Video Sources 6 Views

  • Watch
  • Source 1123movies
  • Source 2123movies
  • Source 3123movies
  • Source 4123movies
Cleopatra 1934 123movies

Cleopatra 1934 123movies

The love affair that shook the world!Oct. 05, 1934100 Min.
Your rating: 0
7 1 vote


#123movies #fmovies #putlocker #gomovies #solarmovie #soap2day Watch Full Movie Online Free – In 48 BC, Cleopatra, facing palace revolt in her kingdom of Egypt, welcomes the arrival of Julius Caesar as a way of solidifying her power under Rome. When Caesar, whom she has led astray, is killed, she transfers her affections to Marc Antony and dazzles him on a barge full of DeMillean splendor. But the trick may not work a third time…
Plot: The queen of Egypt barges the Nile and flirts with Mark Antony and Julius Caesar.
Smart Tags: #femme_fatale #king_herod #cleopatra_character #julius_caesar_character #marc_antony_character #deception #italy #brutus_chracter #cassius_character #casca_character #calpurnia_character #king_herod_character #character_name_as_title #blockbuster #octavius_caesar_character #cicero_character #female_protagonist #egypt #queen #barge #brother_sister_relationship

Find Alternative – Cleopatra 1934, Streaming Links:

123movies Links | FMmovies Links | Putlocker Links | GoMovies Links | SolarMovie Links | Soap2day Links


Cleopatra 1934 123movies 1 Cleopatra 1934 123movies 26.8/10 Votes: 3,776
Cleopatra 1934 123movies 3 Cleopatra 1934 123movies 282%
Cleopatra 1934 123movies 5 Cleopatra 1934 123movies 2N/A
Cleopatra 1934 123movies 7 Cleopatra 1934 123movies 26.2 Votes: 46 Popularity: 7.853


A Demille spectacular but not a history lesson
Reading the comments on this film today, one finds almost all of them comparing it with the 1963 Mankiewicz/Taylor epic which is in colour and twice as long. A significant proportion of those who have seen both versions have expressed their preference for this earlier B/W film by Cecil Demille. But the comments also seem to indicate many of the keen movie fans writing these reviews have little appreciation that several other versions also exist .Two silent films were made, one produced in 1910 runs for 90 minutes, the other produced in 1917 is now totally lost, probably these are now only of historic interest. There have also been versions from other countries in languages other than English which few North American movie fans will have seen, and television versions that suffered from limited budgets. But the 1945 film ‘Caesar and Cleopatra’ made by Gabriel Pascal, based directly on the play by George Bernard Shaw and featuring Vivian Leigh as Cleopatra certainly must be considered whenever major film versions of Cleopatra’s life are being compared. The different writing credits given to these three films are interesting. Those familiar with the works of Shakespeare might expect a life of Cleopatra to be based on his two plays ‘Julius Caesar’ and ‘Anthony and Cleopatra’ (although an earlier starting date would be required), but no direct credit is given to Shakespeare in any of these three films. George Bernard Shaw wrote his play Caesar and Cleopatra covering most of Cleoopatra’s life in 1901.This work is probably the most frequently presented on stage, and is regarded by most people today as the precursor of all three films. It certainly contributes a lot to their structure. However Demille is interested only in his story – his credited to his two Hollywood writers – one for the adaption and the other for the screenplay. By contrast credits for the 1963 film are given to the histories written by Plutarch and Suetonius, whilst Pascal’s 1945 film is not only based directly on the GBS play but uses a film-script written specially for it by the 82 year old Shaw himself, so writing credits go entirely to Shaw. A master of words, Shaw crafted his plays so that their dialogue could feature as many as possible of his witticisms. He was also a crusader who supported many causes including emancipation and female equality – these were often highlighted in his dramatic works. If history had to be edited a little to enable him to write more sparkling dialogue, so be it.

