Video Sources 0 Views

  • Watch
  • Source 1123movies
  • Source 2123movies
  • Source 3123movies
Star Trek 2009 123movies

Star Trek 2009 123movies

The future begins.May. 06, 2009127 Min.
Your rating: 0
6 1 vote


Watch: Star Trek 2009 123movies, Full Movie Online – On the day of James T. Kirk’s birth, his father dies on his damaged starship in a last stand against a Romulan mining vessel looking for Ambassador Spock, who in this time, has grown on Vulcan disdained by his neighbors for his half-human heritage. 25 years later, James T. Kirk has grown into a young rebellious troublemaker. Challenged by Captain Christopher Pike to realize his potential in Starfleet, he comes to annoy academy instructors like Commander Spock. Suddenly, there is an emergency on Vulcan and the newly-commissioned USS Enterprise is crewed with promising cadets like Nyota Uhura, Hikaru Sulu, Pavel Chekov and even Kirk himself, thanks to Leonard McCoy’s medical trickery. Together, this crew will have an adventure in the final frontier where the old legend is altered forever as a new version of the legend begins..
Plot: The fate of the galaxy rests in the hands of bitter rivals. One, James Kirk, is a delinquent, thrill-seeking Iowa farm boy. The other, Spock, a Vulcan, was raised in a logic-based society that rejects all emotion. As fiery instinct clashes with calm reason, their unlikely but powerful partnership is the only thing capable of leading their crew through unimaginable danger, boldly going where no one has gone before. The human adventure has begun again.
Smart Tags: #vulcan #future #based_on_tv_series #father_son_relationship #corvette_convertible #space_battle #lifted_by_the_throat #sex_with_alien #loss_of_father #star_trek #reboot_of_series #death_of_father #half_human #starfleet #anger #alien_planet #disobeying_orders #snow_adventure #the_future #captain #car

Find Alternative – Star Trek 2009, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day


7.9/10 Votes: 604,028
94% | RottenTomatoes
82/100 | MetaCritic
N/A Votes: 8906 Popularity: 48.273 | TMDB


**The following is a long form review that I originally wrote in 2013**

I did like _Star Trek_. I did not, however, appear to like it as much as the rest of the whole damn planet.

I appreciate the decent helping of Australian actors in the mix (like personal favourite Chris Hemsworth, above). I can get behind the colourful and impressive special effects spectacle. Most of all I dig the reboot angle they pulled. The whole time travel/tangent universe thing is the perfect breeding of remaining true to the original, while still not constricting themselves to the old canon. Fantastic idea.

But I didn’t love it. I’m a big fan of origin stories, but I personally feel that _Star Trek_ never really breached past that point. The first half was brilliant, getting to know the characters, the world, the ideals, everything. But in the latter half it seems they just sort of went “Well, we spent a bunch of time doing stuff good, but now we don’t have enough time left to make an actual movie out of this… Oh well, just chuck an hour of lasers in there and we’ll worry about that next film!” which just isn’t good enough. When _Into Darkness_ comes out later this year, the format will probably pay off, but looking at the merits of Star Trek alone, I think it fell short.

Simon Pegg (_Hot Fuzz, Shaun of the Dead_) as the new Scotty and Zachary Quinto (_American Horror Story, Heroes_) as the new Spock were both solid choices, but other casting decisions like Winona Ryder (_Black Swan, Alien: Resurrection_) as Spock’s mother were an off-shot in the worst possible way.

I suppose though, in science fiction, it’s often safety first and little steps. As a member of what is probably the most frowned upon of the genres, I wish this Star Trek reboot all the best in its inevitable future, and it seems it will make good use of it. But for now, the solo film itself didn’t reach as far as I felt it could have with a little harder work towards the end.



Review By: Gimly

A franchise re-energised-big time!

