#123movies #fmovies #putlocker #gomovies #solarmovie #soap2day Watch Full Movie Online Free – Diana must contend with a work colleague and businessman, whose desire for extreme wealth sends the world down a path of destruction, after an ancient artifact that grants wishes goes missing.
Plot: A botched store robbery places Wonder Woman in a global battle against a powerful and mysterious ancient force that puts her powers in jeopardy.
Smart Tags: #sequel #superhero #dc_extended_universe #1980s #desert #action_heroine #princess #based_on_comic_book #based_on_comic #dc_comics #superheroine #second_part #title_directed_by_female #dc_cinematic_universe #diana_prince_character #reference_to_donald_trump #washington_d.c. #restaurant #one_against_many #lincoln_memorial #cold_war
|5.4/10 Votes: 170,592|
|6.8 Votes: 4442 Popularity: 1767.249|
Heroes are only as good as their villains. Nothing sums up the disappointment of WW84 more than this.
Maxwell Lord & Barbara Minerva are two of the most dangerously dark psyches in DC lore, both fond of extremely nasty, deliberately sociopathic behavior.
Whoever it was pretending to be them in WW84, it wasn’t those two from the comics.
We had some namby-pamby twerp called “Max Lord” who was just a misguided fool trying to fill that emptiness in his pathetic life with a magic dream. Yawn.
Also, some good-hearted ditz called “Barbara Minerva” basically became inadvertent collateral damage whilst Lord’s dopey plan panned out. Admittedly, that’s vaguely similar to one of Cheetah’s later origin stories, but it completely discounts her propensity for choosing the pure evil path.
It could have been fun watching a proper mind-controlling Lord and a proper soul-possessing Cheetah fight over the “ownership” of some red shirt. Alas, no.
What an absolute WASTE of two A-grade narrative heavyweights! But then, that’s the problem.
You simply could NOT use characters like Lord & Cheetah appropriately in a movie targeted towards a family audience, and it’s obvious that “make this family friendly” was plastered all over the script in red sharpie.
Nothing’s likely to change for the third WW installment, where, in keeping with the cinematic PG-downgrade of supervillains, Circe is portrayed as a lonely kid’s party magician who gets angry when her balloons get popped, so she turns everyone into pet unicorns.
1984, a sequel to the fantastic “Wonder Woman”, which showed a cool breeze in the middle of a saturated superhero cinematic market, is a fantastic continuation of the story of our favourite super heroine. Lighter in action, but thematically profound, this may not be a film that pleases everyone.
Let’s start with the positives: Gal Gadot, as a wonder woman, continues to prove to be the perfect choice to play the part. The actress maintains a strong bond with the audience , really showing all the strong emotions that the character feels during the course of the story. Without her, the film would lose something really essential: her soul.
The story, thematically linked to greed, our deepest desires and selfishness, provides a journey of development for the characters that makes us reassess certain attitudes taken throughout our lives. The story seeks to develop each of the characters, and this is what gives it so much strength.
Chris Pine, as Steve Trevor, is also one of the film’s high points, and his chemistry with Gadot remains explosive, providing the film with an engaging romance that will make anyone feel warm inside.
The film is completely different from the first, its style is radically changed, becoming lighter, like a cartoon we watched on Saturday morning as children. For some, dramatic stylistic change may be a negative factor, but in a year of so much suffering, lightness and hope are exactly what we need to abstract ourselves from real life for two hours.
When it comes to action, the film is not as explosive as first, it is contained and the action sequences, though incredible, are scarce. In a two and a half hour film, this may entice some to feel bored. But in my opinion, the film never slows down because of the incredible characters and their interactions.
As far as the most negative points of the film are concerned, I would say that the rope of suspension of credibility is really stretched during the duration of the film and we are asked to accept really ridiculous things that come out of nowhere. The film is also very cheesy, with sequences that can be considered lame and dull.
All in all, however, this film is a glimmer of hope and joy in a dark and desperate year. I strongly advise you to watch it, it’s two hours of fun, with no problems and smiles in the mix. Although not perfect, and inferior to the first, this sequel is worthy of the adjective “Wonder”.
Too long, too slow. Quite uninteresting. An absolute ton of plot holes. DC destroy another movie. Did Gal Gadot forget how to act? Don’t waste your time.
First off, I loved the first movie and was looking forward to the sequel. That being said, this was a disappointing convoluted mess. It’s like a train wreck and a dumpster fire had a baby, then the baby puked and that puke became this movie. Seriously, what were they thinking with this script? So many talented actors and so much wasted potential.
So, because the script says so, Diana can make things disappear at will? She can swing from lighting with her lariat? She can block and catch bullets with her lariat? She can attach and swing from airplanes that are at cruising altitude while she’s on the ground?! All of these exaggerated abilities while she’s supposedly losing her powers? Another thing, her suit was supposed to be powerful, yet it crumbled like tinfoil during her five minute fight with Cheetah. What was the point of her wearing it then if she was back at full strength?
Max Lord’s character was laughable. The stone wasn’t crumbling with every wish, so why was he getting sick after granting wishes even though he became the stone? None of this lunacy made any sense whatsoever.
This movie was so bad that I walked out of my own house. Seriously, skip this and watch the first movie.
Original Language en
Runtime 2 hr 31 min (151 min)
Genre Action, Adventure, Fantasy
Director Patty Jenkins
Writer Patty Jenkins (story by), Geoff Johns (story by), Patty Jenkins (screenplay by), Geoff Johns (screenplay by), Dave Callaham (screenplay by), William Moulton Marston (based on characters from DC Wonder Woman created by)
Actors Gal Gadot, Chris Pine, Kristen Wiig, Pedro Pascal
Country USA, UK, Spain
Awards 5 wins & 32 nominations.
Production Company DC Comics, Warner Bros., DC Entertainment, Atlas Entertainment, The Stone Quarry
Sound Mix Dolby Atmos
Aspect Ratio 1.43 : 1 (some scenes: IMAX Laser), 1.90 : 1 (some scenes: Digital IMAX and HBO Max), 2.39 : 1
Camera Arri Alexa 65, Panavision Sphero 65 Lenses (some scenes), Arri Alexa XT, Panavision Primo Lenses (some scenes), Arriflex 235, Panavision Primo Lenses, Arriflex 435, Panavision Primo Lenses, IMAX MSM 9802, Hasselblad Lenses (some scenes), Panavision Panaflex Millennium XL2, Panavision Primo Lenses, Panavision Panaflex System 65 Studio, Panavision Sphero 65 Lenses
Laboratory Company 3 (digital intermediate) (dailies), Final Frame (65mm film scanning), FotoKem Laboratory, Burbank (CA), USA (65mm film scanning) (prints), IMAX (65mm film scanning)
Film Length N/A
Negative Format 35 mm (Kodak Vision3 50D 5203, Vision3 250D 5207, Vision3 500T 5219), 65 mm (also horizontal) (Kodak Vision3 50D 5203, Vision3 250D 5207, Vision3 500T 5219), Codex
Cinematographic Process ARRIRAW (3.4K) (6.5K) (source format) (some scenes), Digital Intermediate (4K) (master format), IMAX (source format) (some scenes), Panavision Super 70 (source format) (some scenes), Super 35 (source format)
Printed Film Format D-Cinema (also 3-D version)