Video Sources 8 Views

  • Watch
  • Source 1123movies
  • Source 2123movies
  • Source 3123movies
  • Source 4123movies
Revolver 2005 123movies

Revolver 2005 123movies

Your mind will not accept a game this bigSep. 11, 2005111 Min.
Your rating: 0
6 1 vote


#123movies #fmovies #putlocker #gomovies #solarmovie #soap2day Watch Full Movie Online Free – After seven years in solitary, Jake Green is released from prison. In the next two years, he amasses a lot of money by gambling. He’s ready to seek his revenge on Dorothy (Mr. D) Macha, a violence-prone casino owner who sent Jake to prison. He humiliates Macha in front of Macha’s lieutenants, leaves, and keels over. Doctors tell him he has a rare disease and will die in three days; Macha also puts a hit out on him. Loan sharks, Zack and Avi, demand Jake’s cash and complete fealty in return for protection. Jake complies, and through narration and flashbacks, we watch him through at least three days of schemes, danger, and redemption. Who is his greatest enemy?
Plot: Hotshot gambler Jake Green (Jason Statham) is long on bravado and seriously short of common sense. Rarely is he allowed in any casino because he’s a bona fide winner and, in fact, has taken so much money over the years that he’s the sole client of his accountant elder brother, Billy. Invited to a private game, Jake is in fear of losing his life.
Smart Tags: #gambling #one_word_title #casino #prison #flashback #disease #cash #doctor #boss #loan_shark #breasts #shaky_cam #dutch_angle #snapping_fingers #the_color_red #twin #wreath #whispering #tanning_room #safe #running_for_your_life

Revolver 2005 Streaming Links:


Revolver 2005 123movies 1 Revolver 2005 123movies 26.4/10 Votes: 90,123
Revolver 2005 123movies 3 Revolver 2005 123movies 215%
Revolver 2005 123movies 5 Revolver 2005 123movies 225/100
Revolver 2005 123movies 7 Revolver 2005 123movies 26.3 Votes: 899 Popularity: 13.12


It isn’t style without substance – it is style with poor substance
After seven years in solitary confinement between a cell containing a chess master and a cell containing a con artist, Jake leaves to seek revenge on Macha with the vast amount of money he has gotten from gambling. He starts his revenge with humiliation but soon blacks out only to be told by a doctor that he has mere days to live. Mysterious loan sharks Zack and Avi offer him “protection” from death in return for all his money. Meanwhile Macha puts a hit out on Jake. With death and betrayal everywhere, somebody is playing the ultimate high-stakes game – but are all the players known, and who will emerge victorious?

I had someone ask me recently if I’d seen this because they wanted a second opinion. The reason for this, they said, was that they thought it was good one minute, then terrible the next, then maybe it is good again, then not, then it ended. Of course being asked for an opinion peaked my interest (and boosted my ego) and I was planning to watch it anyway, just to see for myself what about it deserved such a slating from the critics. In answer to the latter statement it must be said that, unsurprisingly, the film did not deserve the universal condemnation it received in the press and in truth it was just another time to lay into someone who had gotten too big for his boots and perhaps needed taking down a peg or two – and a weak project was the perfect reason. It happens every year – critics have so many mediocre films to write about that a good one sees loving reviews in the same way as a bad one is the chance to write a really memorable, scathing review – whether either it is truly deserved or not.

So this leaves me with my colleague’s statement and on that I found him to be accurate because at times it does SEEM to be a really cool film that is going somewhere interesting. This impression is built around a good start and pace to the film, with plenty of tough posturing, mystery and style. In fact, to deny that the film is delivered with style would be bad form indeed because the film does look very cool and very interesting. Problem is that, at some point, that isn’t enough and once you get beyond the halfway mark you get the increasing feeling that this isn’t going anywhere nearly as interesting or clever as you would like to think. By the ending that feeling will be confirmed as correct as the film stumbles into a pretentious and poorly delivered conclusion to the story and characters. Ritchie had been quite unreasonably arrogant about people who don’t “get” his film but to me not only is it his fault for the ham-fisted delivery of his twist, but as writer he also has come up with an idea for a twist that reads like a poor copy of other, better films. It just doesn’t play and the cold (if stylish) approach keeps the audience at a distance so we care less than we should and are given more opportunity to see the twists as pretentious and half-cooked.