It follows that the 1963 Mankiewicz version is regarded as the most historically reliable, whilst there are a few problems of accuracy in Pascal’s version, particularly in that Cleopatra is portrayed as too young and inexperienced at the start of the film (remarkable since Vivian Leigh who was playing her was 32 at the time); and the Demille version must be accepted as designed to put spectacle ahead of historical veracity. All three films feature great performances, especially in the key role of Cleopatra (and it is very interesting to compare the different images of her which the three great divas present); but many of the supporting roles are also very powerfully acted, and all three films provide examples of what can only be described as the work of great Directors. They also all feature very competent camera work, and there is no justification for not enjoying whichever of them one chooses to view. Our role here is to comment on Demille’s version – not the other two. What we should primarily expect from this film is the superlative spectacle for which Demille is so famous. Similarly if we were watching Pascal’s film we would be entitled to expect the most sparking dialogue and with Mankiewicz’s version we could expect to be seeing the most historically accurate presentation. Unfortunately an increasing number of modern viewers regard full colour presentation as essential for true spectacle so the 1934 version starts with a significant handicap; and the number who have expressed a preference for it when so many would instinctively regard the 1963 colour presentation as inherently more spectacular, is a remarkable tribute to Demille. Claudette Colbert played very few period parts, she was most at home playing the typical Amercan wife and mother, But she was a great actress and her performances as Poppaea (The Sign of the Cross) and Cleopatra are hard to fault. Some viewers have suggested they would have been happier if Cleopatra had been played by an actress with an ethnically Mediterrenean appearance, rather than with the more northerly features of Colbert. I cannot go along with this – whenever we watch acting we accept that we are watching a representation of what might have occurred, not a portrayal of actual individuals or events. In my view Colbert gave a magnificent display of sexuality capable of attracting the attention of even the most dedicated army commander. Demille handled everything else admirably. Other memorable performances come from Warren William as Julius Caesar, Henry Wilcoxon as Marc Anthony, Aubrey Smith as Enobarus, and Ian Keith as Octavian, a key part which is often not adequately appreciated. The battle sequences are kept very brief (budget?) but are much more effective than those in other films from the same period, and the barge scene in which Cleopatra seduces Mark Anthony is widely regarded as a classic. Demille did not go overboard to the same extent that he did in some other films, but a hint of overacting, characteristic of the silent film era, has been continued here and is extremely effective. Particularly noteworthy is Cleopatra’s triumphant entry into Rome which here looks like a real city with real people in residence, not just a film set. This is certainly a film that even the most discerning viewers can still enjoy..

Review By: bbhlthph Rating: 7 Date: 2006-06-09
Epic and a visual treat
What an extraordinary year 1934 was for Claudette Colbert. “It Happened One Night”, “Imitation of Life”, and of course, Cecil B. DeMille’s version of the epic story, “Cleopatra”. It’s lush and extravagant especially for the time period, with absolutely marvelous costumes by Travis Banton, and beautiful art deco sets by Hans Dreier. Warren William is solid as Julius Ceasar and Henry Wilcoxon is passable as Marc Antony, but, wow, Claudette Colbert sizzles as Cleopatra. She finds the right balance between regal grandeur and smooth seduction. This movie just squeaked in before the doors of the Hays Code closed, and thank goodness, because she’s so beautiful while slinking around in those revealing outfits. There are some fantastic dance/circus performances as well, and the movie is such a visual treat. The dialogue sometimes gets a little silly, but DeMille knew a good story when he saw one, and he knew that sex and violence sold. His ambition in production, both in creating big scenes and in the small details, really pay off, and it’s no doubt that this is one of those early films that shaped Hollywood “epic” movies for decades.
Review By: gbill-74877 Rating: 9 Date: 2017-02-01

Other Information:

Original Title Cleopatra
Release Date 1934-10-05
Release Year 1934

Original Language en
Runtime 1 hr 40 min (100 min), 1 hr 32 min (92 min) (West Germany)
Budget 0
Revenue 0
Status Released
Rated Passed
Genre Biography, Drama, History
Director Cecil B. DeMille
Writer Waldemar Young, Vincent Lawrence, Bartlett Cormack
Actors Claudette Colbert, Warren William, Henry Wilcoxon
Country United States
Awards Won 1 Oscar. 2 wins & 4 nominations total
Production Company N/A
Website N/A

Technical Information:

Sound Mix Mono (Western Electric Noiseless Recording)
Aspect Ratio 1.37 : 1
Camera N/A
Laboratory N/A
Film Length (11 reels)
Negative Format 35 mm
Cinematographic Process Spherical
Printed Film Format 35 mm

Cleopatra 1934 123movies
Cleopatra 1934 123movies
Cleopatra 1934 123movies
Cleopatra 1934 123movies
Cleopatra 1934 123movies
Cleopatra 1934 123movies
Original title Cleopatra
TMDb Rating 6.2 46 votes

Similar titles

Easy Rider: The Ride Back 2012 123movies
Big Stone Gap 2014 123movies
Charlie Bubbles 1968 123movies
Colonel Redl 1985 123movies
Demon Slayer -Kimetsu no Yaiba- The Movie: Mugen Train 2020 123movies
Going Down in LA-LA Land 2011 123movies
Salvatore Giuliano 1962 123movies
Film Stars Don’t Die in Liverpool 2017 123movies
Spiral 2021 123movies
Kinjite: Forbidden Subjects 1989 123movies
To Build a Fire 2016 123movies
Landline 2017 123movies