What's happening?


Your internet provider under law REPORT streaming of pirated content! Your Browser & OS leaks your IP data - !

Video Sources: 167 Views

The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies

The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies

EARN. SPEND. PARTY.180 Min.
Your rating: 0
8 1 vote

Summary:

#123movies #fmovies #putlocker #gomovies #solarmovie #soap2day Watch Full Movie Online Free – Jordan Belfort is a Long Island penny stockbroker who served 22 months in prison for defrauding investors in a massive 1990s securities scam that involved widespread corruption on Wall Street and in the corporate banking world, including shoe designer Steve Madden.
Plot: A New York stockbroker refuses to cooperate in a large securities fraud case involving corruption on Wall Street, corporate banking world and mob infiltration. Based on Jordan Belfort’s autobiography.
Smart Tags: #based_on_true_story #stockbroker #female_frontal_nudity #female_rear_nudity #topless_female_nudity #fellatio #female_nudity #caught_masturbating #anal_sex #debauchery #sex_in_an_airplane #female_full_frontal_nudity #bare_breasts #snorting_cocaine_from_a_naked_woman #sex_in_bed #hot_candle_wax_during_sex #extramarital_affair #oral_sex #sex_standing_up #1990s #mile_high_club


The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 Streaming Links:


FandangoMoviesIVAUS

iTunes

Google Play

Amazon Instant Video

Ratings:

The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies 1The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies 28.2/10 Votes: 1,203,848
The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies 3The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies 279%
The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies 5The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies 275/100
The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies 7The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies 28 Votes: 17272 Popularity: 84.214

Reviews:

**Voracious Bull**

Every time I try to enjoy a Martin Scorcese movie post-1980 I ask myself what made _Raging Bull_ so great? Did Marty burn out after his Jake LaMotta bio, the same way Coppola did after _Apocalypse Now_? These were risky movies, driven by passion, bordering on madness. Did Marty and Francis lose their natural passion for making films because industry priorities dismissed 70’s-style hyper-realism for sensational summer blockbusters and CGI spectacles? And why is Scorcese considered one of the greatest director when he really only made one truly superb movie?

When I first saw _Raging Bull_ in 1980 I immediately knew I was watching something that transcended the typical cinematic experience. Genius was shimmering out of every perforated frame flickering on the screen. Paul, Marty, Bobby, Mike and Thelma created something that was completely absorbing. The style and substance was perfectly fueled by a flawless emotional narrative. Every element was orchestrated just right. The audience was spellbound. We were watching greatness. A rare and unique organic creation. I’m still waiting for Robert Redford to correct a travesty of justice and hand his Ocscar over to it’s rightful owner. And I’m still waiting for Scorcese to match his own brilliance. But that’s like expecting Tarantino to top _Pulp Fiction_. There’s a better chance Orson Welles rises up from the dead to one up _Citizen Kane_.

After _Raging Bull_, Scorcese has made a string of pictures ranging from not bad to pretty good. All well-made, thoughtful and meticulously crafted films, but nothing special; certainly nothing profound. Contrary to popular opinion, _Goodfellas_ is not a great movie. I was not swept away by the saga. I was annoyed rather by the fragmented non-stop soundtrack and incessant up-tempo style. Marty wasn’t risking anything anymore. He seemed to be afraid of boring the audience. Perhaps he was trying to revive the 1940’s never-let-up screwball-bouncing farcical Preston Sturges and co. comedies. But this is a mafia film. This should have been right up Marty’s alley. It’s been almost a quarter of a century since De Niro got his face busted in a boxing ring. Since the raw, robust and naive will-power of LaMotta’s youth plunged into the pathetic, brutal, bone-headed stupidity of his later years. Similarly, Scorsese hasn’t registered a knock-out punch since. Would his ensuing movies be considered great if someone else directed them? Would I have liked them all better if Raging Bull had never been made?

_The Wolf of Wall Street_ is another exhausting affair. It tries too hard to excite and entertain us. It’s afraid of slowing down, allowing us to ponder or examine the complexities of excessive greed, shameless wealth and unbridled capitalism. It desperately wants to arouse us. Like a neglected clown at a child’s birthday trying to be loved and taken seriously while draining the life out of the party. Give Leo and Jonah an “A” for effort. They couldn’t have tried harder if they broke out into song and dance every ten minutes. And they convincingly appeared to enjoy themselves freely indulging in coke, ludes and naked women every five minutes. It was nice of Leo to step back while Margot Robbie took her routine and obligatory, supporting-actress hissy fit. And you know a filmmaker has a lot of faith and confidence in his work when a superfluous narration track is added, to plug those terrifying noiseless gaps. Whatever happened to poignant, suspenseful, sure-footed, gripping, emotionally-arresting dramas that take you on a nervy, wild ride to a thoroughly gratifying climax? A truly great director from Kurosowa to, well, Scorcese-(circa 1979) would have plotted the rise and fall of a maniacal protagonist along deeper and more affecting lines even at the risk boring its audience for one minute.

