Nutty Professor II: The Klumps 2000 123movies

Watch: Nutty Professor II: The Klumps 2000 123movies, Full Movie Online – Having learned his lesson after the events of The Nutty Professor (1996), meek, gentle Dr Sherman Klump dedicates himself to science. However, when Denise Gaines, a beautiful fellow DNA researcher, enters the picture, once more, Dr Klump is in love. And, as the love-smitten professor dreams of a brighter future, the lean-and-mean Buddy Love persona emerges, demanding freedom. Now, the nasty alter-ego stands in the way of happiness, and poor Sherman must do everything in his power to rid himself of Buddy once and for all. Can the rowdy Klump family lend a helping hand?.
Plot: The hilarity begins when professor Sherman Klump finds romance with fellow DNA specialist, Denise Gaines, and discovers a brilliant formula that reverses aging. But Sherman’s thin and obnoxious alter ego, Buddy Love, wants out…and a big piece of the action. And when Buddy gets loose, things get seriously nutty.
Smart Tags: #miller_beer #urination #hamster #bestiality #mutation #slapstick_comedy #2000s #psychotronic_film #gross_out_comedy #bmw #cadillac_automobile #chevrolet #dodge_the_car #ford_mustang #gmc #honda #honda_civic #lincoln_motor_company #lincoln_town_car #mercury_the_car #mercedes_benz

Find Alternative – Nutty Professor II: The Klumps 2000, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	4.4/10 Votes: 51,361
	27% | RottenTomatoes
	38/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 1107 Popularity: 15.49 | TMDB

Reviews:

Stretches the Limits of PG-13 Rating!
This picture is a crass and obnoxious misfire from Murphy, primarily due to it’s unbelievably undeserved PG-13 rating. Laced with profanity, sexual innuendo and bathroom humor, you have to wonder if anyone from the ratings board was awake when this film was screened. If they think this type of fare is appropriate for young teenagers, they must live on another planet. Of course, if it had been rated “R”, perhaps my opinion would be different: Murphy is often at his funniest when he’s profane & irreverant, but that’s for my adult sensibilities, not for those of pre-pubescent or (just barely) post-pubescent sensibilities. Murphy should know better (and has shown better judgement with the “Dr. DoLittle” pics) than to pander this kind of junk to kids.

All that notwithstanding, Murphy again essays multiple roles (under tons of Makeup) as nearly every member of the Klump family. Murphy has already worn more makeup than Boris Karloff ever did in his whole lifetime, so he must enjoy it. Tech credits are good as Murphy appears with Murphy, Murphy and Murphy in umpteen scenes, proving that split screen has been adequately exceeded with digital replacement.

Half-witted plot has professor Klump developing a youth serum, while dealing with the personal inner demons of his “Buddy Love” personna (see first movie for more details). Klump, constantly embarrased by subliminal impulses from his “Buddy” personna, isolates & extracts the Buddy Love DNA, which later spills onto the laboratory pet dog, resulting in an incomprehensible reincarnation of Buddy in human form (but with latent doggy traits). Buddy is intent on stealing the youth formula. and a race ensues to see who can complete the deal, with several dilemmas thrown in along the way. Looks like the sreenwriters swiped a few ideas from early Star Trek episodes (see “The Enemy Within”).

Never mind what happens next. Change the channel. And definitely avoid the “Uncensored Director’s Cut”; it just makes a bad movie worse.

Doesn’t Measure Up
This cannot measure up to the first film – the first with Eddie Murphy, that is, not the Jerry Lewis film from 1963. (Actually, this doesn’t measure up to the Lewis film, either.)

For me, the biggest disappointment was the “family” scenes in which Murphy plays almost all the roles including old ladies. In the first film, some of that was absolutely hilarious, the highlight of the movie. Here, that isn’t the case. Also, some of the dialog is almost impossible to decipher. It’s also too raunchy and this film should have been rated “R.” A PG-13 rating is ridiculous with all the emphasis on sex. I hate to see kids watch movies like this.

Still, this had a decent share of funny moments. Also, to its credit, it is not as mean-spirited as the first film turned out to be. Still, the bad outweighs the good. It needed to be funnier, and less raunchy.

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 46 min (106 min), 1 hr 49 min (109 min) (unrated director’s cut) (USA)
Budget 84000000
Revenue 123307945
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Comedy, Romance, Sci-Fi
Director Peter Segal
Writer Jerry Lewis, Steve Oedekerk, Barry W. Blaustein
Actors Eddie Murphy, Janet Jackson, Larry Miller
Country United States
Awards 2 wins & 15 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix DTS, Dolby Digital, SDDS
Aspect Ratio 1.85 : 1, 2.39 : 1 (anamorphic shots)
Camera Panavision Panaflex Platinum, Panavision Primo, C- and E-Series Lenses
Laboratory DeLuxe, Hollywood (CA), USA (color)
Film Length 2,962 m (Spain)
Negative Format 35 mm
Cinematographic Process Panavision (anamorphic) (partly), Spherical
Printed Film Format 35 mm (Fuji F-CP 3519D)