Watchmen 2009 123movies

Watch: Watchmen 2009 123movies, Full Movie Online – It’s 1985 in an alternate reality. The Watchmen – comprised of the Comedian, Dr. Manhattan, Nite Owl II, Ozymandias, Rorschach and Silk Spectre II – are a disparate band of masked superheroes, modeled after the Minutemen, who were masked superheroes of a generation earlier, most of who are dead or afflicted by the ravages of life. The Comedian belongs to both groups. Despite the activities of the Watchmen leading to the west winning the Vietnam War which in turn has kept Richard Nixon in the White House, Nixon has now outlawed masks, resulting in the Watchmen disbanding and going into retirement, most hiding their Watchmen past under their human identities. However, the Comedian, in his human persona of Eddie Blake, and Dr. Manhattan – former physicist Jon Osterman who obtained his superhero powers through a scientific accident which almost killed him – now work for the government. Dr. Manhattan’s powers in particular have kept a watch over nuclear proliferation, as he is able to stop any nuclear attack. Regardless, the Cold War is at its height with recent Soviet posturing regarding nuclear bomb buildup. In her human persona of Laurie Jupiter, Silk Spectre II is Dr. Manhattan’s assistant and lover, as much as they can be in Dr. Manhattan’s now non-human state. Meanwhile, Ozymandias has come out to the world as wealthy genius Adrian Veidt, capitalizing on his Ozymandias identity to better the world, and Rorschach continues to work as a vigilante, although one wanted by the law despite he the reason that many criminals are behind bars. When Blake is murdered, Rorschach, as the only one still on the streets, believes the murderer is out to kill all the Watchmen, despite any number of people wanting to kill the Comedian for being a misogynist. Evidence points to it perhaps having something to do with an imminent attempt of nuclear annihilation. Rorschach has to convince his colleagues, who he has not seen since their superhero days, of the validity of his theory for them to come out of retirement, which is no easy task. If they do, which will require them to overcome external forces which seem to be conspiring against them, they will have to discover both who killed the Comedian and why before they befall the same fate as him and/or before the mastermind is able to exact his larger grand plan..
Plot: In a gritty and alternate 1985 the glory days of costumed vigilantes have been brought to a close by a government crackdown, but after one of the masked veterans is brutally murdered, an investigation into the killer is initiated. The reunited heroes set out to prevent their own destruction, but in doing so uncover a sinister plot that puts all of humanity in grave danger.
Smart Tags: #based_on_comic_book #conspiracy #doomsday_clock #false_promise_of_the_american_dream #nihilist #masked_vigilante #rape #nuclear_explosion #female_star_appears_nude #brawl #mars #cold_war #lesbian #female_frontal_nudity #cynicism #brutality #love_triangle #cruelty #date_rape #sociopath #female_rear_nudity

Find Alternative – Watchmen 2009, Streaming Links:

123movies | FMmovies | Putlocker | GoMovies | SolarMovie | Soap2day

Ratings:

	7.6/10 Votes: 552,688
	65% | RottenTomatoes
	56/100 | MetaCritic
	N/A Votes: 7948 Popularity: 48.425 | TMDB

Reviews:

If you enjoy reading my Spoiler-Free reviews, please follow my blog 🙂

First of all, this review is based on the theatrical version of Watchmen. Usually, Director’s Cuts or Ultimate Editions are not preferred over the original release. Few films benefit from them, and most are simply an extended cut with a bunch of deleted scenes. It’s only fair and rational that a reviewer watches the version which the whole world saw at the theaters at the respective time. With that said, despite knowing the story of the source material, I never indeed read it. Having in mind that most of the “hate” that this Zack Snyder’s movie received is from comic-book purists (basically, every book/comic/game/whatever-lover who defends that any cinematic adaptations of any of these sources MUST be 100% the same, with no modifications whatsoever), I’m certain an unbiased perspective is the way to go.

And overall, this is a good feature. Watchmen isn’t just another CBM (comic-book movie). It doesn’t just follow one hero vs. one villain. It’s a whole world (in today’s standards, it’s really a cinematic universe) of “superheroes” meant to be explored in fine detail (hence the release of a TV show today… reviewing that later). It’s an extremely complex world that needs to be thoroughly explained in order to deeply understand how it works, and what’s everyone’s role in it. This is the film’s main problem: it struggles to juggle all of its different storylines and distinct characters. Even with 163min of runtime, it’s impossible to squeeze in all of the necessary information.

So, as expected, Snyder and his team of screenwriters had to simplify, shorten, or even wholly dismiss some story elements that would only stretch the runtime to an unfathomable length. Some of the adaptations work brilliantly, but some fail to give a character its importance or offer no interest to a subplot. However, it’s still easy to understand everything, and how the ending is going to unravel, which leads me to my second issue with the movie: its final act’s heavy exposition.

