Video Sources 0 Views

  • Watch traileryoutube.com
  • Source 1123movies
  • Source 2123movies
  • Source 3123movies
House of Fools 2002 123movies

House of Fools 2002 123movies

It's a mad, mad, mad world...Dec. 06, 2002104 Min.
Your rating: 0
5 1 vote

Synopsis

Watch: Дом дураков 2002 123movies, Full Movie Online – In the midst of the Chechen War, a remote psychiatric institution is left without staff leaving the patients to fend for themselves. Based on a true story..
Plot: The war film that’s not a war film. A film about the mental institution which backdrop is the Chechen war. A story about the patients living in an institution during the war on the border of Chechnia and Russia during the war. The patients have to continue living their day to day life after being invaded twice over, and they have to deal with their sicknesses.
Smart Tags: #falling_down_stairs_in_a_wheelchair #patient #chechen #soldier #russia #love #hospital #first_chechen_war #playing_with_a_match #fake_soldier #circus_school #penis #victory #attack #laundry #war_casualty #shock #bandit #haircut #photograph #chauvinism


Find Alternative – Дом дураков 2002, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day


Ratings:

N/A Votes: 2,829
41% | RottenTomatoes
52/100 | MetaCritic
N/A Votes: 33 Popularity: 3.505 | TMDB

Reviews:

Masterpiece!
I saw this film yesterday and I’m still under the impression. It was overwhelming. All is brilliant — plot, acting, images, music…

Certainly, there are motifs from other films — “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest” (for example, the episode when the inmate break out of the asylum), “Dancer in the Dark” (the dreams of Janna) — but they are organically interwoven in the canvass of Konchalovsky’s film.

This oeuvre, like other films by Andrei Konchalovsky, is a result of a happy amalgamation, a synthesis of Western and Russian cinema traditions, which does not happen often.

The film is profoundly artistic and at the same time realistic. This is achieved not least by a careful choice of details. For example, in the background, in the TV screen, you see Boris Yeltsin, the Russian ex-President who started this dirty war, and his corrupt Minister of Defence Pavel Grachov (“Pasha Mercedes”).

The verbal language is also true to life. The personages, in particular the Russian military, use quite a few of Russian ‘four-letter words’, and here the use of such words is fully justified.

I saw the films in a DVD edition (Paramount Classics, 2003) and the only disappointment was the subtitles. The English translation is sometimes too inexact and leaves too much dialogue untranslated. This needs to be corrected in the subsequent edition.

Of course, the best is to see the film in Russian. But even if you do not speak Russian, try to see this film, because it is a masterpiece of a universal value, which transcends the language barriers. Watch it with an open mind.

I wish that all Russians had the chance too see ‘The House of Fools’. Then, probably, their perception of the Chechen people would change for the better, and it would also bring them to a reflection about the war in the Caucasus, which is both Russia’s crime and illness, and how the country could overcome it.

Thank you Mr. Konchalovsky, thank you all who made this excellent film! 10/10

Review By: ybelov
NOT the Russian One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest.
One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest is a great movie that was based on an even greater book, but I wish people wouldn’t compare this movie to that one so often. Yes, the similarities are extensive and impossible to miss, but House of Fools, as the title translates into English, is a different film that has it’s own weight and it’s own meanings. This is not, by any means whatsoever, another vision of Ken Kesey’s classic, nor is it a remake in any way of that of Milos Forman.

(spoilers) Yuliya Vysotskaya, who played Janna, the main character, delivers a wonderful performance of this woman who lives in a mental hospital right on the Russian border during the Chechen War (a war about which I admittedly know absolutely nothing). Her ailment is never made clear (nor are any of the others), except for a scene in the middle of the movie where she reveals, through dialogue, some of what are probably many more illusions (I won’t count her illusory belief that she can dance). As she is being abandoned by Ahmed, who she thinks is the love of her life, she tells him that she loves him, and asks him to please don’t kill her. Then she tells the mud that she loves it, and please don’t kill her, etc.

Her mental condition is not important, although her character, while skillfully performed, is so laden with a cloying freight of symbolism that it often becomes difficult to see her as a person rather than a heavily symbolic character in a heavily symbolic movie. There is a common misconception (supported by the movie’s very own tagline) that the doctors at the mental hospital around which the story revolved abandoned the patients, leaving them to fend for themselves during the Chechen War during which the movie takes place. I don’t really understand this assertion, since the doctor returns at the end of the film, explains what happened to him when he went to find a bus to transfer the patients to a better hospital. Just the fact that he returned should have been enough to show that he didn’t simply ditch them all.

