#123movies #fmovies #putlocker #gomovies #solarmovie #soap2day Watch Full Movie Online Free – Paleontologist Kate Lloyd is invited by Dr. Sandor Halvorson to join his team who have found something extraordinary. Deep below the Arctic ice, they have found an alien spacecraft that has been there for perhaps 100,000 years. Not far from where the craft landed, they find the remains of the occupant. It’s cut out of the ice and taken back to their camp but as the ice melts, the creature reanimates and not only begins to attack them but manages to infect them, with team members devolving into the alien creature.
Plot: When paleontologist Kate Lloyd travels to an isolated outpost in Antarctica for the expedition of a lifetime, she joins an international team that unearths a remarkable discovery. Their elation quickly turns to fear as they realize that their experiment has freed a mysterious being from its frozen prison. Paranoia spreads like an epidemic as a creature that can mimic anything it touches will pit human against human as it tries to survive and flourish in this spine-tingling thriller.
Smart Tags: #alien #scientist #antarctica #snow #alien_creature #polar_research_station #frozen_body #characters_killed_one_by_one #body_horror #spaceship #horror_movie_prequel #prequel #paranoia #suspended_animation #male_wearing_an_earring #lone_survivor #mistrust #aerial_camera_shot #necropsy #female_scientist #metal_dental_filling
|6.2/10 Votes: 122,800|
|6.1 Votes: 1997 Popularity: 31.62|
Okay, here’s the thing about ‘The Thing’…
When it was announced that this was going into production, there was a level of confusion/curiosity regarding what exactly it would be: remake/reboot/sequel/prequel? Also, would it utilize prosthetic effects like the 1982 original, or would it go all out CGI splatter? As it turns out, it’s a combination of the former and the latter. The new ‘The Thing’ wants to have its cake and eat it too: you see, technically, it’s a prequel but for some reason, the makers have molded it as kind of a remake as well. That’s both clever and rather infuriating in equal measures. With regards to the effects, yes, they are CGI for the most part, but they look practical and are done well.
Story-wise, with the exception of some additions, it hits the same beats as John Carpenter’s original movie too. An alien vessel is discovered frozen in the Antarctic permafrost by a Norwegian research team. Finding a mysterious life form, they bring it back to their research station. Even though there’s no mention of an American in the original, the makers shoehorn one in here, clearly unconvinced that a movie comprised entirely of Europeans would sell. And likewise, it’s a female – once again, you get the feeling they’re not confident that an all male cast would sell this time round and are taking no chances.
The American, a palaeontologist (Mary Elizabeth Winstead), is drafted into the equation by a member of the research group. Then they set about participating in a scientific study of the alien creature. Only problem is, it returns to life, and being a shape shifter that can replicate any living organism, starts to hide amongst the group, leading to lots of finger pointing, flame throwers, explosions and suspicion fueled arguments. Sounds rather familiar, right?
Whereas the original 1982 movie was all about paranoia and the fear of the unknown – the alien hid among the human hosts, desperate to remain concealed at all costs, only showing itself when it felt its identity was compromised – it’s distinctly not the case here. In this movie, the creature revels in revealing itself at every available opportunity. With bells ringing. It screams and shrieks its presence to such an extent that all notions of a story based on the mistrust and doubt of an isolated group of characters goes out the window. What’s the point in being a shape shifter if you’re going to constantly give the game away? Then there’s another aspect that doesn’t quite ring true: early on in the movie, the characters witness a violent helicopter crash. The logical thing would be to go out to investigate it and search for survivors but for some reason, they all choose to ignore it. Additionally, one can’t help but wish the makers had called the movie by a different title; after all, if it’s meant to be an official prequel to the ‘The Thing’, why call it the same name?
It’s not that it’s bad movie; as remakes go, it’s really rather good and executed with a lot of style. Sequel-wise, it’s up there with Psycho 2. As with the original, we get a scene where there’s a ‘big test’ as Mary Elisabeth attempts to ascertain who’s who in the group. In the original, Kurt Russell used blood samples; here, they go for an admittedly clever spin on that scene, while being totally different, adds a new aspect to the creature while also playing as some kind of homage. You might even conclude that since this is a prequel, then you must know the ending, right? After all, we saw how it ended in the opening scenes of the original 1982 movie starring Kurt Russell. Wrong. While they don’t violate the events, they take the movie in a whole different direction but still shrewdly stick with the original time- line.