Like I wrote above, there is a lot of information to deliver. What Snyder did very well was to tell most of it through flashbacks or captivating conversations, but in the final act, where everything was self-explanatory and in no need of more exposition, there is an excess of redundant dialogue that doesn’t really add anything relevant. What the characters are saying is significant, yes, but we, as the audience, already know all of that way before the film’s climax. It’s ironic how they make a joke about villains telling their masterplan to the hero and how this villain isn’t dumb enough to do it, but then proceed to carefully explain everything (that we know already) through exposition.

Sincerely, these are the major problems that I have with the movie. However, I love so much about everything else. From the appropriated and fun soundtracks to the beautiful production design, Zack Snyder and his crew really do a fantastic work technically. Snyder’s style captures Watchmen’s world perfectly. It’s one of those films that carry a “feel” due to its stylish cinematography. I love how little CGI is actually applied (I’m obviously ignoring the big blue guy), and the abundance of practical effects and real sets that are used. The action sequences look spectacular, way better than a lot of blockbusters nowadays (10 years later!).

Despite the terrific technical achievements, my main compliment is actually connected to my number one problem. Even though the storylines are incredibly hard to balance, characters like Rorschach, Nite Owl, Silk Spectre, and The Comedian (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) have extraordinarily captivating and entertaining stories. There might be a few missteps here and there, but Snyder made ONE movie from a material that’s worth a whole TV show or at least two films. And he delivered a GOOD one! Probably a better job than 80% of the directors working today could ever achieve. Finally, the social commentary is still quite relevant for this new generation, and if the so-called “source-material-purists” didn’t exist, this movie would be a lot more appreciated.

All in all, Watchmen is as good as it could be, having in mind it’s just one film with already a long runtime. Its narrative was always going to be extremely difficult to tell in a solid yet compelling manner, and Zack Snyder does struggle with balancing all of the storylines and its characters. However, he and his phenomenal team still delivered a good flick. Technically sublime, with a distinct style, brilliant production design, and gorgeous cinematography. Characters like Rorschach and Nite Owl have amazing moments, filled with excellent action sequences, but also with emotionally powerful scenes. If it could be better? Maybe. If it could be split into two or three movies. As it stands, as one and only film, it’s really impressive even with its flaws.

Rating: B

Click here for a video version of this review: youtu.be/2tkzmGjXfdE

_Watchmen_ polarised audiences when it arrived in theatres in 2009. Coming not long after Marvel’s _Iron Man_ many were expecting a fun action oriented super hero movie. _Watchmen_ however, is not that kind of movie. Just like the source material it comes from, this is a dark and brooding film that deals with some complicated questions.

Here is the official description:

_In a gritty and alternate 1985 the glory days of costumed vigilantes have been brought to a close by a government crackdown, but after one of the masked veterans is brutally murdered, an investigation into the killer is initiated. The reunited heroes set out to prevent their own destruction, but in doing so uncover a sinister plot that puts all of humanity in grave danger._

Starting off with a fantastic montage that, with barely a word, fills you in on the alternate history of the movie, and the timeline of things leading up to the start of the main story, Watchmen does a great job of building this world you are about to inhabit for two hours and 45 minutes. The characters are strong, and develop logically over the course of the film, and you can really feel their sense of despair or feeling of not belonging. I think of all the comic book movies I’ve seen, this one captures best those feelings the characters have of being lonely outsiders. Rorschach’s commitment to the truth in the movie leads to a brilliant defining moment was where it all just bursts out from him. It was very well done. He, as a character, is so good that I think he deserves his own movie in the same noir-ish style.

The length and style of this will turn a lot of people off, it is much more of a character piece than a big explosive action extravaganza. In my opinion, it’s one of the better comic book movies out there.

Top all that off with a fantastic sound track of 1980s music and this is a pretty good package. If you like bright lights and shiny tights, this is not the comic book movie for you. If however you like a super hero movie with some depth and that deals with some philosophical questions this will give you a lot more to chew over than some other DC adaptations.

My favorite movie ever?
For over 25 years now, I have cited Blade Runner as my favorite movie of all time. After seeing Watchmen, I may have to reconsider.

First, I’m glad I went to see the movie alone. I’ve heard so many comments focused on a blue dick, or the length of the movie, or some other such nonsense, that I’m sure watching it with someone would have been a constant barrage of commentary and complaint. And no, that’s not Javier Bardem.

Yes, the movie is long; nearly three hours. But, unlike the dreadfully insipid Titanic, at the end of this movie I wasn’t asking for those three hours of my life back. And, as with all such movies, you must be able to look beyond the literal.

