would thumb this new beginning. This is not like ‘The Lord of the Rings’ and ‘The Hobbit’ from the same universe, but different trilogies. I was excited for something like that, as a concept wise, for the fresh tale from from the fresh characters in the same universe. I don’t know about the book version, but the film did not click for me.

It had a bunch of nice characters, and to set in the Harry Potter universe, really it should have been a masterpiece. The major drawback was the story. There’s nothing to appreciate the screenplay. It’s about some creatures from the magical world got out in the human world, just like ‘Jumanji’. So our hero struggles to recapture them. Meanwhile, some others too involved in and the reason will be revealed in the final stage.

Nice casting and great visuals. I won’t point out its director’s fault, because he has done his duty very well. He’s also will be the man behind the rest of the sequels. I think it deserved the Oscars for the costume design. Not a bad film, particularly for the kids. Comparing it with the Harry Potter franchise makes it a worst film, but independently it is an okay film. So the initiation was average, but I’m still expecting the follow ups to be much better.

_5/10_

Personally I found this movie to be 2+ hours of excellent entertainment. This is one of these movies where I simply cannot understand how people can give one and two star ratings stating that it is garbage etc. I do not get what these people expected? Maybe they just have to complain? The original Harry Potter books are very much books for children or young adults and so is this movie. It is a highly entertaining story in a magical universe with some adventure, some suspense and a lot of humor.

The magic and the magical animals are quite cool. The pocket universe (or whatever they are called in the Harry Potter world) is simply gorgeous and cool. The story is not really much to write home about but it does not have to be. This is a magical movie where the magical atmosphere is what makes the movie. It is a good enough story involving a bit of suspense, action, friendship, bad guys, quite some humor and, of course, a lot of magic. More importantly perhaps, the story is not overly stupid nor does is try to peddle crappy SJW nonsense messages about gender or diversity nor climate. This movie delivers where it counts as far as I am concerned. It is entertaining, plain and simple.

If I should endeavor try to find something to complain about it would probably be that the lead character was fairly bland. He did not really have much charisma. That and the fact that I never really understood which, despicable (presumably) acts the main opponent, Grindelwald, had actually committed before the events of the movie.

On the whole I enjoyed the movie a lot and although it is perhaps not the absolutely best movie I have ever seen but it still deserves a top rating.

Magical, but very different, successor to the Harry Potter sphere
I wasn’t sure what to expect from Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. It smelt curiously of “cash grab” since the Harry Potter films managed to conclude themselves quite perfectly, all the more so considering Warner Brothers preemptively announced four sequels before this film had reached theatres. The best compliment I can give it is that it proved me wrong- Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them never feels lazy, or cheap – it’s a worthy adventure that will have all but the most cynical revelling in the wonder of the Wizarding World.

The film is fast paced and constantly dishing out new surprises, in the form of beautifully rendered, inventive CGI “beasts,” and a number of hilarious, imaginative features of this magical world of New York that successfully create the illusion of being in a different world. There are tons of minute little details that delight in the purest sense. The set of new faces are mostly agreeable, the most likable being Dan Fogler, whose bumbling “non – magi” is a welcome addition. He elevates sometimes silly jokes with expert comedic timing and facial expressions. Katherine Waterston is fine enough, as is her flirtatious sister. And what of star Eddie Redmayne? He is alternately charming and annoying. The character of Newt Scamander is one fully realised by Rowling’s script, yet Redmayne’s Hugh Grant- esque, crouched delivery is at times grating. Nonetheless he wins you over in the end. I won’t say who the villains are, because that plays into the intrigue of the plot, but suffice to say villainous characters were decidedly underused for my taste, and could’ve used far more development than the already packed script granted them.

In all, this film never quite touches the awe and great characters imbued within each Harry Potter film and book, but it offers many delights nonetheless, and is definitely worth seeing, especially on a big screen, where it looks positively beautiful.

Harry Potter’s Universe Without Potter is Just as Good
The magical community in Britain has been fleshed out rather well through the seven Harry Potter books and the eight films that followed, but America’s magic users have been pretty much overlooked.

Until now.

The year is 1926. In the midst of the dark wizard Grindelwald wreaking havoc in Europe, an unassuming man travels to New York City with a case full of, well, fantastic beasts ( a case which goes full TARDIS, as well).

There’s also an unknown magical threat tearing up streets and striking fear in the hearts of the nomaj (non-magical, US term for muggle) community. The Magical Congress of the United States is searching for the culprit, and who do they blame? The unassuming man, Newt Scamander, a role that Eddie Redmayne fits into perfectly.

With the help of Tina Goldstein, a disgraced Auror, and Jacob Kowalski, a nomaj who gets caught up in Scamander’s creature exploits, they must clear Scamander’s name and find out who is behind the attacks in New York and stop them.

This film has a lot going for it, but it really holds up as an installment of the Harry Potter franchise in the way that it showcases the allure of the universe without the old story of The Boy Who Lived. It is also buoyed by great visual effects and witty banter throughout.

This will prove to be just the first of possibly many films in the Harry Potter universe (and yes, Johnny Depp does show up as Grindelwald), and if this film is any indicator of the wonder this universe instills, I can’t wait for more.

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 12 min (132 min)
Budget 180000000
Revenue 809342332
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Adventure, Family, Fantasy
Director David Yates
Writer J.K. Rowling
Actors Eddie Redmayne, Katherine Waterston, Alison Sudol
Country United Kingdom, United States
Awards Won 1 Oscar. 15 wins & 54 nominations total
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix DTS (DTS: X), Dolby Digital, Dolby Atmos, Dolby Surround 7.1, 12-Track Digital Sound, IMAX 6-Track, Auro 11.1, Sonics-DDP
Aspect Ratio 1.90 : 1 (IMAX 3-D version: frame break), 2.39 : 1
Camera Arri Alexa XT Studio, Panavision E- and G-Series Lenses, Arri Alexa XT, Panavision C-, E-, G-Series and AWZ2 Lenses
Laboratory N/A
Film Length N/A
Negative Format Codex ARRIRAW (2.8K)
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (4K) (master format), Dolby Vision, Panavision (anamorphic) (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision 2383), 70 mm (blow-up) (Kodak Vision 2383), D-Cinema (also 3-D version)