Video Sources 0 Views

  • Watch traileryoutube.com
  • Source 1123movies
  • Source 2123movies
  • Source 3123movies
Mary Poppins Returns 2018 123movies

Mary Poppins Returns 2018 123movies

Magic Always Returns.Dec. 13, 2018131 Min.
Your rating: 0
5 1 vote

Synopsis

Watch: Mary Poppins Returns 2018 123movies, Full Movie Online – In Depression-era London, a now-grown Jane (Emily Mortimer) and Michael Banks (Ben Whishaw), along with Michael’s three children, are visited by the enigmatic Mary Poppins (Emily Blunt) following a personal loss. Through her unique magical skills, and with the aid of her friend Jack (Lin-Manuel Miranda), she helps the family rediscover the joy and wonder missing in their lives..
Plot: Mary Poppins returns to the Banks family and helps them evade grave dangers by taking them on magical, musical adventures.
Smart Tags: #nanny #animated_sequence #magic #second_part #dolphin #umbrella #underwater_scene #drawing #family_relationships #brother_sister_relationship #song_and_dance #live_action_and_animation #1930s #london_england #cartoon_badger #live_action_animated_hybrid #older_version_of_character #big_ben_london #imagination #autonomous_reflection #father_child_relationship


Find Alternative – Mary Poppins Returns 2018, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day


Ratings:

6.7/10 Votes: 88,803
80% | RottenTomatoes
66/100 | MetaCritic
N/A Votes: 2931 Popularity: 21.404 | TMDB

Reviews:


I enjoyed this movie just as I love the original Mary Poppins. I think it is largely a thankless task doing sequels for beloved films: Christopher Robin and Hook had to pass through a crucible of dislike by lovers of similar original flicks. Remakes are similarly unpopular, perhaps for better reason, in my opinion. O

The makers of Mary Poppins Returns aren’t trying to reinvent the wheel, just entertain by using a bit of imagination to bring the original tale to a more savvy modern audience. No reason for us to rhetorically throw our toys out of the sandbox. Okay, I may not watch this new offering as often as I have the original, but it was entertaining without being rude, profane, crude or violent. Kind of rare, that.

Review By: Peter McGinn

The original Mary Poppins was one of my favorite movies when I was a kid and it kind of still is. Thus I was indeed a bit worried when I sat down to watch this one with the kids yesterday. After all there is really so many ways a incompetent writer could have screwed this one up. Especially one with an agenda.

Luckily this was not the case and I have to say that I quite liked this movie. Disney actually managed to keep the ambiance of the original movie and it actually felt like a Disney movie from the good old days. The days before every easily offended retard tried to make every movie into a preaching mouth piece for their personal crusade.

I think I liked the first half of the movie best. It was an explosion of song, magic and, for me, nostalgia. Apart from the hugely improved technology this movie had available to make the magic bits it actually felt like it could have been made back to back with the original. They really managed to capture the atmosphere from back then.

If I had to compare the two directly I would still go with the original as the best one. It was more imaginative and it just felt a bit better two me.

The story is a bit of a rehash of the original. They could have come up with something more original. Also, the second movie seemed to fizzle out a bit compared to the first half. I would have liked to see some more Mary Poppins coolness and magic, like we saw in the first half of the movie, instead of, mostly, conventional stuff. Also the take down of the bad guy was a bit underwhelming.

Apart from that I think sequel was not bad at all.

Review By: Per Gunnar Jonsson
Mostly Magical in Every Way!
Growing up Mary Poppins was one of my favorite films. When Saving Mr. Banks came out a few years back I re-watched the original for first time in years and found a depth I didn’t pick up on as a child. So I wasn’t really looking forward to a follow up given that the first movie was practically perfect in every way. More to the point who but Andrews could ever do the character justice? Nonetheless, I ventured to see this today because Rob Marshall (he directed the great Chicago) was the director so I had a little bit of hope this would be OK. It is not only OK but it is a wonderful fellow-up to the original film and in some ways closer to the books. My only complaint, and it is exceedingly minor given that it is a family film, is the overall template of Mary Poppins is rather obvious. The new adventure is a bit like the old one and there’s a lot of analog scenes between the two films. But given that Mary Poppins returns to help the Banks children again it feels correct that this is the case. The film is surprising in its details, but comforting in its large familiar strokes.

I think, and I can’t believe this is true, Blunt is the main reason for this. Andrews is the gold standard but Blunt is almost her equal. Her Poppins is funny, stern, warm, knows more than she let’s on, has everything in hand and is utterly charming. Blunt is everything you would want from the character and more. I was most surprised by her vocal performance being as good as it is. Jack (Bert’s stand in and family relation) is also a great character. Miranda gives an crackerjack performance of charm, wit and wisdom. Best (and weirdest) of all Miranda uses a bad cockney accent all the time (and while singing!) that *somehow* manages to be obviously bad yet believable and adorable. Everyone is so good in this and the thing I thought most likely to sink the picture is the best part.