Review By: tmdb39513728 Rating: Date: 2015-01-09
I didn’t care for the characters, but I damn did have a great time watching ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’. It’s absolutely nuts, and I mean that in a positive way.

Leonardo DiCaprio simply never puts an acting foot wrong, this is the sixth film I’ve seen of his and I love (fwiw: all 9/10+) them all. Phenomenal actor! He is outstanding here as Jordan Belfort, the guy this film is based upon. As noted, I didn’t really ever care for Jordan but DiCaprio makes it impossible not to enjoy watching events throughout.

Jonah Hill (Donnie) comes in with a very good performance, the type of which I hadn’t previously seen from him; closest being, in terms of quality, ‘Moneyball’. Margot Robbie, meanwhile, isn’t easy to forget as Naomi. Though none of the following standout big, it’s pleasant to see Jon Bernthal, Matthew McConaughey and Jon Favreau, among others, appear.

The almost three hour run time, aside from a couple of moments, goes by fairly quickly. A big reason for that is the sheer bonkers nature of the plot, which goes in so many different directions it’s impressive. It doesn’t, as I’ve already mentioned, breed likeability for the characters but I definitely had a fun time watching it all unfold. I guess it depends on what you, as a viewer, prefer. I got the desired amount of entertainment.

Review By: r96sk Rating: 9 Date: 2021-03-14
Intense!
Perfectly executed in almost all aspects. Great script, great acting, especially Jonah Hill and Leonardo DiCaprio, their chemistry is spot on.
Review By: nomodusproject Rating: 8 Date: 2020-03-08
Leo is one of the rare reliable actors
You can literally watch any movie for leo without reading the reviews, but this movie is special, it’s been the fastest 3 hours in my life .
Review By: hassanmy-03285 Rating: 10 Date: 2021-02-13

Other Information:

Original Title The Wolf of Wall Street
Release Date 2013-12-25
Release Year 2013

Original Language en
Runtime 3 hr (180 min), 2 hr 25 min (145 min) (cut) (Kuwait), 4 hr (240 min) (rough cut)
Budget 100000000
Revenue 392000000
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Biography, Crime, Drama
Director Martin Scorsese
Writer Terence Winter (screenplay), Jordan Belfort (book)
Actors Leonardo DiCaprio, Jonah Hill, Margot Robbie, Matthew McConaughey
Country USA
Awards Nominated for 5 Oscars. Another 37 wins & 174 nominations.
Production Company Appian Way, Emjag, Sikelia
Website N/A


Technical Information:

Sound Mix Datasat, Dolby Digital, Dolby Surround 7.1
Aspect Ratio 1.85 : 1 (some scenes), 2.39 : 1
Camera Arri Alexa Plus, Hawk V-Lite, V-Plus, V-Series, Zeiss Master Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses, Arri Alexa Studio, Hawk V-Lite, V-Plus, V-Series, Zeiss Master Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses, Arricam LT, Hawk V-Lite, V-Plus, V-Series, Zeiss Master Prime and Angenieux Optimo Lenses, Canon EOS C500, Phantom Camera HD
Laboratory DeLuxe, Hollywood (CA), USA, DeLuxe, New York (NY), USA (digital intermediate)
Film Length N/A
Negative Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision3 250D 5207, Vision3 500T 5219), Codex, Gemini 4:4:4
Cinematographic Process ARRIRAW (2.8K) (source format), Canon Cinema RAW (4K) (source format) (aerial shots), Digital Intermediate (4K) (master format), Hawk Scope (anamorphic) (source format), Super 35 (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision 2383), D-Cinema

The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies
The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies
The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies
The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies
The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies
The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies
The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies
The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies
The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies
The Wolf of Wall Street 2013 123movies
Original title The Wolf of Wall Street
TMDb Rating 8 17,272 votes

Similar titles

The Silencing 2020 123movies
Jennifer Eight 1992 123movies
The Flu 2013 123movies
Sex and the Future 2020 123movies
Sneakers 1992 123movies
Wish I Was Here 2014 123movies
Seeking Justice 2011 123movies
Meet the Blacks 2016 123movies
Deep Impact 1998 123movies
First Kid 1996 123movies
Coma 1978 123movies
Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & Shaw 2019 123movies
Openloading.com: 123Movies