I wish I had a better memory for the names of the characters in the movie, because one of the other patients, the one with the wraparound glasses and the backpack full of his poetry, played a significant role in the movie. He and Janna are clearly the mother and father figures for the rest of the patients when they are left to their own devices, seeing over the rest of the cast and, periodically, offering the chance for audience members to question the validity of their respective mental instabilities. I don’t know much about mental disorders, but there were certainly scenes in this movie where it seemed to me that they were being treated for more mental instability than they regularly displayed. These were balanced out, however, by scenes where they each displayed rather crippling disabilities, his the complete inability to communicate or assess situations effectively, and hers some dangerous attachment issues and the displacement of emotions onto things like inanimate objects.

As far as the war goes, I won’t go into detail about the meaning of the war itself in the film because, like I mentioned above, I know nothing about the war that is going on offscreen, but the movie makes some interesting points about the chaos and destructiveness of war. One of them is the almost-cliché of the man who saves another man’s life, only to find himself fighting on the opposite side from him later on. Sort of a cliché by now, yes, but it adds to the movie’s later concentration on the chaos and confusion surrounding war in general. There are several scenes in which the mental patients are understandably terrified and utterly lost as to what is going on around them. This is to be expected, but there are also several scenes in which the soldiers and even their commanders are pretty confused as to what is happening. One tense scene has two opposing factions facing each other (notably making an illicit drug deal), when one of the soldiers carelessly stumbles on his gun, making it fire off a few rounds into the air, which leads to the two groups firing machine guns at each other for several seconds before anyone realizes that it was all just a stupid mistake. The soldier who accidentally caused it laughs it off.

The references to One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest are everywhere. The patients are left to their own devices (in this case because the doctor left longer than intended because he was delayed by the war, in the other case because McMurphy persuaded them all to escape for a while), which has a healing effect on all of them but not enough to make any of them want to leave the hospital, their home, at the end of the film. There’s an interesting element of the movie involving Bryan Adams, who literally colors Janna’s life with his music, even though she has a completely delusional relationship with him, which would seem to have a detrimental effect on her mental health. What I see by his occasional entrances into the movie are not some weak effort to provide recognizance by inserting an American pop star, but a layered effect of meaning that reflects the many other layers of meaning in the film. Bryan Adams, while he is not meant to have had a real relationship with this woman who thinks that she is engaged to him, lights up her life with his music (notice how the color fills the screen when it’s playing), while she attempts to do the same for the rest of the patients with her own accordion playing. She doesn’t always succeed with all of them, but she certainly does much more than she does with the soldiers, who she also plays for on more than one occasion, and is laughed at each time (which may very well signify some kind of juvenile cynicism among the lower ranks of military forces).

I don’t pretend to understand every level of symbolism that is portrayed in this movie, but it’s important to notice that they’re there. It’s amazing how much more meaning and importance some little movie from Russia like this has than the typical multi-million dollar blockbuster released here in America, and I really wish that people would pay at least a tiny bit more attention to the few movies released (dare I say the majority of which come from other countries?) that actually mean something. There are a lot of things in this movie that are difficult to comprehend, indeed, many which seem to be in the movie as examples of pure artistic expression, but the movie as a whole, like it’s main character, is so laden with meaning and symbolism that it is virtually impossible to see it all on just one viewing. The movie deserves at LEAST that much.

Review By: Anonymous_Maxine

Other Information:

Original Title Дом дураков
Release Date 2002-12-06
Release Year 2002

Original Language ru
Runtime 1 hr 44 min (104 min)
Budget 2500000
Revenue 157613
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Drama, Music, Romance
Director Andrey Konchalovskiy
Writer Andrey Konchalovskiy
Actors Yuliya Vysotskaya, Sultan Islamov, Bryan Adams
Country N/A
Awards 4 wins & 6 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A


Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby Digital
Aspect Ratio 1.85 : 1
Camera N/A
Laboratory N/A
Film Length N/A
Negative Format 35 mm
Cinematographic Process Spherical
Printed Film Format 35 mm

House of Fools 2002 123movies
Original title Дом дураков
TMDb Rating 5.97 33 votes

Similar titles

Locked Down 2010 123movies
Like the Wind 2013 123movies
Love, Kennedy 2017 123movies
Never Talk to Strangers 1995 123movies
Loving Vincent 2017 123movies
My Egg Boy 2016 123movies
Deadly Mom Retreat 2021 123movies
Eyes Wide Shut 1999 123movies
Pitcher and the Pin-Up 2003 123movies
The Middle Man 2021 123movies
My Grandfather’s People 2011 123movies
1982 2013 123movies
Openloading.com: 123movies