Mary Elizabeth Winstead is very good in this. She doesn’t strut around with a “Look at me, I’m so gorgeous” expression; in fact she plays the role – sans make up, for the most part – with a level of icy, cool female conviction unseen in a movie about a creature from outer space since a little movie made in 1979 called ‘Alien’. It can’t be an accident that she reminds the viewer of the Ripley character played by Sigourney Weaver in the same movie and even possess a similarly unconventional beauty. Based on this, it wouldn’t be surprising if she ended up replacing Weaver in the inevitable reboot/remake etc. of that franchise.
The John Carpenter original was rightly celebrated for its surreal effects, giving audiences something that was genuinely cutting edge and never seen before at the time. Happily, there is lot of utterly bizarre transformations going on here as well that will make your jaw drop: a guy’s face splits open; two men fuse together and in an attempt to outdo the spider-head of the original, we see a monstrous four-legged creation stalking its prey. While everything is 90% CGI, once again it’s done in such a way that it almost homages the original. For the most part the effects here look similar to the 1982 movie, except they’re done with a sheen that only CG could create.
In conclusion, is it any good? Yes, it is. It’s not the disaster some snotty critics would have you believe. While it’s not as good as John Carpenter’s move (but then, what is?), it still honors the original while effectively and cleverly building the story that lead to the events in that movie. Yes, the aforementioned ‘Thing’ does shout and scream a bit too much, giving away its presence all too often, but that could easily be interpreted as a legacy of its inexperience with humans. This is a prequel, after all. But don’t worry – by the time Kurt Russell and pals come along, it will have learned its lesson.
The hate this movie gets is ridiculous in my opinion.
I’ve been a fan of the Carpenter’s The Thing since I was a little kid. It is one of the best sci-fi/horror movies of all time, in my opinion. The story, characters, setting, effects, sound, music, acting…all great. It stands next to Alien as the best of the sci-fi horror genre.
I think this movie did it justice and gave me something I always wanted ever since seeing the original: a movie of the Norwegian camp’s story.
This movie did exactly that. The CGI did bother me, but it seems that they did some tweaks for the Blu-Ray release and it looks much better. The CGI scenes looked too shiny before, very obvious. I just watched the Blu-Ray for the first time and it looks worlds better. The film grain, extra detail, color, and lack of DNR helped a lot. There were only a couple scenes that stood out, whereas before most of the CGI slapped you in the face and stood out like a sore thumb.
It is sad how the studio messed with this movie. If they hadn’t stepped in and shined over the practical effects with so much CGI, and if they hadn’t added the “boss fight” at the end, this movie would be even better. Especially the end…. The original ending sounded awesome and would have actually explained some of the origins of the creature such as “why was it on that ship” “why did it leave the ship” “was it flying the ship?” etc.
Mary Elizabeth Winstead did a great job in this movie and all the acting was good.
The original is a 10/10 for me. One of the most perfect movies in my book. This movie gets an 8 for the Blu-Ray. Before seeing the Blu-Ray, the special effects bothered me so much I would have rated it as a 7.
Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 43 min (103 min)
Genre Horror, Mystery, Sci-Fi
Director Matthijs van Heijningen Jr.
Writer Eric Heisserer, John W. Campbell Jr. (short story “Who Goes There?”)
Actors Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Joel Edgerton, Ulrich Thomsen, Eric Christian Olsen
Country Canada, USA, UK
Awards 5 nominations.
Production Company Strike Entertainment
Sound Mix Dolby Digital, Datasat, SDDS
Aspect Ratio 2.39 : 1
Camera Arriflex 235, Panavision G-Series Lenses, Arriflex 435, Panavision Primo, E- and G-Series Lenses, Panavision Panaflex Millennium XL2, Panavision Primo, E- and G-Series Lenses
Laboratory EFILM Digital Laboratories, Hollywood (CA), USA (digital intermediate)
Film Length 2,812 m (Portugal, 35 mm)
Negative Format 35 mm (Kodak)
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format), Panavision (anamorphic) (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision 2383), D-Cinema