#123movies #fmovies #putlocker #gomovies #solarmovie #soap2day Watch Full Movie Online Free – Thomas Jerome Newton is a humanoid alien who comes to Earth to get water for his dying planet. He starts a high technology company to get the billions of dollars he needs to build a return spacecraft, and meets Mary-Lou, a girl who falls in love with him. He does not count on the greed and ruthlessness of business here on Earth, however.
Plot: Thomas Jerome Newton is an alien who has come to Earth in search of water to save his home planet. Aided by lawyer Oliver Farnsworth, Thomas uses his knowledge of advanced technology to create profitable inventions. While developing a method to transport water, Thomas meets Mary-Lou, a quiet hotel clerk, and begins to fall in love with her. Just as he is ready to leave Earth, Thomas is intercepted by the U.S. government, and his entire plan is threatened.
Smart Tags: #sex_scene #female_nudity #based_on_novel #alien #dying_planet #television_addiction #cult_film #urinating_in_fear #oral_sex #male_nudity #urinating_woman #sex_with_alien #nonlinear_timeline #voice_over_narration #spaceship_crash #gin #bare_chested_male #alcoholism #surrealism #hallucination #drought
|6.7/10 Votes: 24,382|
|6.5 Votes: 326 Popularity: 8.389|
Much better if you’ve read the book
That is sadly the truth behind this quite interesting adaptation of the book. If you’ve read the book, and you liked it, then you’ll love the movie. If not, then bad luck. Because the weakest point in this movie is the lack of explanations and logic behind the main character’s actions. In the book, it’s all beautifully described as the blue transformation of the alien into a human, and his loss of motivation to rescue his planet from a severe draught. In the movie, you just see an alien doing things without much reason or thought about them. This lack of understanding of the main character makes the movie kinda dull and void. However, having read the book, you’ll understand what and why is he doing. That’s not much help because the majority of the viewers will be lost…
That said, it’s a nice movie, maybe a bit on the surrealist side, it has an oniric touch (or maybe the daze of a hang-over after too much booze) which goes well with the atmosphere of the book and story. David Bowie, the obvious star, does very well on the skin of an alien, clearly helped by his quite particular lookings. The supporting actors do well too, but in the end it’s just an above-average movie. Not bad, but thousand light-years of the quality and depth of story which the book has.
In short: could have been great if the script was at least decent. Worth a watch, still.
Is it art, or is it pornography?
I have just watched “The Man Who Fell to Earth” from beginning to end after seeing several scenes here and there from years of flipping past the sci-fi channel or whatever other channel this film might’ve been shown on. I must say that I think it is one of the most interesting films I’ve ever seen. Now before you start thinking this is going to be a review of blind worship, stop for a moment and remember that just because something is interesting doesn’t mean it’s likeable. Art is not meant to be appealing. It’s meant to cause a reaction, it’s meant to make you think, it’s meant to make you uncomfortable. Art forces feelings upon you that you might rather not experience, so whether you like it or not, this film is a work of art. But some art…in fact a lot of art…is trash. Is this movie trash? Some say yes, some say not. Some think it’s brilliant, others think it a waste of time. Some think the narrative’s dependence on visual stimulus as opposed to linear storytelling is a touch of cinematic beauty, while others dismiss it as experimental tripe.
Somebody wrote a scathing review saying that if you like junk like “Lost Highway,” you might enjoy this movie. Well, no offense meant, but I’d like to say that this person has made clear that he can’t see past what’s appealing. Why watch something that’s unappealing you might ask? Because that’s what art’s supposed to do…it challenges you and your values. Sometimes it reinforces them, and sometimes it will blatantly attack them. You have to draw your own conclusions and interpretations. “The Man Who Fell to Earth” is no different. Yes, the film seems to jump from time to time, one scene juxtaposed with a scene that takes place 20 years later, a flashback that may or may not be a flashback, it is confusing. I know I was confused. It’s not a linear narrative…it’s telling a story through pictures, with occasional words just to make sure you have a little more than an inkling as to what you’re supposed to be seeing. Personally, I would be interested to see the movie without dialogue…like “Aeon Flux,” a story can be told philosophically and artistically without words.
What is the story? Well…quite simply, David Bowie, in his first and probably one of his best on-screen performances, is an alien on Earth trying to find a way to get water back to his world. Is it as simple as it sounds? Not by any means. But you have to believe it to see it. You will be confused, you might even be offended (there’s a lot of sexually explicit scenes that border on pornography), but one way or the other, this film is meant to be visually stimulating. What you see will make you think…if you’re repulsed by it and feel the urge to turn it off, then it’s simply not your kind of movie.
On the whole, I like this movie, though I must be in a certain mood to watch it. It is not easy to watch, there are long stretches without dialogue, and when there is dialogue, it’s often confusing. But no matter what, I like what I was seeing on the screen. I do feel like watching it again because I know there is more to absorb and take in, there’s more to think about that I missed before. But that’s the kind of person I am…I want to think, and I want that discomfort this movie gives me because I am alleviated by the need to solve it, not dismiss it. Bowie is in fine form, probably used to alienation being a Brit in America, and having played his own Ziggy Stardust character in the past. The rest of the cast performs rather competently, although nobody’s performance shines as much as Bowie’s (although Candy Clarke is pretty good in some scenes, and Rip Torn’s deadpan performance is a bit of dry humor).
Dispute me if you must, I give this movie ***1/2 out of ****.
Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 19 min (139 min), 1 hr 59 min (119 min) (cut) (Sweden)
Genre Drama, Sci-Fi
Director Nicolas Roeg
Writer Paul Mayersberg (screenplay), Walter Tevis (from the novel by)
Actors David Bowie, Rip Torn, Candy Clark, Buck Henry
Awards 1 win & 4 nominations.
Production Company British Lion Film Corporation
Sound Mix 4-Track Stereo
Aspect Ratio 2.39 : 1
Camera Panavision Lenses
Laboratory Technicolor, London, UK
Film Length 3,280 m (Sweden, cut version)
Negative Format 35 mm
Cinematographic Process Panavision (anamorphic)
Printed Film Format 35 mm