Within this messy and slightly nonsensical affair the cast actually do pretty well by playing to the style rather than the content. Statham makes the best of his situation with another tough presence on screen even if, ultimately, I don’t think he buys his character himself and thus cannot be part of the sale to the audience. Liotta I quite liked even though the “unhinged violent criminal” thing is pretty much the equivalent of him staring out the window with everything set to cruise control. Pastore and Benjamin are a cool presence who drive the film early on (with the mystery of their characters) but gradually become less engaging as the plot unravels. The rest of the cast pretty much provide solid enough tough men without (fortunately) sinking into the easy “apples and pears” type performances that Ritchie seems to like in his films generally. The only performance of real note though is from Ritchie as director because he pulls everything together with a lot of visual style and imagination; shame then that the worst “performance” is also from him as a writer because he has produced a script so full of its own cleverness that it cannot be bothered to aim for engaging the audience and sits back arrogantly while the delivery is fudged and incoherent.

Revolver is not the screaming disaster that everyone would have you believe, but this is as close to a recommendation as I can give it. Visually it is stylish and early on this sense of tough coolness does draw you into the plot to see where it goes. Sadly though the answer is that it doesn’t go anywhere worth being and it goes there with a slow pace that suggests it is being very clever and worthy when really the plot is not anywhere as clever or as developed as it needed to be. It isn’t style without substance – it is style with poor substance.

Review By: bob the moo Rating: Date: 2008-10-15
Ritchie Genius (Did you work out the Con?)
Mild Movie Spoiler (sorry)

Reading the reviews from the Toronto festival I thought Ritchies new ‘G’ movie was gonna be a Swept away 2, but I watched it last night AND ITS THE BEST FILM I’ve EVER SEEN ITS WILD. Reading other peoples reviews I feel like I watched a different movie. Anyone who hasn’t watched it make your own mind up go see it trust me, anyone who has already seen it watch it again or wait for DVD. it truly is a classic. I don’t know if Mr. Madonna wrote this himself as its nothing like the witty Snatch dialogue it’s POETIC (especially Jake’s voice over), the acting, which is still in Ritchies LS2SB style yet more mature (which I feel he pulls off), the look, the feel, the fancy cutting, music and i don’t even need to mention the concept, the hidden meanings, the stuff in the BG. Maybe it does have a few Kabbala references but so what!!, me and my friends talked about the film for 3 hours afterwards never have I discussed a film this much before (and no I’m not a film student) between us we worked out Sam Gold is like Kaiser Soze except he doesn’t have a limp or cripple hand and you see him a few times in the last quarter of the movie (if you watch closely!), Ritchie has turned a movie into a Game you either get conned and don’t understand it or you play along and enjoy the ride (nobody likes to get conned which would explain why people who don’t get it slate it) what i most liked is GR gives you all the set ups but its up to you as the viewer to put the puzzle together he only answers 1 question which i think he should have also left blank (Zack & Ave) people will soon start copying this concept of cinema interaction (like they copied to death his LS2SB style) as I for one am fed up with the likes of Tom Cruise saving the world. REVOLVER***** God Damn Genius

Review By: melatona91 Rating: 10 Date: 2005-09-21

Other Information:

Original Title Revolver
Release Date 2005-09-11
Release Year 2005

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 51 min (111 min)
Budget 27000000
Revenue 6700000
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller
Director Guy Ritchie
Writer Luc Besson (adaptation), Guy Ritchie
Actors Jason Statham, Ray Liotta, Vincent Pastore, André 3000
Country France, UK
Awards 1 win.
Production Company EuropaCorp
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix DTS, Dolby Digital
Aspect Ratio 2.35 : 1
Camera Arricam LT, Cooke S4 and Angenieux Optimo Lenses, Arricam ST, Cooke S4 and Angenieux Optimo Lenses
Laboratory Eclair Numérique (digital grading)
Film Length N/A
Negative Format 35 mm
Cinematographic Process Super 35
Printed Film Format 35 mm (anamorphic)

Revolver 2005 123movies
Revolver 2005 123movies
Revolver 2005 123movies
Revolver 2005 123movies
Revolver 2005 123movies
Revolver 2005 123movies
Revolver 2005 123movies
Original title Revolver
TMDb Rating 6.3 899 votes

Similar titles

Christmas with The Chosen: The Messengers 2021 123movies
Good Thief 2021 123movies
Locked In 2010 123movies
The Blue Lamp 1950 123movies
The Plan 2019 123movies
Assassins 1995 123movies
Tympanum 2012 123movies
Irupathiyonnaam Noottaandu 2019 123movies
Animas 2018 123movies
The Profession of Arms 2001 123movies
The Favorite 2019 123movies
Crazy/Beautiful 2001 123movies