The Haunting of Sharon Tate 2019 123movies

Watch: The Haunting of Sharon Tate 2019 123movies, Full Movie Online – Pregnant with director Roman Polanski’s child and awaiting his return from Europe, 26-year-old Hollywood actress Sharon Tate becomes plagued by visions of her imminent death..
Plot: Pregnant with director Roman Polanski’s child and awaiting his return from Europe, 26-year-old Hollywood actress Sharon Tate becomes plagued by visions of her imminent death.
Smart Tags: #sleaze #exploitation #white_briefs #tighty_whities #actress #year_1969 #killer #mass_murder #mass_murderer #pregnancy #charles_manson_character #sharon_tate_character #1960s #26_year_old #26_year_old_woman #bare_chested_male #briefs #man_wears_tighty_whities #speedo #timeframe_1960s #man_wears_underwear

Find Alternative – The Haunting of Sharon Tate 2019, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	2.9/10 Votes: 4,123
	19% | RottenTomatoes
	8/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 168 Popularity: 14.375 | TMDB

Reviews:

Based on a True Story…RLY??? This is really pushing the limits of “based on”…where to even begin…..
I am sorry for the families that suffered in the loss of life in this true ordeal. Now some pathetic people have made a “movie” that makes a mockery of a tragic event. Shameful release!

If this movie was called ‘The Haunting of Karen Slate’, it just would be another terrible On Demand/DTV movie that I come across numerous times a year (many distributed by Lionsgate), but taking a real-life event, and one involving brutal murders, takes it to another level. This was just awful with a confusing plot, horrible dialogue, pedestrian direction (putting it kindly) and bad acting, particularly on Hillary Duff’s part.

If it weren’t so disrespectful to the families involved, I would find part of this to be unintentionally funny, but can’t even give it that much.

I know the Razzies are a joke, but this one deserves all the hate that has come its way. This is one that should’ve remained on the dusty shelves in some nondescript basement office, or better yet, destroy the prints.

What a Steaming Pile of Crap!
Horrible ten cent fictionalized version of the Sharon Tate murders in 1969 is the worst possible thing imagined. As if the real life murders weren’t bad enough, this movie changes the outcome and turns it into a low rent slasher film. I expected Roman Polanski to fly in on Bat wings and vanquish the mighty Manson family. I realized, however, that I had been conned. As someone who has seen nearly all the major Manson films, that I was suckered into this hoping that it would interesting. Forgetting reality for a moment, how does the movie play as a thriller. Terrible. The camera work bips and bops around like Uncle Jim just got his new camcorder. The acting is awful but in fairness to them the dialogue is so bad that Meryl Streep would have had trouble with it. Really though, this is exploitation of the worst kind, taking a monumental event in history and turning it into a complete sham.If people really do turn over in their graves then Sharon Tate must be rolling now. Watch it if you must but expect full and complete garbage of the worst order!

An unremarkable horror film exploiting a real-life tragedy
Daniel Farrands’ latest film tells the tragedy of Sharon Tate, one of 5 deaths in an infamous real-life mass murder committed by the members of Charles Manson’s cult. The release comes close to the 50th anniversary of those events.

I entered hoping for a fact-based biopic of Sharon Tate and what happened that night, giving life to the people that were killed and showing us who those people were during their short lives and final days. What we actually get is a rather dull sensationalistic take on the facts, used purely to create a horror film off the back of the tragedy. Had I seen his previous film based on Amityville murderer Ronald DeFeo (which I watched after this and is better executed while feeling narrowly less exploitive), I would’ve know what to expect – a mostly fictional horror story based on real victims of a real tragedy.

While it uses the real life events as an influence on the characters and story, there’s clearly a lot of artistic license used and the result is a sub-par horror film that leaves a bitter taste in the mouth due to its exploitation of the real tragedy that took place. There was an opportunity to pay respect to the people that lost their lives, but unfortunately we get a forgettable home-invasion horror film with a particularly odd plot point, which feels absurd for a film which wants to give the impression that it’s a fact-based biopic.

I can appreciate why Sharon Tate’s sister was so against the film.

There’s nothing particularly interesting about this film and it doesn’t do justice to the innocent victims, nor reveal much of anything that we didn’t already know. It invents more than it enlightens. Without revealing spoilers, Farrands could have easily made this horror film as a fictional story, with fictional characters, and the result would probably have earned slightly better ratings. But at its core it’s a by-the-numbers horror with attempted jumps, moments of suspense, and cat-and-mouse chases, but it definitely does not give the impression (to me at least) that it wants to pay homage to the victims, nor deglorify Manson.

The acting is okay, but it’s hardly top class, and Duff seems to fade in and out of using an odd accent in her portrayal of Tate. Some of the script feels unnatural, the characters are underdeveloped and some of the acting and dialogue is wooden. The story moves along at a decent pace, but it doesn’t really offer enough to hold interest or build suspense, possibly because we know what’s coming.

Farrands seems to have found himself a new niche, making films about real life tragedies, the next of which will be the murder of OJ Simpson’s wife. Unfortunately, the tragedy of Farrands’ new-found inspiration for his films is that they’re exploiting these horrific real-life events for entertainment and profit.

I give it 1/10 due to the combination of it being an unoriginal and dull horror film, as well as an insensitive exploitation of the tragedy. Had it been presented as a fictional story, with fictional characters, it may have earned closer to 3 or 4 out of ten, but it still wouldn’t have been anything special.

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 34 min (94 min)
Budget 0
Revenue 68904
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Drama, Horror, Thriller
Director Daniel Farrands
Writer Daniel Farrands
Actors Hilary Duff, Jonathan Bennett, Lydia Hearst
Country United States, Mexico
Awards 4 wins & 4 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix N/A
Aspect Ratio 2.35 : 1
Camera N/A
Laboratory N/A
Film Length N/A
Negative Format N/A
Cinematographic Process N/A
Printed Film Format Digital (Digital Cinema Package DCP)