It’s not an understatement to say that the news of a new Star Trek movie was met in equal measure by suspicion and pretty low expectations. Step forward J.J. Abrams to direct it, and many wondered while the guy behind TV series “Lost” and “Mission Impossible III” would want to dabble on hallowed sci-fi turf?. Things were further eyebrow raising when Abrams openly admitted to not having been a fan of the original show so cherished by a legion of Trekkies. Then news came of the film being a prequel, based around the Starfleet Academy and the coming together of what we know as the U.S.S. Enterprise crew. “Ooh that will be a tough one to carry off” said many, “Kirk & Spock as young spunkers – surely not” they said. Well not only did Abrams pull it off as it were, he simultaneously appeased most Trekkies whilst garnering a whole new generation of sci-fi observers. Budgeted at $140,000,000, Abrams Star Trek went on to gross Worldwide $384,953,778. Figures that, even allowing for the huge fan-base that the franchise has, show that many first timers not only went to see it – but also that they enjoyed it so much they went back for second helpings. I know I did.

The success of the film isn’t hard to fathom, because although Abrams upped the action quota (with a number of breath taking and eye appealing sequences) he also dispensed with much of the sci-fi psycho babble that has blighted some of the previous filmic instalments in this most up and down of franchise’s. Sure there’s stuff in there for the discerning fan, with a time travelling revenge plot at its axis, how could there not be?, But Abrams and his writers (Roberto Orci /Alex Kurtzman) keep it simple, savvy and sexy. They smartly link to Trek lore with a crucial plot and character development featuring the Kobayashi Maru, while pain, emotional conflict and personal crisis all feature heavily. This is, one can “logically” say, a spiky post 9/11 Trek movie. There’s even room for a romantic strand, a strand that is tender and fits the whole make-up of the piece perfectly. All of which only works because the cast are, in the main, producing great work.

Getting Leonard Nimoy to appear in a small, but crucial role, is nothing short of being a master-stroke. His presence keeps the all important essence of Star Trek within what is ultimately a reboot. It’s like a father figure watching over proceedings, making not only the cast feel safe, but also us the viewers. The youngsters in the cast are impressive, Chris Pine (Kirk), Zachary Quinto (Spock) and Zoe Saldaña (Uhura) lead from the fresh faced front. While Karl Urban (Bones McCoy) and Simon Pegg (Scotty) impact with comic relief that aids instead of hinders the plot developments. Villain duties falls to Eric Bana as Romulan Captain Nero, he’s a touch miffed is Nero, and Bana brings the character’s vengeful pain vividly to life. While Bruce Greenwood as Captain Christopher Pike adds a touch of class that he almost always seems to do.

This U.S.S. Enterprise has launched itself in another direction, and yes, it’s boldly going where no-one has boldly gone before. It is, all told, a bona fide blockbuster with brains and balls. The like of which has sadly been missing from many a modern era summer release. Yes it’s not all perfect, the odd scene could quite easily have been jettisoned, and some accents need a bit of fine tuning, but they are very minor complaints. A triumph from Abrams and his team – note the Stardate in the ships log, for this is a noteworthy moment in modern sci-fi cinema. Now comes perhaps a bigger challenge, the notoriously difficult second film… 10/10

Review By: John Chard
Review from
Star Trek. When someone speaks this name, various images, ideas, characters and phrases come to mind. I know they certainly do with me. Characters such as Kirk, Spock, Picard, Data, Janeway, Seven of Nine; ideas like the prime directive; phrases like “Live long and Prosper”, “Good God Jim, I’m a doctor not a….”. I wouldn’t consider myself a “Trekkie”, but I do have a deep affection for this series and world.

To my great delight, I was fortunate enough to see an advanced screening last night of JJ Abrams re-imaging of “Star Trek”. I must admit that I was skeptical at first about taking such iconic characters and recasting them, even in younger iterations, because most people think of the characters of Kirk, Spock, Bones, Scotty, Uhura, Sulu and Chekov with the actors that originally portrayed them. These portrayals are engrained in the pop culture consciousness of the world and hence my skepticism arose. Fortunately, my doubts were unnecessary.

This is not your father’s “Star Trek”. From the moment the movie begins, so does the action and it never lets up. However, this movie has more than just incredible and intense action, it also pays homage to the series of old. Sure, they wanted to bring us a Trek for the 21st century, but they also realized that they needed to respect the source material and fans of a series that has been around more than 40 years. However, you don’t need to know much about Star Trek to enjoy this movie. Each character has been given a background and history that lets you know a little something about each one. There’s a lot to be told in an origin movie and it is handled deftly by both the writers and the director.