Not to overlook the score because it is so good I just brought it. It is not quite as memorable as the original but it is solidly singable and ear wormy. So while, say, “Can You Imagine That?” is not quite as perfect as “A Spoonful of Sugar” it is a brilliant song in its own right. The real standout is “A Cover is not a Book” as it is clever, funny, and carries a lot of weight in the story. I think I will playing this on a loop for a while.

The film is quite technically polished. I would argue that the integration of the live-action and animation is done better here than in the original. The cinematographer, art director, and custom designer did a better job of making the various wolds far more seamless here than in the 1st film. The music hall scene is fun and exciting as well as being a marvel.

I thought this film was going to be a disaster. Turns out it is among the best of the year.

Review By: CubsandCulture
I’m So Sorry!
I wanted to like/love this so much! My Family came in town the day before Christmas to watch this with me. I am sorry to say, it put us all to sleep! We were all struggling to stay awake. I didn’t know that until we were outside the theater. I thought is was only me! That’s really upsetting! I struggled to keep my eyes open wondering why my Nephew and Sister were leaning forward. Later I learned why- to stay awake! I did manage towards the end to see it through. I remember a lot of dark scenes- maybe that’s why? Was it the movie itself? I’m 62. My Sister 63. We grew up with Mary Poppins. It’s true as others have said, the music I can’t remember- but in the theater it seemed the same music for the whole movie. Was I impressed by the production? Yes! I was awake for the ending, and the beginning… and I love Emily Blunt! Manuel Miranda was okay- but I’m not sure his screen presence worked and I can’t tell you why? I thought the acting was good. Was it the story? Was there really a story? As far as I know the kids really didn’t need Mary and maybe not the parents too for I know not what she did to help them! It’s only at the very end the kite reveals it’s secrets but what happened in between? Maybe I was asleep 🙁 I wanted to see this movie! I love and can sit through the original without falling asleep. P.S. Dick Van Dykie was wonderful! Maybe it was a good thing Julie didn’t join in I’m sorry to say.
Review By: xetaprime-64257

Other Information:

Original Title Mary Poppins Returns
Release Date 2018-12-13
Release Year 2018

Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 10 min (130 min)
Budget 130000000
Revenue 348807090
Status Released
Rated PG
Genre Adventure, Comedy, Family
Director Rob Marshall
Writer P.L. Travers, David Magee, Rob Marshall
Actors Emily Blunt, Lin-Manuel Miranda, Ben Whishaw
Country United States
Awards Nominated for 4 Oscars. 23 wins & 111 nominations total
Production Company N/A
Website N/A


Technical Information:

Sound Mix Dolby Atmos, Dolby Surround 7.1
Aspect Ratio 2.39 : 1
Camera Arri Alexa Mini, Panavision Primo V and G-Series Lenses, Arri Alexa SXT, Panavision Primo V, G-Series, ATZ, AWZ2 and Angenieux Optimo Lenses
Laboratory Sixteen19, London, UK (digital dailies), Sixteen19, New York (NY), USA (digital dailies), Technicolor PostWorks, New York (NY), USA (digital intermediate)
Film Length N/A
Negative Format Codex
Cinematographic Process ARRIRAW (3.4K) (source format), Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format), Panavision (anamorphic) (source format)
Printed Film Format D-Cinema

Mary Poppins Returns 2018 123movies
Mary Poppins Returns 2018 123movies
Mary Poppins Returns 2018 123movies
Mary Poppins Returns 2018 123movies
Mary Poppins Returns 2018 123movies
Mary Poppins Returns 2018 123movies
Mary Poppins Returns 2018 123movies
Mary Poppins Returns 2018 123movies
Mary Poppins Returns 2018 123movies
Mary Poppins Returns 2018 123movies
Original title Mary Poppins Returns
TMDb Rating 6.523 2,931 votes

Similar titles

Trolls Band Together
Twin Town 1997 123movies
Welcome to Dongmakgol 2005 123movies
Barbecue 2014 123movies
Rabbit School: Guardians of the Golden Egg 2017 123movies
Martin & Margot 2019 123movies
My Boyfriend’s Back 1993 123movies
Blurred 2002 123movies
Sione’s 2: Unfinished Business 2012 123movies
Zenon: Girl of the 21st Century 1999 123movies
The House of Magic 2013 123movies
An American Girl: Chrissa Stands Strong 2009 123movies
Openloading.com: 123movies