Watchmen is iconic and iconoclastic, deconstructionist and revisionist, laden with allegory and allusion. Consider, for example, the character Ozymandias. I’m wondering how many people who viewed the film ever even heard of Percy Bysshe Shelley’s poem by the same name. The character even quotes the poem on a plinth in his Antarctic lair. The allusion is amazing. Here’s the full quote;

And on the pedestal these words appear — “My name is Ozymandias, king of kings: Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!” Nothing beside remains. Round the decay Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare The lone and level sands stretch far away.’

Clearly one must see the allusion to the work, in this case, of a superhero who hopes to leave mankind a lasting legacy, but realizes in the back of his mind that everything is eventually lost in time. Ozymandias was the first poem I ever examined from an expositional point of view, and I was blown away. The use of it in this movie is equally impactful.

Then there is Dr. Manhattan, named, of course, for the Manhattan Project, which yielded the atomic bomb. His character is an allegory for God, and his relationship with man mirrors the apparent detachment with which God sees suffering in the world He created. The deity reference is reinforced often, and one thinks of Oppenheimer’s citation of the Bhagavad-Gita, in which Vishnu takes on a godly form and says, “Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.”

In an expository scene in the second act, Dr. Manhattan has a sort of recollection of his life. His account is dizzyingly elliptical, since he does not see time as linear the way others do. This scene has the lyrical feel of my favorite piece of fiction, Alan Lightman’s almost unbearably beautiful Einstein’s Dreams, and the reference to Einstein cannot be ignored.

But the real beauty of Watchmen is the moral diversity of its superheroes. Each is flawed in different ways, allowing us to inhabit different ethical perspectives, intellectually at least, and witness their consequences. Everything from Rorshach’s refusal to compromise, which makes him a doomed fugitive, to the ultimate compromise envisioned by Ozymandias, who can dispassionately evaluate scenarios where millions of lives are sacrificed, calls into question our most cherished beliefs. Where does it leave you? Well, that’s for you to decide.

From a purely entertainment perspective, Watchmen is stunning. The visuals are state of the art, and do not suffer from the sort of mental rejection I have for some movies that present too many special effects to swallow at once as reality. And Watchmen doesn’t suffer from Hollywood’s apparent fascination with camp in comic book movies. Camp works to some degree in Spiderman, since he’s a somewhat humorous character to begin with. But the excess of camp rendered the Fantastic Four sequel unwatchable. Watchman proves that superheroes can use more subtle forms of humor, such as irony, without devolving into camp for cheap laughs.

And the music, oh, the music. If you didn’t grow up in the 60’s and 70’s, you will surely miss some of the impact, but don’t worry. Even a second hand recollection of such iconic tunes will suffice. I am reminded of the painfully awful Across the Universe, which couldn’t even pull together a decent movie built around the greatest catalog in modern music. Watchmen does it in spades.

I LOL’d, I cried. The people in the theatre applauded at the end. I vowed to wait 24 hours before writing a review to see if my euphoria passed. It hasn’t.

Very different.
Bunch of Great characters Loved the Comedian.

Best character by far was Rorschach whom I surprisingly found him easy to relate to. Not sure if that’s a good thing. Lol.

The sex scene to Hallelujah was a tad creepy.

Other Information:

Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 42 min (162 min), 3 hr 6 min (186 min) (director’s cut), 3 hr 35 min (215 min) (Ultimate Cut)
Budget 130000000
Revenue 185258983
Status Released
Rated R
Genre Action, Drama, Mystery
Director Zack Snyder
Writer Dave Gibbons, David Hayter, Alex Tse
Actors Jackie Earle Haley, Patrick Wilson, Carla Gugino
Country United States
Awards 11 wins & 24 nominations
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix SDDS, DTS, Dolby Digital, Dolby
Aspect Ratio 2.39 : 1
Camera Arriflex 435, Panavision Primo Lenses, Panavision Panaflex Millennium XL2, Panavision Primo Lenses, Panavision Panaflex Platinum, Panavision Primo Lenses
Laboratory Company 3, Los Angeles (CA), USA (digital intermediate), Technicolor, Hollywood (CA), USA (prints)
Film Length 4,432 m (Sweden), 4,474 m (Portugal, 35 mm), 4,515 m (Finland)
Negative Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision2 100T 5212, Vision2 500T 5218)
Cinematographic Process Digital Intermediate (2K) (master format), Super 35 (source format)
Printed Film Format 35 mm (anamorphic) (Kodak Vision Premier 2393), 70 mm (horizontal) (IMAX DMR blow-up) (Kodak Vision Premier 2393), D-Cinema