But, what really made the movies for me were the actors chosen to play these roles, especially Chris Pine as Kirk, Zachary Quinto as Spock and Karl Urban as Dr. McCoy, aka “Bones”. This movie would not have worked if the casting of these three characters had not been spot on. Both Mr. Quinto and Urban uncannily channel their predecessors, Leonard Nimoy and DeForest Kelley. They took on some of their inflections, mannerisms and expressions to really give you a sense that they are just younger versions of the originals. Chris Pine, however, takes on the most memorable role in Trek history and makes it his own. This Kirk is not only the womanizer, lover, and captain that you already know, but as portrayed by Mr. Pine also has a swagger, bravado, intelligence, and is a complete adrenaline junkie. We could not have asked for a better Kirk in this movie.

They have laid a solid foundation for a new series, with new life, perfect cast and a director with a true vision. If the first movie can be this good, my expectations for further adventures have risen exponentially.

This is my first review for our website and as such might not be very good since I have no experience at writing reviews. I intentionally didn’t reveal any plot points so as to not spoil anything for whoever may read this. I may in the future reveal areas that may have spoilers but mark these sections so you can skip over them. I’ll be seeing Wolverine tomorrow and hope to have a review up by tomorrow night. Until we meet again, “Live long and Prosper!”

Review By: jason-2281
I haven’t seen the original Star Trek but it has a reputation for being heavy on the technobabble and continuity lockout. This film is an attempt to remake it closer to a traditional Hollywood blockbuster and it works. It is easy to follow and full of exciting action, though I can’t compare it with the original.
Review By: briancham1994

Other Information:

Original Title Star Trek
Release Date 2009-05-06
Release Year 2009

Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 7 min (127 min)
Budget 150000000
Revenue 385680446
Status Released
Rated PG-13
Genre Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi
Director J.J. Abrams
Writer Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman, Gene Roddenberry
Actors Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Simon Pegg
Country United States, Germany
Awards Won 1 Oscar. 27 wins & 95 nominations total
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix DTS, SDDS, Dolby Digital, Sonics-DDP (IMAX version), Dolby Atmos
Aspect Ratio 1.43 : 1 (Main title shot: IMAX 70mm version), 2.35 : 1, 2.35 : 1 (original ratio), 2.39 : 1 (original ratio)
Camera Arriflex 435 ES, Panavision Primo Anamorphic Lenses, Panavision Panaflex Millennium XL2, Panavision Primo, C- & E-Series, ATZ and AWZ2 Lenses, Panavision Panaflex Platinum, Panavision Primo, C- & E-Series, ATZ and AWZ2 Lenses
Laboratory Company 3 (digital intermediate), DeLuxe, Hollywood (CA), USA, FotoKem Laboratory, Burbank (CA), USA
Film Length 3,310 m (Italy), 3,462 m (Sweden), 3,499 m (Portugal, 35 mm)
Negative Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision2 100T 5212, Vision2 500T 5218)
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format), Panavision (anamorphic) (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision 2383), 70 mm (horizontal) (IMAX DMR blow-up) (Kodak Vision 2383), D-Cinema

Star Trek 2009 123movies
Star Trek 2009 123movies
Star Trek 2009 123movies
Star Trek 2009 123movies
Star Trek 2009 123movies
Star Trek 2009 123movies
Star Trek 2009 123movies
Star Trek 2009 123movies
Star Trek 2009 123movies
Star Trek 2009 123movies
Original title Star Trek
TMDb Rating 7.433 8,906 votes

Similar titles

The Last Mercenary 2021 123movies
The Country Bears 2002 123movies
Batman Begins 2005 123movies
Slave Girls from Beyond Infinity 1987 123movies
The Watchers: Revelation 2013 123movies
What Happened to Monday 2017 123movies
Tough Luck 2004 123movies
The Christmas Chronicles: Part Two 2020 123movies
Ape vs. Monster 2021 123movies
On Golden Pond 1981 123movies
Black Fox 2019 123movies
The Portuguese Falcon 2015 123movies 123movies